Wikipedia talk:Errors in the New International Encyclopedia that have been corrected in Wikipedia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Help|[edit]

I need assistance viz-a-viz Daniel Chester French. Was he a member of The American Academy of Arts and Letters, too? The encyclopedia has him on the list of members. Can someone verify that statement? I may re-install his name. His name is the one that led me to realize that the encyclopedia contains some errors.GhostofSuperslum 14:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intro Paragraph[edit]

It would seem quite appropriate to have an explanatory introduction briefly describing the New International Encyclopedia as well as explaining how and/or why it made errors, and why it is up to Wikipedia specifically to correct these errors. If nobody jumps to the helm on that within four days, I'll take a crack at it. 64.90.198.6 23:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ta-daaaa. A bit late, but there you have it. Oops, forgot to add a remark in thte "edit summary." Grr. Anyway. Feel free to edit or otherwise obliterate! WP:BITE 64.90.198.6 23:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia Britannica errors[edit]

Wikipedia:Errors in the Encyclopædia Britannica that have been corrected in Wikipedia is the older article which inspired this effort to identify errors in New International Encyclopedia. GhostofSuperslum 02:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Errors_in_the_New_International_Encyclopedia_that_have_been_corrected_in_Wikipedia&oldid=104243329"