Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Long-billed Corella.jpg
Appearance
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Long-billed_Corella.jpg/250px-Long-billed_Corella.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/Long-billed_Corella_edit1.jpg/250px-Long-billed_Corella_edit1.jpg)
- Reason
- A high quality image of a Long-billed Corella. It seems to fit the appropriate criteria.
- Articles this image appears in
- Long_billed_corella, Cockatoo, Licmetis
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 04:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Capital photographer (talk) 11:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oversharpened and on the small side. Nice picture otherwise. --Dschwen 12:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comments Please do not just remove discussions from a nomination. If you feel it does not belong there, then re-direct it elsewhere. Muhammad(talk) 18:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Muhammad. I know its easy to just say you support as per the nom, but it is expected that you provide a reason, just the same as an oppose. In this case it won't matter, but in some controversial noms it is important for obtaining consensus. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support somewhat creepy. --Meldshal42 (talk) 19:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good Photo worthy of FP. --Mifter (talk) 20:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support nice picture, well done. —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:39, 2 July 2008
- Support really sharp and the colours are great --Childzy ¤ Talk 22:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Support. I don't like the background, and I agree with Dschwen that it's slightly oversharpened, but it's still feature-worthy. NauticaShades 00:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Rj1020 (talk) 02:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support for aesthetic appeal, the colours are gorgeous. It is also somewhat creepy, giving it an additional odd appeal. I think a lot of people would click on the image on the main page. --Blechnic (talk) 06:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
*Comment The body looks like a big white blob, can this be fixed? Greener Cactus (talk) 20:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- That depends whether you can fix your display. ;-) The bird's feathers are not overexposed, although they are lacking slightly in texture on the back. I don't believe its a problem with the photography though. Its just the way the feathers look. I have found that you can make the texture more visible if you apply about 20% highlight reduction in the Photoshop Shadows/Highlights tool. I'll upload it as an edit and let others decide. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 21:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support edit 1 looks much better, now it looks more like a bird than a snowball.Greener Cactus (talk) 07:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Long-billed Corella.jpg MER-C 07:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)