Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Female Purple Finch

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2011 at 10:22:29 (UTC)

Reason: Obvious EV and quality, great composition. Provides a wonderful contrast to the shot of the male (nominated below).
Articles in which this image appears: Purple Finch
FP category for this image: Animals/Birds
Creator: Cephas

Support as nominator --J Milburn (talk) 10:22, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the background. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 13:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. What's wrong with the background? --KFP (contact | edits) 13:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would say much of it is too similar in colour to the bird. --Avenue (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...But, but that's where the bird lives. Nice bokeh and nothing distracting. --KFP (contact | edits) 18:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support JJ Harrison (talk) 06:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad lighting and posture --ka ʁs tn 11:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Carschten and Ebe123. --Avenue (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I do like this and think it fits the criteria - Peripitus (Talk) 11:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The background enhances the view of the bird. Harrison49 (talk) 21:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A very fine picture, nothing wrong with the background, the posture o the lighting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Alvesgaspar. I don't really understand the objections above. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Defiantly, I see no problems with the lighting or posture as it shows the profile of the bird perfectly. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 16:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and EV. Spencer^T♦C 02:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Carpodacus purpureus CT4.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]