Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Overlord
Appearance
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
No consensus to promote at this time - Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
- Nominator(s): Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat)
Operation Overlord (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because...I hope it meets A-class criteria. It is a very popular article with a long history. It passed a GA last year and has been improved since. I really hope it passes. Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 23:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, you've only made two edits to this article. It would have been best if you'd discussed starting an ACR with the regulars on its talk page. Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. BTW, the successful outcome of a nomination is automatic credit for the nominator towards an A-Class Medal. That just wouldn't be appropriate in this case, so we would have to modify the workings of Milhistbot. I suggest you withdraw the nomination and discuss with the major contributors on talk. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 01:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Outright, I want to withdraw, and discuss on talkpage later. Thanks for your responses, Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 10:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. BTW, the successful outcome of a nomination is automatic credit for the nominator towards an A-Class Medal. That just wouldn't be appropriate in this case, so we would have to modify the workings of Milhistbot. I suggest you withdraw the nomination and discuss with the major contributors on talk. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 01:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.