Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:USA 10096-7-8 HDR Antelope Canyon Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg

Upper Antelope Canyon[edit]

Reason: True we already have an FP of Lower Antelope Canyon, but this one is of higher res, has a person for scale and IMO depicts a more interesting scene. Technical quality is also very good in terms of sharpness and handling of the challenging lighting involved.
Articles this image appears in: Antelope Canyon
Creator: Lucag

Support as nominator Fir0002 11:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks so unbelievably great that it looks fake. Good quality. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Some technical problems, but who cares, it looks stunning. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-12-22 21:47Z
Support. Well done. - Darwinek (talk) 10:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps you could fit it into erosion, too?--Here T oHelp 21:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - One word: Beautiful. Booksworm ^{Sprechen-sie Koala?} 10:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Reminds me of Petra! Although the ground looks a little funky in full dimension, it's still awesome. Nice job.--DMCer (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I can't believe this isn't a FP already. --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 13:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support Very beautiful picture, amazing quality, nice all around. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s ^{(Merry Christmas!)} 17:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow H92110 (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 05:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support While encyclopedic, the technical issues due to the subtle hues of the stone and the overall "brownish" color are noticeable to the trained eye. --Shark face 217 23:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:USA 10096-7-8 HDR Antelope Canyon Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg MER-C 02:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]