User talk:InShaneee

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived to User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Jun07.

Click here to start a new talk section.

• Archive - May 06
• Archive - June 06
• Archive - July 06
• Archive - August 06
• Archive - September 06
• Archive - October 06
• Archive - November 06
• Archive - December 06
• Archive - January 07

Block

Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/InShaneee_2. Worldtraveller 00:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll continue to raise questions about your conduct. All I want is for you to explain why you blocked someone you were having a dispute with, with nothing in WP:BP to support the block. More than a month has passed and you still won't engage in any dialogue whatsoever. Why is this? Worldtraveller 01:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The following is from my talk page - perhaps you didn't see it there. Worldtraveller 22:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

---

Since that was more calmly worded, I'll be glad to answer you. While I continue to frown on your conduct in the matter, I will admit that I jumped the gun with the block, and it was something that I should have sought outside input on; for that I do apologize. Part of it was also, as was mentioned before, that to me, it seemed to be a 'drive-by' by an anon. Had I seen that it was an established user, I would have been much more quick to attempt to begin a dialouge. In the future, though, know that it is polite to raise the question of whether a tag belong or not before you simply remove it; since they are placed by Wikiprojects, they do not always have the luxury of responding quickly to these types of things, or even noticing them in many instances. I hope this helps with the situation. --InShaneee 01:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Finally. Why has it taken you so long to respond? I made many requests on your talk page and each one was totally ignored.

You may well frown on my conduct. I also frown on yours. However, that doesn't justify blocking me at all. You haven't explained the following points:

1. Which bit of WP:BP did you think applied to the situation?
2. Why did you block someone who you were having a content dispute with when this is strictly forbidden?
3. Why did you not respond to criticism of your actions?

By the way, I apologise that your refusal to even acknowledge my questions pushed me into saying this. Worldtraveller 12:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Josh d

Regarding attack articles like the above, please be careful in the future to remove the automatic deletion summary before finalizing the deletion in order not to perpetuate the damaging information in the deletion logs that are visible to everyone and that even oversight cannot remove. Thanks. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 20:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Kill Your President

Hey man, why was my page deleted? It is an actual band. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mintoisgod (talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC).

Invite,toolbox

Place your name in the "Favorite Admin" listings and make a copy of my toolbox. Martial Law 03:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Golfore

dont delete my words golfore that is a new term that i coined just as renaissance writers coined new terms all the time and you do not delete those words. You have noob on here which is also slang in case you havent noticed. Why should you have more power than I do, are you better than me, no you are human(i think) just like the rest of us.

dude

what's the deal?

I AM NEW TO THE SERVER! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The-dsu (talk • contribs).

HELP, please!

ZakuSage has now started an organized campaign to keep sticking his harassment pages back into my user space over and over again. This is beyond ridiculous. RunedChozo 20:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

There is no "organized campaign". No such thing is in his userspace. This user is entirely out of line, and I'd like something to be done about him. - ZakuSage 20:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

RunedChozo and ZakuSage

Hope you're about, these two editors have now become involved in an edit war over ZakuSage's attempts to place RunedChozo on the list of suspected sock puppets page. RunedChozo even moved the material into the main article namespace. Since you commented on the noticeboard earlier in their argument, thought you might be able to/want to do something about it before it escalates further. Thanks. QmunkE 20:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I've already moved the things out of the main namespace one Qmunk informed me that was wrong. I'm trying to deal with ZakuSage who just keeps harassing me over and over again, deliberately lying about me too. RunedChozo 20:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

You consistently moved sockpuppet report into MY userspace. Most of this is visable in the history of that article, and some is now visable here after an accident while moving it. - ZakuSage 20:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

No, I made a mistake because YOU kept leaving a confusing trail of redirects, and I apologized for that on the proper evidence page, and fixed the error as soon as I saw it again. Stop your lying ZakuSage. RunedChozo 20:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

What you did was clear and blatant vandalism. STOP THE LIES! - ZakuSage 20:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not the one lying, ZakuLiar. RunedChozo 20:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Runed, I hope your break last for a while, because if you come back and continue your accusations, it will become an enforced break. Zaku, if you touch Runed's userspace, make one more accusation against him, or call him a 'liar' or anything else, you will be blocked IMMEDIATLY. This ends here. --InShaneee 21:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the continued drama, but I actually haven't touched his userspace since the first day of this mess. I apologize sincerely for my actions and will be sure to avoid this user in the future. - ZakuSage 02:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Fadix

InShaneee, could you please take a look at this: [1] The action is too slow, whilst he continues to harass by constantly reverting all edits he dislikes. --AdilBaguirov 02:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

could you please take a look, as it's not ending, but getting worse: [2] Thanks. --AdilBaguirov 02:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Rogue Admin or not...

Rogue Admin or not, this award is for you:

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		This is for making Wikipedia a better website for all and for assissting me repeatedly. Martial Law 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Martial Law 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Also list yourself in my listings of Favorite Admins and make yourself a copy of my toolbox. Martial Law 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Madmod.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Madmod.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Sinosphere

Hi there, I posted a notice about Sinosphere article on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive192. I wonder if you are gonna to do something about it. Thanks. Migye 19:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

u bugging me

but They didnt change it back... someone else removed it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jeremybub (talk • contribs) 21:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC).

Criticism and response in parapsychology

I've been advised to create a sandbox for the Criticism and response in parapsychology article. It's here, renamed to Controversy in parapsychology. I'm not sure if people want to edit under my user page, or edit the main article. But, if it's decided to edit the sandbox, It would be great to have your input. I won't be editing in the beginning, while I see what format people want to use etc. I'm putting this on several talk pages. Martin^phi _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 05:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Uncivil remarks

I know you're busy! When you get a breath, give me a shout! Dreadlocke ☥ 22:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps

Perhaps you'd like to speak to the officers in charge of the case? I never once used the word pedophile anywhere ever in my statements to anyone. Reporting WikiStalking to admins doesn't get you banned, never has, especially when you have (And so do the admins) the ip addresses to back up claims of wikistalking and sockpuppetry. LexiLynn 19:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Can't really deal descreetly with anything once they follow me onto the internet. this is called wikistalking. I thought admins new about it. LexiLynn 21:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Shane, I am SO sorry to drag you back into this, but you may want to take a look at my entry in the Admins Noticeboard again. I am content to drop this matter, but LexiLynn is continuing with allegations of "court documents". Ispy1981 05:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Archive names

If you "edit this page" and look at your Werdnabot invocation, you will see that you have hard coded the year to be "06". Obviously, then it will alway be "06" until you change that. This is not a bug in Werdnabot itself, it is a bug in your invocation of it. JRSpriggs 06:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Personal Attack

The user barefact made a personal attack: [3]. I warned the user to stop his personal attack:[4]. He still persisted even more: [5]. --alidoostzadeh 11:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Ali doostzadeh complaint about deceptive removal of contents

Dear Chicagoland, I fully appreciate your comment and completely support the concept about personal attacks. There are instanses when the unrestrained deceptive editing should be called for what they are, deceptive editing. You may note that Ali doostzadeh brings upon himself numerous independent complaints about his racistic, militant and deceptive editing, which he brings up as personal attacks. In my response I offered him an independent arbitrage, I offered it many times and on many subjects, but he always declined a neutral resolution. I would gladly submit to your review of this dispute, and I am sure it would be clear to any observer that Ali doostzadeh's editing grossly conflict with his deceptive explanations. The Iranian group was already found as acting in bad faith in this article, and the same participants are engaged in stealthy but militant removal of contents and restoration of dismissive tags already deleted by admins. Barefact 20:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Authentic Leadership

Hi, how can I make a page for "Authentic Leadership" without seeming like it's advertising? I am new at this.

Joe 415 472 2049 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jchung14 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

Rumble in the Jungle

I notice you deleted my updated RitJ page. The reason I created it is explained on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Rumble_in_the_Jungle">at the bottom of the discussion page of the original article</a>. Basically the page is such a mess, factually and stylistically, that I wanted to have a sandbox where I could make large edits without actually replacing the old page until I was done with the article. It's possible there is a better/accepted way of doing this; if so please let me know as I am new at this. Until then I am reinstating my page.RaulGroom 22:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)