Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations

This is the talk page for discussing Sockpuppet investigations and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

WT:SPI

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25: 14 days

This is not the page to report suspected sock puppetry. Please instead create a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations.

Well done, SPI folk

The outstanding SPI reports are the lowest I've seen the level for a long time. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That has also been my distinct impression when popping by WP:SPI recently. Thanks, everyone! SilverLocust 💬 07:51, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add my appreciation. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Am I a Sockpuppet?

Best regards. I have participated in a page discussing the deletion of an article, and I was accused of evading blocking. Please, I need someone to help me to clarify this defamation, and I do not know how to proceed. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 08:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The supposed 'defamation' relates to possible block evasion way back in 2011. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk · contribs) began editing in June 2011 after Seeker02421 (talk · contribs) was blocked in March 2011. Both editors have a very specific purpose of promoting a specific pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton. There has been no accusation of 'socking'. It is possible that the editors were simply known to each other rather than the same person. It is unlikely that the two editors are entirely unaffiliated.--Jeffro77 Talk 09:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]