Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Kingdom of Loathing
Kingdom of Loathing[edit]
Good game that I'd like to see get to at least GA status, was working on it a while back but things stalled. Most people who edit seem to be fans so there's cruft that needs to go and a lot of the article needs rewriting for better flow but I'm at a loss as to how to actually do it. Help would be nice. --Danie Tei (talk) 13:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
- Inline citations generally aren't required in the lead.
Probably don't need a distributor field in the lead infobox, especially because it's the same as the publisher.
- Traditionally in video game articles, the Gameplay section comes first, followed by Plot, Development, Reception, and Legacy (if applicable).
- You're right about the cruft. Those lists probably aren't necessary, and could be better expressed as prose.
- The History section could be combined with Business model to become Development. Community could go into Gameplay. Radio...probably isn't notable enough to be included.
- The reviews infobox is kind of small. Are there any more scores that can be added? If not, might be best to remove it.
- A lot of the sources seem to be primary or otherwise unreliable.
That's just a quick look. Prose and sources could use some work, but I've definitely seen articles in worse shape. Let me know if you want any copyediting. — Levi van Tine (t – c) 09:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)