User talk:Micromobile
Spam in Microsoft Mobile Tug of War[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Microsoft Mobile Tug of War, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Microsoft Mobile Tug of War is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Microsoft Mobile Tug of War, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- I saw your comment "I really need to post it in wikipedia because this is my group project that is due Monday". What blatant cheek! Wikipedia is not a free host. Post it by Monday by all means but do so on your own website. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm afraid to say I must agree with RHaworth here - we are an encyclopedia, not a free webhost. That article looks like advertising, and in any case it's not written from a neutral point of view, and is not really something you'd expect to find in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, for instance. I understand you have a project to complete here, and if you wish, I can provide you with a copy of the deleted page. Sorry about this, but there's not much I can do to help. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 10:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- OK, check your email inbox for a message with "Wikipedia email" in the subject. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 15:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm afraid to say I must agree with RHaworth here - we are an encyclopedia, not a free webhost. That article looks like advertising, and in any case it's not written from a neutral point of view, and is not really something you'd expect to find in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, for instance. I understand you have a project to complete here, and if you wish, I can provide you with a copy of the deleted page. Sorry about this, but there's not much I can do to help. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 10:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)