User talk:WowWashington

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WowWashington. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cabayi (talk) 20:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WowWashington (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know anything about these other accounts when referencing sockpuppetry and even stepped away from the site because they would not clarify if the block was for that puppetry or that I posted a warning for esobarinc because I'm a customer and I have not yet received the phone I paid for in over 3 months. It was not demeaning, it was not false, it was a statement "A customer ordered this and has not yet received it". One of the mods stated I was sock puppetry for saying bad things against this company on a page that already said their new phone was a cheap rip off of samsung, rebranded samsung etc, I was only putting a caution without being defamitory. However there's public statements of my issues from known Youtubers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns8ydpZ5-4o . Following the block of me stating non-encyclopeida content, I agree, I won't post bad things without provable facts. But I know nothing about the puppetry thing, had not heard of it until I get the mail from my single edit to the esobarinc page. BUT today I get two more mails even though I'm locked out stating i'm still doing puppetry. I'm not, I'm a Microsoft Employee who wanted to give a warning on a product, and don't have time to build multiple accounts and do whatever they said is going on with the other accounts. .

I don't have multiple accounts. I'm on a comcast network but no one in the family that I'm aware of uses Wikipedia.org, and no one has tried to deal with escobarinc.

Also I got email saying jpgordon left a message and I don't see it.

Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/WowWashington/Archive it's listed I'm in a different geo than the known sock puppet, and that i'm unlikely to be one yet I was blocked with no notice and originally unable to edit this page (at least that's what it seemed like) I did not destroy any content on the page as per the archive text, I added a sentence or two regarding my purchase and not having the product after months. The sock puppetry comments refers to "trying to destroy evidence on Escobar Inc artcle" - I believe my edit history would show that's not true. if I recall correctly I typed in my comment, then moved it to another part of the page, I did not modify/change/alter any other items on the page.

The confusing part is I was banned for sock puppetry which is having multiple accounts yet my interaction with Cabayi was to not posted non-helpful stuff on the escobar page yet saying it was sock puppetry.

Here's his statement ""I am sorry, but I cannot unblock you. You have not addressed the reason for your block, which is sockpuppetry. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry) - ¶ -- ¶ -- ¶ - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It has no interest in commentary or complaints about a subject. We are not interested in personal experience or opinion. To be unblocked, you would need to address the sockpuppetry and describe what constructive edits you would make. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:42 for sourcing requirements for this encyclopedia. - ¶ -- ¶ -- ¶ - I would recommend that you agree to not edit about Escobar Inc. due to your obvious conflict of interest." https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cabayi

Decline reason:

I have no idea what you're talking about, and I can't make sense of this. Please make a new unblock request using proper English grammar. I can't make sense of this stream-of-consciousness rant. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WowWashington (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I'm not using multiple accounts, (Admins) you can see the email of my WowWashington account goes to my personal domain, why would a sock puppetery person burn their domain that they've had for years. Caybayi stated my post to escobarinc was sock puppetry(!?!?). It was not, I posted one statement that I ordered a phone from escobar and had not received it. After that I was blamed for having a bias against escobar and using multiple accounts. Your investigation page states my account is of a diffrent geo and if you look at my edits there was no destructive action. I agree with Cabayi that I shouldn't have posted a personal interaction with this company. As for the sock puppetry I have nothing to do with that, I have only this account and if it's not unblocked then please stop the constant mails to my personal mail with follow-ups that continue to blame my account for puppetry.

Decline reason:

Declining request as stale only; when you are able to engage with us and respond to the comment below, you may make a new request. 331dot (talk) 10:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your relation to the Blusocksblu account? You said above that you got email saying jpgordon left a message. jpgordon indeed left a message at User talk:Blusocksblu [1]. So, please don't say you have no connection. Tell us the truth. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]