Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Semen2.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

• Add {{subst:delete-subst|REASON (mandatory)}} on the page
• Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:Semen2.jpg}}--~~~~
• On the log, add :
  {{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Semen2.jpg}}

Image:Semen2.jpg

•  Delete Are you serious? There's already an image for the article at hand, whomever posted this new picture wants their 5 minutes of fame on Wikipedia. Like others who posted before me stated, no need for duplicate images. --foxdude333 23:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

The image is "redundant through a better but not identical one". Low quality useless work. --Basilicofresco (talk) 16:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Keep Good image. Oven Fresh (talk) 21:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Delete Bad image, low quality, amateur character. Szwedzki (talk) 02:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
  • This admin (Szwedzki) has a history of rule-breaking. Now he requires against the idea of Wikimedia Commons that images should be professionally made in every aspect.Richiex (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Delete The other image is more medically appealing and helpful, then opposed to what looks like a stain on a couch. Smooth0707 (talk) 02:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Delete - Basically in concurrence with Smooth0707's comments. Is this a puddle of semen, a close up of a small amount, or how much semen is this? -- Guroadrunner (talk) 12:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC) ( w:User:Guroadrunner )
•  Keep --Johney (T∀LK) 09:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep Nothing wrong with this.99.246.183.10 06:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Delete This is the mockery. --Starscream (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

---

Deleted. --Szczepan talk  00:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)