Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reda Hafez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unsourced BLP Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reda Hafez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. I tagged it as such but the tags got removed. Links in the article are not related to the subject directly: they are either self-published or links to forums or homepages that do not mention the subject. Abanima (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, in case the community agree that this article should be deleted, please consider also its clones on creator's personal and talk pages.--Abanima (talk) 10:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern about the article, but why should we worry what the user puts on his user and talk pages? --Joshuaism (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Because the Project:Biographies of living persons policy applies to every namespace, not just the encyclopaedic content namespaces. Userspace drafts are not magically free from the rules. Of course, simple blanking is sufficient for a user page or a user talk page, no use of the deletion tool required. Uncle G (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All awards appear to be limited to those awarded in his academic studies. No inline citations of sources are provided. None of the sources provided are RS. Nothing provided suggests Reda Hafez can meet the WP:ARTIST guideline. --Joshuaism (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.