Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia:Resolving disputes contains the official policy on dispute resolution for English Wikipedia. Arbitration is generally the last step for user conduct-related disputes that cannot be resolved through discussion on noticeboards or by asking the community its opinion on the matter.

This page is the central location for discussing the various requests for arbitration processes. Requesting that a case be taken up here isn't likely to help you, but editors active in the dispute resolution community should be able to assist.

Please click here to file an arbitration case Please click here for a guide to arbitration
WT:RFAR subpages

WT:RFAR archives (2004–2009):

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration subpages

Various archives (2004–2011):

Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009–):

Archive of prior proceedings

CasesMotionsDeclined case requests

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2018[edit]

I started editing at the french wikipedia, at the psychology project as I am psychoanalyst, PhD, university teachning, and have scientific responsabilities at a very high international level. The psychology team of the is hold by Pierrette13, and two other psychologists Cathroterdam (experimental) and Bruynek (auto-declared psychoanalyst). They didn't like my arrival and I was new and didn't kno at this moment how to edit, they started treating me agressively, every time I tried to contribute I was forced out, two request at the administers were sold out by my blocking, and now again they are forcing a global block. [1]

During all previous attempts to discuss and explane myself my diff wasn't take into account. It is troue that when they agress me I am pointing out. For exemple they errased my page [2] yelling on my and making fun etc, etc. They are following me and interfere to my editing, and then they pretend that I am following them. Could you check the history ? I will be willing to send  you more details and diffs, but honestly I am not sure any more that someone could examine my request.Could you help me please? --Marloen (talk) 21:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC) Marloen (talk) 21:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 Not done: The English Wikipedia has no control over anything that happens on the French Wikipedia pages, you would need to raise this in the appropriate venue there. Amortias (T)(C) 21:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Dates on 2018 Motions[edit]

The motions in the 2018 section appear to have 2017 dates. I think the dates are wrong, not the header. Alternatively, I could have completely misunderstood as a new editor. Thank you, GreyGreenWhy (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

That is, in the motions archive, seeing this is a central talk page. Thanks, GreyGreenWhy (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
That is, the four entries in the motion table for 2018 should have '2017' replaced by '2018' in the 'Date enacted' column. EdJohnston (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Surely mere mortals can change this instead of asking clerks to do it? Right? I've fixed it. Thanks, User:GreyGreenWhy. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks both. GreyGreenWhy (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Aliases for arbitration cases[edit]

Following up on the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 36#Community feedback: Proposal on case naming, I created a proof-of-concept template to create aliases for the cases opened in 2017 and 2018. Thus the following wiki markup will result in the following:

Wiki markup Result
{{User:Isaacl/ArbCaseAlias|2017-001}} 2017-001
{{User:Isaacl/ArbCaseAlias|2017001}} 2017001
{{User:Isaacl/ArbCaseAlias|2017-red}} 2017-red
{{User:Isaacl/ArbCaseAlias|2018-002}} 2018-002
{{User:Isaacl/ArbCaseAlias|2018-orange}} 2018-orange
{{User:Isaacl/ArbCaseAlias|Civility in infobox discussions}} Civility in infobox discussions

Module:Sandbox/isaacl/ArbCaseAlias/data contains the lookup table that needs to be kept up to date. So if anyone is eager to start using their own preferred labelling scheme now, it can be done. As an optimization, with this implementation, all of the aliases need to have a common prefix format, such as year. This could be made more flexible, but at the cost of having to search through every single case alias for a match. isaacl (talk) 05:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)