Jump to content

X (Chris Brown album): Revision history

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

13 July 2024

27 June 2024

5 June 2024

31 May 2024

14 May 2024

10 May 2024

30 April 2024

23 April 2024

8 March 2024

7 March 2024

27 February 2024

24 February 2024

20 February 2024

21 January 2024

17 January 2024

12 January 2024

9 January 2024

7 January 2024

30 December 2023

27 October 2023

30 September 2023

  • curprev 01:4401:44, 30 September 2023‎ Instantwatym talk contribs‎ 77,632 bytes −36‎ Editor Aardwolf68 inserted a fabricating 2 out 5 star rating supposedly from a New York Times into the article. The rating is not presenting in the cited review whatsoever. This was pointed out to the editor in a reply on a talk page discussion on this article already. The did the same on another album article (FAME) of the same artist just prior to making this edit and were corrected on that article previously. I have left the quote from the reviewer but removed the fabricated star rating. Tag: Visual edit

9 September 2023

30 August 2023

  • curprev 14:1314:13, 30 August 2023‎ Instantwatym talk contribs‎ 76,051 bytes +149‎ Undid revision 1172921661 by Aardwolf68 (talk) Me reverting an article to its prior state before either you or sockpuppet who is impersonating you edited a specific section, does not mean I agree or support either party. Simply the content is being restored prior to the meddling. You can consider this a content dispute now and you can justify why your new wording should stay on the talk page. If consensus is achieved you can insert. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:0805:08, 30 August 2023‎ Aardwolf68 talk contribs‎ 75,902 bytes −149‎ Undid revision 1172845710 by Instantwatym (talk) Vandalism would be a purposeful spread of wrong information when that's not my intention. There are no "negative reviews" listed on Metacritic but 8 out of the 17 reviews are "mixed" with a number of them leaning negative, That said, ironic that you're accusing me of vandalism when you're siding with known vandals all because you're a Chris Brown fan. Tags: Undo Reverted

29 August 2023

  • curprev 17:5417:54, 29 August 2023‎ Instantwatym talk contribs‎ 76,051 bytes +149‎ Reverting the article to the last edit made by Binksternet. Aardwolf68, acknowledging your own vandlism on the article but letting it persist because you're engaged in an edit war with a sockpuppet/impersonator is pretty ridiculous. Honestly both you and the sockpuppet you keep edit warring with deserve blocks for ruining these articles and wasting other editors time. As time permits, I'll create a noticeboard discussion on your disruptive behavior across various articles. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • curprev 15:0515:05, 29 August 2023‎ Aardwolf68 talk contribs‎ 75,902 bytes −246‎ Undid revision 1172818695 by Aardwolf60 (talk) I will admit my part in being wrong on the negative reviews part, as I considered some of the very low "mixed" scores to in fact be "negative", regardless, reverting undo by blocked user Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 14:1914:19, 29 August 2023‎ Aardwolf60 talk contribs‎ 76,148 bytes +246‎ You are STRAIGHT UP LYING. Open metacritic and read you liar! 6 POSITIVE REVIEWS, 5 MIXED REVIEWS AND 0 NEGATIVE ONES. You are a full grown vandal that should be ashamed of himself and what he's doing on Wikipedia. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 12:0912:09, 29 August 2023‎ Aardwolf68 talk contribs‎ 75,902 bytes −246‎ Undid revision 1172790504 by Aardwolf60 (talk) Your argument lacks nuance. A lot of the reviews for X were mixed, some were negative, with a handful positive. The only reason why Metacritic’s grading scale says positive is because of its weighted average. Wikipedia admins have approved of my changes and your attempts to impersonate me are pathetic and laughable. Enjoy your inevitable ban when this account gets found Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • curprev 09:5809:58, 29 August 2023‎ Aardwolf60 talk contribs‎ 76,148 bytes +246‎ Metacritic said RECEPTION ON THE ALBUM IS POSITIVE. This is what was written on this article before the existence of the sockpuppet you're claiming you're fighting against. All you're doing is using that excuse to put Chris Brown under a bad light for your own sake. Source do not say what you're saying Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 August 2023

  • curprev 09:0809:08, 28 August 2023‎ Aardwolf68 talk contribs‎ 75,902 bytes −149‎ Nice try, just because one unsigned user complained about the content of the article in the talk page, doesn’t mean there was any consensus whatsoever to change this, which was started by a Chris Brown fan trying to make the reception more positive than it is. Better luck next time Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_(Chris_Brown_album)"