User talk:TJBlackwell
August 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Triplestop x3 22:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much indeed for kindly adding your images to Bramhope Tunnel. It adds another perspective and contributes to our understanding of the portal. It also contributes to the understanding of English Heritage, who just used a photo instead of an onsite survey to list the building. Their listing description says there is "probably" a turret on the left but they can't see it behind the vegetation.
To clarify the August 2009 message above - to my understanding the general principle is that you don't put external links in an article page's main text, as it's often difficult to differentiate between spam and useful links, especially where bots are used to remove spam. However, appropriate external links are welcomed in the "External Links" section at the bottom. If there is no external links section, make one. When I created the Bramhope Tunnel page I included a link to your Flickr site in the external links section because it contained photos that could not be obtained anywhere else.
It's the unfortunate style of Wikipedia that when you first join and start contributing, your talk page gets filled up with tellings-off because, although you have good intentions, you are new and are making beginner errors. It's the same for all of us. Sadly, this puts off a lot of useful contributors. But if you learn from it and keep going, after a while the stream of reprimands dries up and you start getting thank-yous. If you don't agree with or understand a tag or telling-off, it's well worth putting a polite message on the sender's talkpage, and you will almost always get a friendly reply and helpful advice. Here's something I didn't find out for ages: in general, you can remove almost any tag from an article once you have put the problem right. The main exception to this is the speedy deletion tag - but that one says in so many words that you can't remove it - though it does tell you how you can appeal.
Hope that helps - we need good contributors like yourself. Thanks again for adding the pics.--Storye book (talk) 09:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Cheers TJ. Actually I'd been thinking of starting an article on Brunswick Tunnel. The pictures are missing from that link now however there are some here so there are two references to link to as evidence. But at the moment I'm held up with another job. I'm no expert on trains and tunnels so if you feel like starting the page, let me know and I could weigh in and do just those bits of tidying which prevent new pages from being tagged and deleted. Don't know if you've started new articles yet - but the main tactic to avoid deletion is to have an intro that says "Brunswick Tunnel is a so-and-so and it is notable for so-and-so". We don't have pictures for the article, but we could get a photo of that plaque in Harrogate near Trinity church, and of the island in the road in Harrogate where the tunnel-end is underneath. There is more information here. But no pressure - just thought it might interest you. If nothing else it's a good read. Cheers.--Storye book (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Haha - I've just spotted the dog in File:Trainspotters Atop Bramhope Tunnel.jpg. I'm a bit slow these days . . .--Storye book (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Otley Panorama.jpg missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Dear Sfan00: Author information for that shot has been duly updated - if you want further proof that I am the content creator, check out the EXIF details and cross reference them to any of the images on my Flickr photostream. Thanks! --TJBlackwell (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Hope you can see this Tom
[edit]I'm not sure that I'll ever find your reply but have clicked the "Watch this Page"
Would you be interested in perhaps contributing your photos to another (free) website? I like the quality and especially the variety in them.
If you prefer to email for details, I am david (at) gentlydoes.it
Thanks WhiskyGolf (talk) 11:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)