User contributions for BozMo
Appearance
A user with 14,161 edits. Account created on 5 April 2004.
21 January 2024
- 20:5620:56, 21 January 2024 diff hist +192 Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 17 →Category:Wikipedia CD Selection: rem
17 July 2023
- 16:1416:14, 17 July 2023 diff hist +330 Talk:Gays Against Groomers →Far-right: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:0716:07, 17 July 2023 diff hist +8 m Gays Against Groomers {{fact}}Far right is a subjective opinion and needs a much better source: find one
28 March 2023
- 16:3816:38, 28 March 2023 diff hist 0 Feminist views on transgender topics I have read all of the listed references and none of them support the word “most” rather than “many”.
28 February 2023
- 08:2108:21, 28 February 2023 diff hist +1 m The Adventure of the Greek Interpreter →Film and television: typo
3 January 2023
- 18:5718:57, 3 January 2023 diff hist +689 Talk:Helen Joyce →Suggestion?: hmm but
- 17:0217:02, 3 January 2023 diff hist +1,183 Talk:Helen Joyce Well, since you asked
31 December 2022
- 14:4514:45, 31 December 2022 diff hist +501 Talk:Helen Joyce →Suggestion?: not convinced
12 December 2022
- 21:4521:45, 12 December 2022 diff hist +173 Talk:Helen Joyce →Suggestion?: come off it thats absurd
7 December 2022
- 07:3807:38, 7 December 2022 diff hist −2,458 Helen Joyce See talk; no disagreement to this change in a month, improves flow. Tag: Reverted
14 November 2022
- 21:3221:32, 14 November 2022 diff hist +3 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Definition: grammar with or from a view, not on it
6 November 2022
- 10:0510:05, 6 November 2022 diff hist +748 Talk:Helen Joyce Proposed change
21 October 2022
- 13:4613:46, 21 October 2022 diff hist −46 m Anglicanism This is way too complicated as an intro, simplify
18 October 2022
- 14:5714:57, 18 October 2022 diff hist −1 m Tower Heist Fix ambiguity
16 October 2022
- 10:4910:49, 16 October 2022 diff hist +8 m Sport Better be clear not spectators
10 October 2022
- 20:1220:12, 10 October 2022 diff hist −556 Catholic Church in England and Wales Really hard to see the relevance of this to the article title, and it is in the lede
- 20:0820:08, 10 October 2022 diff hist −4 m Catholic Church in England and Wales →Reign of Elizabeth I: tweak
- 20:0320:03, 10 October 2022 diff hist 0 m Catholic Church in England and Wales →Reign of Mary I: bistorians>historians
- 19:4619:46, 10 October 2022 diff hist 0 m Catholic Church in England and Wales Reverse order of paragraphs for flow
- 19:4319:43, 10 October 2022 diff hist +223 Catholic Church in England and Wales See talk, this brief bit is a part of the narrative
- 19:2919:29, 10 October 2022 diff hist 0 m Talk:Catholic Church in England and Wales →quick question: typos
- 19:2819:28, 10 October 2022 diff hist +424 Talk:Catholic Church in England and Wales Question
- 17:5517:55, 10 October 2022 diff hist −1 m Mathematics Its<>was not were
- 17:0617:06, 10 October 2022 diff hist −279 Dunning–Kruger effect Rem: This lede paragraph does not reflect the much better sourced section on criticism later in the article
- 17:0217:02, 10 October 2022 diff hist 0 m Dunning–Kruger effect Correct tense
- 17:0017:00, 10 October 2022 diff hist −135 m Surgeon →Pioneer surgeons: and one more
- 16:5916:59, 10 October 2022 diff hist −52 m Surgeon →Pioneer surgeons: same red listing
- 16:5816:58, 10 October 2022 diff hist −49 m Surgeon →Pioneer surgeons: don’t list people without an article, request an article is notable
8 October 2022
- 17:3517:35, 8 October 2022 diff hist −109 Surgeon →Pioneer surgeons: delete..we dont list red links: establish notability in an article on the subject, then we list
- 16:5816:58, 8 October 2022 diff hist +6 m Occam's razor Match summary to text below
- 07:4807:48, 8 October 2022 diff hist −9 m Northumbria →Roman and post-Roman Britain: “in fact” bad style
- 07:4707:47, 8 October 2022 diff hist +2 m Northumbria →Ealdormen and earldoms of Northumbria: no date given so hard to know if Wessex was still a Kingdom at this point
- 07:4307:43, 8 October 2022 diff hist −4 m Northumbria →Possible Celtic British origins: grammar
- 07:4207:42, 8 October 2022 diff hist +1 m Northumbria →Possible Celtic British origins: punc
4 October 2022
- 20:0820:08, 4 October 2022 diff hist +2 m Gender-affirming surgery Corr grammar
- 20:0420:04, 4 October 2022 diff hist −18 m London Stansted Airport →Overview: this does seem to be the correct name
- 19:3819:38, 4 October 2022 diff hist +2 m Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers That<>which correction
- 19:3619:36, 4 October 2022 diff hist −1 m Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers AFAICT pioneers is a verbal adjective generally without the apostrophe
- 19:2219:22, 4 October 2022 diff hist −6 m James Anderton →Cyril Smith: I have read the reference given carefully and it definitely does not include the word young here
- 19:0919:09, 4 October 2022 diff hist +5 m James Anderton →Early life and career: more grammar
- 19:0819:08, 4 October 2022 diff hist −1 m James Anderton →Early life and career: no apostrophe here
- 19:0719:07, 4 October 2022 diff hist +1 m James Anderton →Early life and career: corr spending
2 October 2022
- 19:1619:16, 2 October 2022 diff hist +309 Haverhill, Suffolk Ref
- 19:1319:13, 2 October 2022 diff hist +75 Haverhill, Suffolk →Schools: will put reference on talk for someone to sort out
- 18:4618:46, 2 October 2022 diff hist +1 m Stereopsis Correct what> which
- 18:4418:44, 2 October 2022 diff hist −13 m Stereopsis Readability “due to the fact that” > because
- 18:4118:41, 2 October 2022 diff hist +1 m Blue shark Basic grammar that/which. This is not a defining clause
- 18:3918:39, 2 October 2022 diff hist +1 m Chess Readability comma
27 September 2022
- 21:4221:42, 27 September 2022 diff hist +6 m Oxyhydrogen →Properties: again clarify
- 21:4021:40, 27 September 2022 diff hist +24 m Oxyhydrogen →Properties: spell out