Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Thermal lance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Resolved:

This case has grown stale. I'm not completely sure whether a solution was reached or not.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Thermal lance

[edit]

Involved parties

[edit]

Articles involved

[edit]

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

[edit]

Here is the discussion, which I extracted from the deleted old versions of User talk:Eyrian: 07:55, 17 August 2007 User:Anthony Appleyard

Uses of thermal lances in fiction

[edit]

Transferring discussion to here from Thermal lance's edit comments:-

  • 10:14, 13 June 2007 Eyrian (Talk | contribs | block) (2,074 bytes) (remove irrelevant section)
  • 11:46, 13 June 2007 Anthony Appleyard (Talk | contribs | block) (3,043 bytes) (Rv deletion of "in fiction" section, or please discuss)
  • 17:29, 13 June 2007 Eyrian (Talk | contribs | block) (2,074 bytes) (remove irrelevant section; These consist of trivial references only, and add nothing to the understanding of the article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.)

But this text is not an indiscriminate collection. Many pages about real technology have a section about their appearances in fiction. Anthony Appleyard 18:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I purge them whenever I find them. What good is a list of times they appear? That adds nothing to a user's understanding of the subject, it just clutters up the article. The place for those things is in the article about the fictional work; that's where the relationship should be linked. Now, what would be useful is a referenced section explaining how thermal lances have their capabilities exaggerated or distorted in fiction. A list of trivial references isn't informative. --Eyrian 18:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issues to be mediated

[edit]
  • Inclusion of Appearances in fiction section

Parties' agreement to mediate

[edit]
All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
  1. Agree Anthony Appleyard 05:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
  2. Agree Eyrian 05:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

[edit]

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

Accept.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 06:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take this one. Daniel 06:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.