Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Vote6L
Appearance
Suggestions
[edit]This is just a modification of Draft E and I, knowing that probably the creators wanted to keep their Draft intact I just created a new one.
My intention was to replace the icons with the Nuvola, but I did not manage using the Click template. I will replace them in the near future, as soon as I have the time to do so.
Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 11:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I changed the icons with Nuvola and Noia. Now all that remains is to find an appropriate one for the health section. I really like the society icon, black and white hands together.
Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 12:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- OK, smaller icons and change colours. Which ones do you suggest? Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 16:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Support
[edit]- I like it. I like the splash of color. However, I think the icons should be smaller, ideally fitting on a single line, as people will most probably look at the recent news and featured articles. Aaronwinborn 03:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- I also like it, primarily because of the colorful icons at the top and the Picture of the Day. I like the colors.Tom 14:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Best so far. I like the category pictures and the inclusion of the POTD frame. Well done, and have my Strong Support. —Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 11:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- You know, this is the best so far. I really like the color icons.
- This is definitely the best of all of the proposed options. Strong Support —Cuiviénen (Cuivië) 01:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- I agree to the others, this is a nice design. I appreciate the "XP-style" icons. --Rev-san 20:09, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- very user friendy,we should get of this DOS-like mentality the general public isn't using it anymore for a reason --Technosphere83 22:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- AOL --84.202.50.75 23:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- I like this one. Although I'd prefer to have the search box yellow (make it even more visibile -- it may blend in with the page), this is a fine draft. The Did You Know? boxes are very clean cut, concise, and otherwise snazzy and sharp. — Ian Manka Talk to me! 04:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Very nice design, clean and not to much information to confuse people. I think the majority of other designs have too much small text which makes the pages confusing and a little ugly. Pjcard 10:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- This one just stands out. Fully support. --^BuGs^ 01:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Looks good.-- JustPhil 13:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- Like it, good use of color EAi 02:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Very nice UI strong support. hcsron
Oppose
[edit]- Frankly, I don't like anything about this one. In the past polls, many have disliked icons and I tend to agree. Those for the Portals are inconsistant, and those for the features need work (you repeat the news and are missing one for the Wikipedia Community). The gold and purple colo scheme is less popular, and so is the form of the header you used. I think the dynamic stuff should have a different box type than the static links. There is no POTD. the "Wikipedia encyclopedia languages with over 1,000 articles" on white while the rest is another color looks bad, though that isn't your draft alone. For your Society icon...perhaps you meant a unity between blacks and whites? The terms are misleading: people are never fully black or white, rather brown or pinkish orange.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 12:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- In the last minutes I have modified a lot the draft, so most of your comments need to be revised. Regarding the icons, I just proposed what i liked the most, I know most of the polls do not agree. As for the society, you must take what I said in the large sense, of course people are NEVER either black or white, it was symbolic. Thanks for the suggestions though, I'll work out a better solution. If you want to, you can edit what you think should be changed, and I'll see your contribution. :-D Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 13:17, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- I still don't like it.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 13:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)