Husband stitch: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Popular culture: Added example plus replaced IMDb ref due Wikipedia:Citing IMDb
Bcht12 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: nowiki added Visual edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Procedure where excess stitches are used to repair perineal damage, in order to tighten the vagina}}
{{Short description|Procedure where excess stitches are used to repair perineal damage, in order to tighten the vagina}}
The '''husband stitch''' or '''husband's stitch''',<ref name="Kitzinger1994">{{cite book|title=The Year After Childbirth|last1=Kitzinger|first1=Sheila|date=1994|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0192177841|edition=1st|location=Oxford|page=71|author-link=Sheila Kitzinger}}</ref> also known as the '''daddy stitch''',<ref name=Vinopal/> '''husband's knot''' and '''vaginal tuck''',<ref name=Dobbeleir/> is a surgical procedure in which one or more additional [[Surgical suture|sutures]] than necessary are used to repair a woman's [[perineum]] after it has [[Perineal tear|been torn]] or [[episiotomy|cut during childbirth]].{{efn|"Vaginal tightening surgery has been around since the mid fifties, where gynecologists used to tighten the entrance of a woman's vagina with an extra stitch while repairing vaginal and perineum tears or episiotomies after giving birth. At that time it was notoriously known as the 'husband's stitch', the 'husband's knot', or the 'vaginal tuck', and doctors discreetly referred to this procedure as 'improving a woman's well-being'."<ref name=Dobbeleir>{{cite journal|last1=Dobbeleir|first1=Julie M. L. C. L.|last2=Van Landuyt|first2=Koenraad|last3=Monstrey|first3=Stan J.|title=Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia|journal=Seminars in Plastic Surgery|date=May 2011|volume=25|issue=2|pages=130–41|doi=10.1055/s-0031-1281482|pmid=22547970|pmc=3312147}}</ref>}} The claimed purpose is to tighten the opening of the [[vagina]] and thereby enhance the pleasure of her male sex partner during [[penetrative intercourse]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Braun|first1=Virginia|last2=Kitzinger|first2=Celia|title=The perfectible vagina: Size matters|journal=Culture, Health & Sexuality|date=January 2001|volume=3|issue=3|pages=263–277|doi=10.1080/13691050152484704|citeseerx=10.1.1.552.8931|s2cid=143982758}}</ref> Evidence for the benefit of the woman is lacking.<ref name=Kitzinger1994/>
The '''husband stitch''' or '''husband's stitch''',<ref name="Kitzinger1994">{{cite book|title=The Year After Childbirth|last1=Kitzinger|first1=Sheila|date=1994|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0192177841|edition=1st|location=Oxford|page=71|author-link=Sheila Kitzinger}}</ref> also known as the '''daddy stitch''',<ref name=Vinopal/> '''husband's knot''' and '''vaginal tuck''',<ref name=Dobbeleir/> is a surgical procedure in which one or more additional [[Surgical suture|sutures]] than necessary are used to repair a woman's [[perineum]] after it has [[Perineal tear|been torn]] or [[episiotomy|cut during childbirth]].{{efn|"Vaginal tightening surgery has been around since the mid fifties, where gynecologists used to tighten the entrance of a woman's vagina with an extra stitch while repairing vaginal and perineum tears or episiotomies after giving birth. At that time it was notoriously known as the 'husband's stitch', the 'husband's knot', or the 'vaginal tuck', and doctors discreetly referred to this procedure as 'improving a woman's well-being'."<ref name=Dobbeleir>{{cite journal|last1=Dobbeleir|first1=Julie M. L. C. L.|last2=Van Landuyt|first2=Koenraad|last3=Monstrey|first3=Stan J.|title=Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia|journal=Seminars in Plastic Surgery|date=May 2011|volume=25|issue=2|pages=130–41|doi=10.1055/s-0031-1281482|pmid=22547970|pmc=3312147}}</ref>}} The claimed purpose is to tighten the opening of the [[vagina]] and thereby enhance the pleasure of her male sex partner during [[penetrative intercourse]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Braun|first1=Virginia|last2=Kitzinger|first2=Celia|title=The perfectible vagina: Size matters|journal=Culture, Health & Sexuality|date=January 2001|volume=3|issue=3|pages=263–277|doi=10.1080/13691050152484704|citeseerx=10.1.1.552.8931|s2cid=143982758}}</ref> The Husband stitch was for long considered an urban legen, but since then, numerous reports have interviewed witnesses, both patients and doctors.


==Medical perspective==
==Medical perspective==
While repair of the perineum may be medically necessary, an extra stitch is not, and may cause discomfort or pain.<ref name="Vinopal">{{cite web |last1=Vinopal |first1=Lauren |title=Who's Afraid of the 'Husband Stitch'? New Moms Everywhere |url=https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/why-parents-fear-husband-stitch/ |website=Fatherly |date=17 August 2017 |access-date=15 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171016070105/https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/why-parents-fear-husband-stitch/ |archive-date=16 October 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Ritschel|first1=Chelsea|title=The 'Husband Stitch' During Episiotomy Repair is a Disturbing Reality for Many New Mothers|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/husband-stitch-episiotomy-misogyny-motherhood-pregnancy-surgery-stitch-sexism-childbirth-a8184346.html|work=The Independent|date=29 January 2018|access-date=9 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180207220039/http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/husband-stitch-episiotomy-misogyny-motherhood-pregnancy-surgery-stitch-sexism-childbirth-a8184346.html|archive-date=7 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Use of the term in the medical literature can be traced to ''Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association'' in 1885.{{efn|"Dr. Geo. Cupples was called upon to explain the 'Husband Stitch,' which he did as follows: He said that when he was stitching up a ruptured perineum, of a married lady, the husband was an anxious and interested observer, and when he had taken all the stitches necessary, the husband peeped over his shoulders and said, 'Dr., can't you take another stitch?' and he did, and called it the 'Husband Stitch'."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association|volume=Seventeenth Annual Session|date=21–23 April 1885|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mZ0RAAAAYAAJ&q=%22husband+stitch%22&pg=PA43|publisher=Texas State Medical Association|location=Houston, Texas}}</ref>}} The term is also referenced in ''What Women Want to Know'' (1958).{{efn|"Such a problem confronted a colleague of mine, whose pregnant patient asked him before delivery if he would please put in what she referred to as 'her husband's stitch'. It turned out that she wanted him to tighten up her vagina somewhat, so that it would revert to its original state. The doctor took her at her word and, following delivery of her fourth baby, performed a [[Perineoplasty|perineorrhaphy]]. This operation has the effect of tightening the sphincter and rendering the introitus somewhat smaller.{{pb}}"Unhappily, the patient and her husband decided that the 'stitch' had been made too tight, was unsatisfactory, and sued the doctor for malpractice, asking something in the neighborhood of a hundred thousand dollars. The doctor won his case, though not without difficulty, and it was a genuine legal battle despite the humorous implications of the issue."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Imerman|first1=Harold M.|last2=Dewey|first2=Thomas Blanchard|title=What Women Want to Know: A Noted Gynecologist's Guide to the Personal Problems of Women's Health|date=1958|publisher=Crown|location=New York|page=134}}</ref>}}
While repair of the perineum may be medically necessary, an extra stitch is not, and may cause discomfort or pain.<ref name="Vinopal">{{cite web |last1=Vinopal |first1=Lauren |title=Who's Afraid of the 'Husband Stitch'? New Moms Everywhere |url=https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/why-parents-fear-husband-stitch/ |website=Fatherly |date=17 August 2017 |access-date=15 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171016070105/https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/why-parents-fear-husband-stitch/ |archive-date=16 October 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Ritschel|first1=Chelsea|title=The 'Husband Stitch' During Episiotomy Repair is a Disturbing Reality for Many New Mothers|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/husband-stitch-episiotomy-misogyny-motherhood-pregnancy-surgery-stitch-sexism-childbirth-a8184346.html|work=The Independent|date=29 January 2018|access-date=9 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180207220039/http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/husband-stitch-episiotomy-misogyny-motherhood-pregnancy-surgery-stitch-sexism-childbirth-a8184346.html|archive-date=7 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Use of the term in the medical literature can be traced to ''Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association'' in 1885, where a doctor claimed to have performed one.{{efn|"Dr. Geo. Cupples was called upon to explain the 'Husband Stitch,' which he did as follows: He said that when he was stitching up a ruptured perineum, of a married lady, the husband was an anxious and interested observer, and when he had taken all the stitches necessary, the husband peeped over his shoulders and said, 'Dr., can't you take another stitch?' and he did, and called it the 'Husband Stitch'."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association|volume=Seventeenth Annual Session|date=21–23 April 1885|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mZ0RAAAAYAAJ&q=%22husband+stitch%22&pg=PA43|publisher=Texas State Medical Association|location=Houston, Texas}}</ref>}}<blockquote>"Dr. Geo. Cupples was called upon to explain the 'Husband Stitch,' which he did as follows: He said that when he was stitching up a ruptured perineum, of a married lady, the husband was an anxious and interested observer, and when he had taken all the stitches necessary, the husband peeped over his shoulders and said, 'Dr., can't you take another stitch?' and he did, and called it the 'Husband Stitch'."<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.at/books?id=mZ0RAAAAYAAJ&q=%22husband+stitch%22&pg=PA43&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=%22husband%20stitch%22&f=false |title=Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association |date=1885 |publisher=The Association |language=en}}</ref></blockquote>The term is also referenced in ''What Women Want to Know'' (1958),{{efn|"Such a problem confronted a colleague of mine, whose pregnant patient asked him before delivery if he would please put in what she referred to as 'her husband's stitch'. It turned out that she wanted him to tighten up her vagina somewhat, so that it would revert to its original state. The doctor took her at her word and, following delivery of her fourth baby, performed a [[Perineoplasty|perineorrhaphy]]. This operation has the effect of tightening the sphincter and rendering the introitus somewhat smaller.{{pb}}"Unhappily, the patient and her husband decided that the 'stitch' had been made too tight, was unsatisfactory, and sued the doctor for malpractice, asking something in the neighborhood of a hundred thousand dollars. The doctor won his case, though not without difficulty, and it was a genuine legal battle despite the humorous implications of the issue."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Imerman|first1=Harold M.|last2=Dewey|first2=Thomas Blanchard|title=What Women Want to Know: A Noted Gynecologist's Guide to the Personal Problems of Women's Health|date=1958|publisher=Crown|location=New York|page=134}}</ref>}} and in ''The Year After Childbirth: Surviving and Enjoying the First Year of Motherhood,'' written by Sheila Kitzinger in 1994.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kitzinger |first=Sheila |title=The Year After Childbirth: Surviving and Enjoying the First Year of Motherhood |publisher=HarperCollins Canada |year=1994 |isbn=9780002550727}}</ref>


Few studies exist to determine whether the procedure occurs often and how many women have been affected beyond anecdotal evidence.<ref name="healthline">{{cite news|last1=Murphy|first1=Carrie|title=The Husband Stitch Isn't Just a Horrifying Childbirth Myth|url=https://www.healthline.com/health-news/husband-stitch-is-not-just-myth#3|work=Healthline|date=24 January 2018|access-date=2 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180202232940/https://www.healthline.com/health-news/husband-stitch-is-not-just-myth#3|archive-date=2 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Many medical practitioners assert that the procedure is mostly an [[urban legend]], and that much of any truth about the procedure is prone to misunderstanding and false attribution by the public.<ref name="Vinopal"/><!-- Quote = She says that she’s most familiar with the husband stitch as “an urban legend on parenting boards.” Other physicians that spoke with Fatherly agreed. --> Some suggest that it might be a joke made by men to relieve tension after their partners have given birth.<ref name="Vinopal"/> However, there are several accounts of women who claim to have undergone this procedure without their consent.<ref name="healthline"/><ref>{{cite web|last1=Halton|first1=Mary|title=The 'Husband Stitch' Leaves Women in Pain and Without Answers|url=https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/pax95m/the-husband-stitch-real-stories-episiotomy|date=26 April 2018|work=Vice}}</ref>
Few studies exist to determine whether the procedure occurs often and how many women have been affected beyond anecdotal evidence.<ref name="healthline">{{cite news |last1=Murphy |first1=Carrie |date=24 January 2018 |title=The Husband Stitch Isn't Just a Horrifying Childbirth Myth |work=Healthline |url=https://www.healthline.com/health-news/husband-stitch-is-not-just-myth#3 |url-status=live |access-date=2 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180202232940/https://www.healthline.com/health-news/husband-stitch-is-not-just-myth#3 |archive-date=2 February 2018}}</ref> Some medical practitioners have asserted that the procedure is mostly an [[urban legend]], and false attribution,<ref name="Vinopal" /><!-- Quote = She says that she’s most familiar with the husband stitch as “an urban legend on parenting boards.” Other physicians that spoke with Fatherly agreed. --> while others have claimed to know doctors who perform the procedure.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2014-06-24 |title=Le point du mari, un vrai scandale ? - Elle |url=https://www.elle.fr/Societe/News/Le-point-du-mari-un-vrai-scandale-2715288 |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=elle.fr |language=fr}}</ref> The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, acording to a report by Fatherly, does not deny that the procedure happens, while alleging that it “is not standard or common.<ref name="Vinopal" /> Other doctors, such as Jean Marty, head of the Union of Gynecologysts in France, have claimed that the idea of a Husband Stitch comes from botched episiotomies and poor stitching, that lead women to have pain during sexual intercourse and while urinating.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2014-04-18 |title=Derrière le « point du mari », le traumatisme de l'épisiotomie |language=fr |work=Le Monde.fr |url=https://www.lemonde.fr/sante/article/2014/04/18/derriere-le-point-du-mari-le-traumatisme-de-l-episiotomie_4403470_1651302.html |access-date=2023-03-10}}</ref> Episiotomies have become a routine procedure around the world,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hartmann |first=Katherine |last2=Viswanathan |first2=Meera |last3=Palmieri |first3=Rachel |last4=Gartlehner |first4=Gerald |last5=Thorp |first5=John |last6=Lohr |first6=Kathleen N. |date=2005-05-04 |title=Outcomes of Routine EpisiotomyA Systematic Review |url=https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.17.2141 |journal=JAMA |volume=293 |issue=17 |pages=2141–2148 |doi=10.1001/jama.293.17.2141 |issn=0098-7484}}</ref> in spite of studies that claimed it offers no benefits to pregnant people.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth |url=https://www.cochrane.org/CD000081/PREG_selective-versus-routine-use-episiotomy-vaginal-birth |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=www.cochrane.org |language=en}}</ref>

However, there are several accounts of women who claim to have undergone this procedure without their consent.<ref name="healthline" /><ref>{{cite web |last1=Halton |first1=Mary |date=26 April 2018 |title=The 'Husband Stitch' Leaves Women in Pain and Without Answers |url=https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/pax95m/the-husband-stitch-real-stories-episiotomy |work=Vice}}</ref> There have been several journalistic investigations on the existence of the Husband Stitch, trying to determine if it was real. They have overwhelmingly determined that the practice does exist, as seen in reports by Chelsea Ritschel, writing for Healthline,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-02-07 |title=The 'Husband Stitch' during episiotomy repair is a disturbing reality for many new mothers {{!}} The Independent |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180207220039/http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/husband-stitch-episiotomy-misogyny-motherhood-pregnancy-surgery-stitch-sexism-childbirth-a8184346.html |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=web.archive.org}}</ref> by Kaitlin Reilly for Yahoo Life,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Is 'the husband stitch' a medical myth? Women speak out about their experience. |url=https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/what-is-the-husband-stitch-episiotomies-130009654.html |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=Yahoo Life |language=en-US}}</ref> by Anam Alam to Thred,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-01-17 |title=Understanding the pain behind the ‘husband stitch’ |url=https://thred.com/change/people/understanding-the-pain-behind-the-husband-stitch/ |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=Thred Website |language=en-GB}}</ref> in reports from French Newspapers Grazia,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mezaguer |first=Louhann |last2=auteurs-louhann_mezaguer |date=2021-11-26 |title=Point du mari : tout savoir sur cette mutilation gynécologique faite à l'insu des femmes en post-partum pour favoriser le plaisir de l'homme |url=https://www.grazia.fr/news-et-societe/societe/point-du-mari-tout-savoir-sur-cette-mutilation-gynecologique-faite-a-linsu-des-femmes-en-post-partum-pour-favoriser-le-plaisir-de-lhomme-53538.html |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=Grazia |language=fr-FR}}</ref> and Le Monde.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2014-04-18 |title=Derrière le « point du mari », le traumatisme de l'épisiotomie |language=fr |work=Le Monde.fr |url=https://www.lemonde.fr/sante/article/2014/04/18/derriere-le-point-du-mari-le-traumatisme-de-l-episiotomie_4403470_1651302.html |access-date=2023-03-10}}</ref>

Belgian researchers Julie Dobbeleir, Koenraad Van Landuyt and Stan J. Monstrey have studied the practice, finding evidence of it happening in Belgium at least since the 50s:<blockquote>Vaginal tightening surgery has been around since the mid fifties, where gynecologists used to tighten the entrance of a woman’s vagina with an extra stitch while repairing vaginal and perineum tears or episiotomies after giving birth. At that time it was notoriously known as the ‘‘husband’s stitch,’’ the ‘‘husband’s knot,’’ or the ‘‘vaginal tuck,’’ and doctors discreetly referred to thisprocedure as ‘‘improving a woman’s well-being.’’<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Dobbeleir |first=Julie M. L. C. L. |last2=Landuyt |first2=Koenraad Van |last3=Monstrey |first3=Stan J. |date=2011-05 |title=Aesthetic Surgery of the Female Genitalia |url=http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0031-1281482 |journal=Seminars in Plastic Surgery |language=en |volume=25 |issue=02 |pages=130–141 |doi=10.1055/s-0031-1281482 |issn=1535-2188 |pmc=PMC3312147 |pmid=22547970}}</ref></blockquote>The Husband Stitch has also been referenced in a 2004 study about the abuse of episiotomies in Sao Paulo:<blockquote>Professionals we have interviewed often mention the ponto do marido (husband’s stitch), intended to make the vaginal opening even tighter after delivery. Frequent complications

are vulval and vaginal pain, scarring problems and deformities that need further surgical correction. Long-term consequences for sexual relations of episiotomy need further study.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Diniz |first=Simone G |last2=Chacham |first2=Alessandra S |date=2004-01-01 |title=“The Cut Above” and “the Cut Below”: The Abuse of Caesareans and Episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23112-3 |journal=Reproductive Health Matters |volume=12 |issue=23 |pages=100–110 |doi=10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23112-3 |issn=0968-8080 |pmid=15242215}}</ref></blockquote>Simimlarly in Cambodia, the practice has been linked to high rates of episiotomy: "A study in the NIH database found that the continued use of episiotomies in Cambodia was due to many doctors’ belief that they would provide women with a “tighter and prettier vagina” if they gave her an episiotomy."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schantz |first=Clémence |last2=Sim |first2=Kruy Leang |last3=Ly |first3=Ek Meng |last4=Barennes |first4=Hubert |last5=Sudaroth |first5=So |last6=Goyet |first6=Sophie |date=2015-05 |title=Reasons for routine episiotomy: A mixed-methods study in a large maternity hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26278834/ |journal=Reproductive Health Matters |volume=23 |issue=45 |pages=68–77 |doi=10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.012 |issn=1460-9576 |pmid=26278834}}</ref>

OBGYN Jesanna Cooper, MD has also pointed out the risks to vaginal health connected with the procedure, and the lack of benefits:“A ‘husband stitch’ would not affect overall vaginal tone, as this has much more to do with pelvic floor strength and integrity than with introitus [opening] size”.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-01-24 |title=The Husband Stitch Isn’t Just a Horrifying Childbirth Myth |url=https://www.healthline.com/health-news/husband-stitch-is-not-just-myth |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=Healthline |language=en}}</ref> A report on Fatherly also warned men not to see it as a joke: "Best case scenario, the person delivering your kid is going to think you don’t know how sex works. Worst case scenario, it backfires with a pointless stitch that could cause your partner more pain. Even if it’s coming from a good place, the best way to reduce the risk of someone not getting a joke is to stop telling it."<ref name="Vinopal" />


==Popular culture==
==Popular culture==
Line 20: Line 28:
== References ==
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

== Bibliography ==
Braun, Virginia, and Celia Kitzinger. “The Perfectible Vagina: Size Matters.” Culture, Health <nowiki>&</nowiki>amp; Sexuality, vol. 3, no. 3, 2001, pp. 263–277., <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050152484704</nowiki>.

{{cite journal|last1=Braun|first1=V.|last2=Wilkinson|first2=S.|title=Socio-cultural representations of the vagina|journal=Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology|date=4 August 2010|volume=19|issue=1|pages=17–32|doi=10.1080/02646830020032374|s2cid=145198475}}

Dobbeleir, Julie M.L.C.L., et al. “Aesthetic Surgery of the Female Genitalia.” ''Seminars in Plastic Surgery'', vol. 25, no. 02, 2011, pp. 130–141., <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281482</nowiki>.

{{cite journal|last1=Green|first1=Fiona J.|title=From clitoridectomies to 'designer vaginas': The medical construction of heteronormative female bodies and sexuality through female genital cutting|journal=Sexualities, Evolution & Gender|date=August 2005|volume=7|issue=2|page=170|doi=10.1080/14616660500200223|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232846373}}

Mayra, K., Sandall, J., Matthews, Z. et al. Breaking the silence about obstetric violence: Body mapping women’s narratives of respect, disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Bihar, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 318 (2022). <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04503-7</nowiki>

Simone G Diniz, Alessandra S Chacham, “''The Cut Above” and “the Cut Below”: The Abuse of Caesareans and Episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil'', Reproductive Health Matters, Volume 12, Issue 23, 2004, Pages 100-110, ISSN 0968-8080, <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23112-3</nowiki>.

Zaami S, Stark M, Beck R, Malvasi A, Marinelli E. Does episiotomy always equate violence in obstetrics? Routine and selective episiotomy in obstetric practice and legal questions. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Mar;23(5):1847-1854. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201903_17219. PMID: 30915726.


==External links==
==External links==
{{wiktionary}}
{{wiktionary}}
*
*{{cite journal|last1=Braun|first1=V.|last2=Wilkinson|first2=S.|title=Socio-cultural representations of the vagina|journal=Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology|date=4 August 2010|volume=19|issue=1|pages=17–32|doi=10.1080/02646830020032374|s2cid=145198475}}
*
*{{cite journal|last1=Green|first1=Fiona J.|title=From clitoridectomies to 'designer vaginas': The medical construction of heteronormative female bodies and sexuality through female genital cutting|journal=Sexualities, Evolution & Gender|date=August 2005|volume=7|issue=2|page=170|doi=10.1080/14616660500200223|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232846373}}


{{Women's health}}
{{Women's health}}

Revision as of 14:14, 10 March 2023

The husband stitch or husband's stitch,[1] also known as the daddy stitch,[2] husband's knot and vaginal tuck,[3] is a surgical procedure in which one or more additional sutures than necessary are used to repair a woman's perineum after it has been torn or cut during childbirth.[a] The claimed purpose is to tighten the opening of the vagina and thereby enhance the pleasure of her male sex partner during penetrative intercourse.[4] The Husband stitch was for long considered an urban legen, but since then, numerous reports have interviewed witnesses, both patients and doctors.

Medical perspective

While repair of the perineum may be medically necessary, an extra stitch is not, and may cause discomfort or pain.[2][5] Use of the term in the medical literature can be traced to Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association in 1885, where a doctor claimed to have performed one.[b]

"Dr. Geo. Cupples was called upon to explain the 'Husband Stitch,' which he did as follows: He said that when he was stitching up a ruptured perineum, of a married lady, the husband was an anxious and interested observer, and when he had taken all the stitches necessary, the husband peeped over his shoulders and said, 'Dr., can't you take another stitch?' and he did, and called it the 'Husband Stitch'."[7]

The term is also referenced in What Women Want to Know (1958),[c] and in The Year After Childbirth: Surviving and Enjoying the First Year of Motherhood, written by Sheila Kitzinger in 1994.[9]

Few studies exist to determine whether the procedure occurs often and how many women have been affected beyond anecdotal evidence.[10] Some medical practitioners have asserted that the procedure is mostly an urban legend, and false attribution,[2] while others have claimed to know doctors who perform the procedure.[11] The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, acording to a report by Fatherly, does not deny that the procedure happens, while alleging that it “is not standard or common.”[2] Other doctors, such as Jean Marty, head of the Union of Gynecologysts in France, have claimed that the idea of a Husband Stitch comes from botched episiotomies and poor stitching, that lead women to have pain during sexual intercourse and while urinating.[12] Episiotomies have become a routine procedure around the world,[13] in spite of studies that claimed it offers no benefits to pregnant people.[14]

However, there are several accounts of women who claim to have undergone this procedure without their consent.[10][15] There have been several journalistic investigations on the existence of the Husband Stitch, trying to determine if it was real. They have overwhelmingly determined that the practice does exist, as seen in reports by Chelsea Ritschel, writing for Healthline,[16] by Kaitlin Reilly for Yahoo Life,[17] by Anam Alam to Thred,[18] in reports from French Newspapers Grazia,[19] and Le Monde.[20]

Belgian researchers Julie Dobbeleir, Koenraad Van Landuyt and Stan J. Monstrey have studied the practice, finding evidence of it happening in Belgium at least since the 50s:

Vaginal tightening surgery has been around since the mid fifties, where gynecologists used to tighten the entrance of a woman’s vagina with an extra stitch while repairing vaginal and perineum tears or episiotomies after giving birth. At that time it was notoriously known as the ‘‘husband’s stitch,’’ the ‘‘husband’s knot,’’ or the ‘‘vaginal tuck,’’ and doctors discreetly referred to thisprocedure as ‘‘improving a woman’s well-being.’’[21]

The Husband Stitch has also been referenced in a 2004 study about the abuse of episiotomies in Sao Paulo:

Professionals we have interviewed often mention the ponto do marido (husband’s stitch), intended to make the vaginal opening even tighter after delivery. Frequent complications are vulval and vaginal pain, scarring problems and deformities that need further surgical correction. Long-term consequences for sexual relations of episiotomy need further study.[22]

Simimlarly in Cambodia, the practice has been linked to high rates of episiotomy: "A study in the NIH database found that the continued use of episiotomies in Cambodia was due to many doctors’ belief that they would provide women with a “tighter and prettier vagina” if they gave her an episiotomy."[23]

OBGYN Jesanna Cooper, MD has also pointed out the risks to vaginal health connected with the procedure, and the lack of benefits:“A ‘husband stitch’ would not affect overall vaginal tone, as this has much more to do with pelvic floor strength and integrity than with introitus [opening] size”.[24] A report on Fatherly also warned men not to see it as a joke: "Best case scenario, the person delivering your kid is going to think you don’t know how sex works. Worst case scenario, it backfires with a pointless stitch that could cause your partner more pain. Even if it’s coming from a good place, the best way to reduce the risk of someone not getting a joke is to stop telling it."[2]

Popular culture

A short story by Carmen Maria Machado, "The Husband Stitch", first published in 2014 by Granta and later published in the collection Her Body and Other Parties, describes a woman undergoing the procedure.[25]

In Doom Patrol's season 2 2020 premiere Cliff's father tells him, "When that baby doctor asks if you want the husband stitch, you tell him, "I'll take two."[26]

In Colin From Accounts' 2022 season 1 episode 4 a patient's male companion asks the protagonist student doctor to "throw another stitch in there, make it like new" and later on a different patient's male companion asks her to "chuck a husband stitch in there".[27]

Notes

  1. ^ "Vaginal tightening surgery has been around since the mid fifties, where gynecologists used to tighten the entrance of a woman's vagina with an extra stitch while repairing vaginal and perineum tears or episiotomies after giving birth. At that time it was notoriously known as the 'husband's stitch', the 'husband's knot', or the 'vaginal tuck', and doctors discreetly referred to this procedure as 'improving a woman's well-being'."[3]
  2. ^ "Dr. Geo. Cupples was called upon to explain the 'Husband Stitch,' which he did as follows: He said that when he was stitching up a ruptured perineum, of a married lady, the husband was an anxious and interested observer, and when he had taken all the stitches necessary, the husband peeped over his shoulders and said, 'Dr., can't you take another stitch?' and he did, and called it the 'Husband Stitch'."[6]
  3. ^ "Such a problem confronted a colleague of mine, whose pregnant patient asked him before delivery if he would please put in what she referred to as 'her husband's stitch'. It turned out that she wanted him to tighten up her vagina somewhat, so that it would revert to its original state. The doctor took her at her word and, following delivery of her fourth baby, performed a perineorrhaphy. This operation has the effect of tightening the sphincter and rendering the introitus somewhat smaller.
    "Unhappily, the patient and her husband decided that the 'stitch' had been made too tight, was unsatisfactory, and sued the doctor for malpractice, asking something in the neighborhood of a hundred thousand dollars. The doctor won his case, though not without difficulty, and it was a genuine legal battle despite the humorous implications of the issue."[8]

References

  1. ^ Kitzinger, Sheila (1994). The Year After Childbirth (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-0192177841.
  2. ^ a b c d e Vinopal, Lauren (17 August 2017). "Who's Afraid of the 'Husband Stitch'? New Moms Everywhere". Fatherly. Archived from the original on 16 October 2017. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  3. ^ a b Dobbeleir, Julie M. L. C. L.; Van Landuyt, Koenraad; Monstrey, Stan J. (May 2011). "Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia". Seminars in Plastic Surgery. 25 (2): 130–41. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281482. PMC 3312147. PMID 22547970.
  4. ^ Braun, Virginia; Kitzinger, Celia (January 2001). "The perfectible vagina: Size matters". Culture, Health & Sexuality. 3 (3): 263–277. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.552.8931. doi:10.1080/13691050152484704. S2CID 143982758.
  5. ^ Ritschel, Chelsea (29 January 2018). "The 'Husband Stitch' During Episiotomy Repair is a Disturbing Reality for Many New Mothers". The Independent. Archived from the original on 7 February 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2018.
  6. ^ Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association. Vol. Seventeenth Annual Session. Houston, Texas: Texas State Medical Association. 21–23 April 1885.
  7. ^ Transactions of the Texas State Medical Association. The Association. 1885.
  8. ^ Imerman, Harold M.; Dewey, Thomas Blanchard (1958). What Women Want to Know: A Noted Gynecologist's Guide to the Personal Problems of Women's Health. New York: Crown. p. 134.
  9. ^ Kitzinger, Sheila (1994). The Year After Childbirth: Surviving and Enjoying the First Year of Motherhood. HarperCollins Canada. ISBN 9780002550727.
  10. ^ a b Murphy, Carrie (24 January 2018). "The Husband Stitch Isn't Just a Horrifying Childbirth Myth". Healthline. Archived from the original on 2 February 2018. Retrieved 2 February 2018.
  11. ^ "Le point du mari, un vrai scandale ? - Elle". elle.fr (in French). 2014-06-24. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  12. ^ "Derrière le « point du mari », le traumatisme de l'épisiotomie". Le Monde.fr (in French). 2014-04-18. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  13. ^ Hartmann, Katherine; Viswanathan, Meera; Palmieri, Rachel; Gartlehner, Gerald; Thorp, John; Lohr, Kathleen N. (2005-05-04). "Outcomes of Routine EpisiotomyA Systematic Review". JAMA. 293 (17): 2141–2148. doi:10.1001/jama.293.17.2141. ISSN 0098-7484.
  14. ^ "Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth". www.cochrane.org. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  15. ^ Halton, Mary (26 April 2018). "The 'Husband Stitch' Leaves Women in Pain and Without Answers". Vice.
  16. ^ "The 'Husband Stitch' during episiotomy repair is a disturbing reality for many new mothers | The Independent". web.archive.org. 2018-02-07. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  17. ^ "Is 'the husband stitch' a medical myth? Women speak out about their experience". Yahoo Life. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  18. ^ "Understanding the pain behind the 'husband stitch'". Thred Website. 2023-01-17. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  19. ^ Mezaguer, Louhann; auteurs-louhann_mezaguer (2021-11-26). "Point du mari : tout savoir sur cette mutilation gynécologique faite à l'insu des femmes en post-partum pour favoriser le plaisir de l'homme". Grazia (in French). Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  20. ^ "Derrière le « point du mari », le traumatisme de l'épisiotomie". Le Monde.fr (in French). 2014-04-18. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  21. ^ Dobbeleir, Julie M. L. C. L.; Landuyt, Koenraad Van; Monstrey, Stan J. (2011-05). "Aesthetic Surgery of the Female Genitalia". Seminars in Plastic Surgery. 25 (02): 130–141. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281482. ISSN 1535-2188. PMC 3312147. PMID 22547970. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  22. ^ Diniz, Simone G; Chacham, Alessandra S (2004-01-01). ""The Cut Above" and "the Cut Below": The Abuse of Caesareans and Episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil". Reproductive Health Matters. 12 (23): 100–110. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23112-3. ISSN 0968-8080. PMID 15242215.
  23. ^ Schantz, Clémence; Sim, Kruy Leang; Ly, Ek Meng; Barennes, Hubert; Sudaroth, So; Goyet, Sophie (2015-05). "Reasons for routine episiotomy: A mixed-methods study in a large maternity hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia". Reproductive Health Matters. 23 (45): 68–77. doi:10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.012. ISSN 1460-9576. PMID 26278834. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  24. ^ "The Husband Stitch Isn't Just a Horrifying Childbirth Myth". Healthline. 2018-01-24. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  25. ^ Machado, Carmen Maria (28 October 2014). "The Husband Stitch". Granta. Archived from the original on 28 January 2018. Retrieved 2 February 2018.
  26. ^ "Make it Tighter: The Husband's Stitch". livewire.thewire.in. 2022-04-13. Retrieved 2023-01-30.
  27. ^ "Colin From Accounts Season 1 Episode 4 Recap". reelmockery.com. 2022-04-13. Retrieved 2022-12-15.

Bibliography

Braun, Virginia, and Celia Kitzinger. “The Perfectible Vagina: Size Matters.” Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 3, no. 3, 2001, pp. 263–277., https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050152484704.

Braun, V.; Wilkinson, S. (4 August 2010). "Socio-cultural representations of the vagina". Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 19 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1080/02646830020032374. S2CID 145198475.

Dobbeleir, Julie M.L.C.L., et al. “Aesthetic Surgery of the Female Genitalia.” Seminars in Plastic Surgery, vol. 25, no. 02, 2011, pp. 130–141., https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281482.

Green, Fiona J. (August 2005). "From clitoridectomies to 'designer vaginas': The medical construction of heteronormative female bodies and sexuality through female genital cutting". Sexualities, Evolution & Gender. 7 (2): 170. doi:10.1080/14616660500200223.

Mayra, K., Sandall, J., Matthews, Z. et al. Breaking the silence about obstetric violence: Body mapping women’s narratives of respect, disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Bihar, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 318 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04503-7

Simone G Diniz, Alessandra S Chacham, “The Cut Above” and “the Cut Below”: The Abuse of Caesareans and Episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil, Reproductive Health Matters, Volume 12, Issue 23, 2004, Pages 100-110, ISSN 0968-8080, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23112-3.

Zaami S, Stark M, Beck R, Malvasi A, Marinelli E. Does episiotomy always equate violence in obstetrics? Routine and selective episiotomy in obstetric practice and legal questions. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Mar;23(5):1847-1854. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201903_17219. PMID: 30915726.

External links