Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Passiflora caerulea (makro close-up).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2015 at 11:38:41 (UTC)

Support as nominator – PetarM (talk) 11:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ineligible, has not yet been 7 days on the page. Nice image though, is it focus stacked? --Janke | Talk 12:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One more rule to be changed here (beside that for image size which doesn't take in aspect very wide objects, so thing in big resolution fall short because limit is put in size, not in megapixles as it should be), I didn't know it must be 7 days on page. Yes stacking, all in description. 17 photos.--PetarM (talk) 20:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support the 7-day rule is more honoured in the breach than the observance; the shadows would normally curse it for me, but I think they are quite attractive here, and the structure of the flower is nicely illustrated from this angle. Belle (talk) 16:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 08:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice choice. Brandmeister^talk 14:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo of a striking flower. Presumably the closing admin will verify that it is still in the article before promoting? HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 22:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per my (!vote at Commons. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Passiflora caerulea (makro close-up).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image was in Passiflora caerulea during closure. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]