Wikipedia talk:Namechecking

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Wikipedia essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysTemplate:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Parents as namechecking

I am not entirely sure that identification of parents names in articles is a problem that this essay intends to address. I agree with the rest of the examples. --Bejnar (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Common practice is that it can be acceptable to give forenames (and possibly occupations) of non-notable parents (I don't see the argument for extending this to siblings; any notable & bluelinked relatives can of course be mentioned) in biographical articles where the extra detail is appropriately and succinctly presented, does not bloat the article and does not seem overly namechecky. Deiz talk 16:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance, not notability

Much of what this essay says is basically nonsense (for example, the inclusion of names of people relevant to a topic plainly does assist reader's understanding) and the proposition that all people mentioned must always be notable (rather than merely relevant, even if one or more independent sources say they are relevant) appears incompatible with NNC. James500 (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]