Wikipedia talk:ARBPIA
Appearance
@L235: would you oppose targeting this to the index page if we fixed the links? Onceinawhile (talk) 05:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Onceinawhile: There's simply too many, over too many years; I would not suggest such a plan. I could support a hatnote at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @L235: thanks for this. Would you mind giving me an example of how this could be problematic? I could live with a hatnote as well, but I do think it would be better for newbies if we make it even simpler. I have been editing in this area for a decade and I still can't figure out how to navigate all the byzantine ARBPIA process stuff - I am keen to make it simpler for all of us.
- As an aside, I enjoyed reading your essay. This sentence really resonated:
We brand ourselves as "anyone can edit", but we really mean "anyone who has general competence, enough social skills to get along with others on the internet, and skill in research and writing" can attempt to volunteer hours of their time trying to make a small difference in an often-hostile environment.
I think it encapsulates our strengths and weaknesses very well. Personally I would like to see us make more of a positive of these characteristics; that contributing to Wikipedia becomes something that all such people are expected to do with their areas of specialist interest, much like we give to charity or pay our taxes. - Onceinawhile (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- All of the links to WP:ARBPIA at Special:WhatLinksHere/WP:ARBPIA reference the old case. We have a presumption against retargeting such redirects. Is there anything in particular wrong with WP:A/I/PIA? Happy to explore other redirects as well. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 00:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks @L235: I have been editing in the area for many years and I have found it impossible to remember WP:A/I/PIA. All editors just discuss ARBPIA, ARBPIA, ARBPIA, and in using that term they are not referring to the original case but to the latest status.
- Onceinawhile (talk) 08:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- I just created WP:PIA which is much more memorable. Onceinawhile (talk) 09:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- All of the links to WP:ARBPIA at Special:WhatLinksHere/WP:ARBPIA reference the old case. We have a presumption against retargeting such redirects. Is there anything in particular wrong with WP:A/I/PIA? Happy to explore other redirects as well. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 00:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)