Wikipedia talk:Wikibreak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Essays
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
 High  This page has been rated as High-impact on the project's impact scale.
 
WikiProject Department of Fun (Rated Project-class, Bottom-importance)
WikiProject icon This page is supported by the Department of Fun WikiProject, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the quality scale.
 Bottom  This page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.
 

Bonked: "fucked"[edit]

To bonk, in Australia and perhaps other places, is a colloquial way of saying 'to fuck.' Not sure whether or not this matters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.107.218 (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

WTFLouislee95 (talk) 22:49, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

This refers to the bonked/Fatigued templates, which are about this sort of bonking. Graham87 10:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

need some modifiable templates[edit]

We need some more wikibreak templates in which editors can describe their reasons for taking a wikibreak. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 07:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

The current templates allow you to fill in that information. Viriditas (talk) 10:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I still wish there would be more modifiable wikibreak templates. The template that I used doesn't really describe my situation because I don't consider my status as a "break." --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Really? Because I just tried tone, and it didn't seem to work so well. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 14:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Legitimacy of Wikibreak in Lieu of Block[edit]

When I saw "You've been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See block log," I thought that a Wikibreak would not be a legitimate substitute for a block. I believe it would be tantamount to willfully surrendering a driver's license to evade suspension, which governments deem as prohibited. Z. Patterson (talk) 16:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)