Sauropodomorpha: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RibotBOT (talk | contribs)
m r2.6.5) (robot Modifying: sk:Sauropodomorphy
m Journal cites (title/URL format):, templated 2 journal cites (Diberri fmt authors), using AWB (7736)
Line 46: Line 46:
Recent [[phylogenetic]] analyses by Adam Yates (2004, 2006) and others firmly places Sauropoda within a [[paraphyletic]] "Prosauropoda". Also, finds of late Triassic sauropods demonstrate that there is no gap between the "prosauropod" and sauropod lineages.
Recent [[phylogenetic]] analyses by Adam Yates (2004, 2006) and others firmly places Sauropoda within a [[paraphyletic]] "Prosauropoda". Also, finds of late Triassic sauropods demonstrate that there is no gap between the "prosauropod" and sauropod lineages.


Evidence against sauropod ancestry within Prosauropoda comes from the fact that prosauropods had a smaller outer [[toe]] on their hind feet than the sauropods. Many maintain that it is easier for [[Digit (anatomy)|digit]]s to be reduced or lost during [[evolution]] than the reverse, however there is no evidence for this. The lengthening, or gaining of extra digits is common in marine reptiles, and within the theropods digit lengthening occurred at least once. Therefore using this as evidence against ancestral prosauropods is questionable.{{fact|date=January 2011}}
Evidence against sauropod ancestry within Prosauropoda comes from the fact that prosauropods had a smaller outer [[toe]] on their hind feet than the sauropods. Many maintain that it is easier for [[Digit (anatomy)|digit]]s to be reduced or lost during [[evolution]] than the reverse, however there is no evidence for this. The lengthening, or gaining of extra digits is common in marine reptiles, and within the theropods digit lengthening occurred at least once. Therefore using this as evidence against ancestral prosauropods is questionable.{{citation needed|date=January 2011}}


Most modern classification schemes break the prosauropods into a half-dozen groups that evolved separately from one common lineage. While they have a number of shared characteristics, the [[evolution]]ary requirements for [[giraffe]]-like browsing high in the trees may have caused [[convergent evolution]], where similar traits evolve separately because they faced the same evolutionary pressure, instead of ([[homology (biology)|homologous]]) traits derived from a shared ancestor.<ref name=poletal2011>Pol, D., Garrido, A. and Cerda, I.A. (2011). "[http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0014572 A New Sauropodomorph Dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of Patagonia and the Origin and Evolution of the Sauropod-type Sacrum]." ''PLoS ONE'', '''6'''(1): e14572. {{doi|10.1371/journal.pone.0014572}}</ref>
Most modern classification schemes break the prosauropods into a half-dozen groups that evolved separately from one common lineage. While they have a number of shared characteristics, the [[evolution]]ary requirements for [[giraffe]]-like browsing high in the trees may have caused [[convergent evolution]], where similar traits evolve separately because they faced the same evolutionary pressure, instead of ([[homology (biology)|homologous]]) traits derived from a shared ancestor.<ref name=poletal2011>{{cite journal | author = Pol D., Garrido A., Cerda I.A. | year = 2011 | title = A New Sauropodomorph Dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of Patagonia and the Origin and Evolution of the Sauropod-type Sacrum | url = http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0014572 | journal = PLoS ONE | volume = 6 | issue = 1| page = e14572 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0014572 }}</ref>


===Taxonomy===
===Taxonomy===
* '''Suborder Sauropodomorpha'''
* '''Suborder Sauropodomorpha'''
** ''[[Eoraptor]]''?<ref name="Martinez2011"/>
** ''[[Eoraptor]]''?<ref name="Martinez2011"/>
** Family [[Guaibasauridae]]<ref name="Ezcurra2010">{{cite journal|author=Ezcurra, M. D.|year=2010 |title=[http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a924950072~frm=titlelink A new early dinosaur (Saurischia: Sauropodomorpha) from the Late Triassic of Argentina: a reassessment of dinosaur origin and phylogeny]|journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology|volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=371–425}}</ref>
** Family [[Guaibasauridae]]<ref name="Ezcurra2010">{{cite journal|author=Ezcurra, M. D.|year=2010 |title=A new early dinosaur (Saurischia: Sauropodomorpha) from the Late Triassic of Argentina: a reassessment of dinosaur origin and phylogeny|journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology|volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=371–425 |url=http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a924950072~frm=titlelink}}</ref>
** ''[[Thecodontosaurus]]''
** ''[[Thecodontosaurus]]''
** '''Infraorder [[Prosauropoda]]'''
** '''Infraorder [[Prosauropoda]]'''
Line 116: Line 116:
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}
* [[Jeffrey A. Wilson|Wilson, J. A.]] 2002. Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis, ''[[Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society]]'' 136:217-276.
* {{cite journal | author = Wilson J. A. | authorlink = Jeffrey A. Wilson | year = 2002 | title = Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis | url = | journal = [[Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society]] | volume = 136 | issue = | pages = 217–276 }}


==External links==
==External links==

Revision as of 13:44, 28 May 2011

Sauropodomorphs
Temporal range:
Late TriassicLate Cretaceous, 230–65 Ma
Mounted skeleton of Apatosaurus louisae, Carnegie Museum
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Eusaurischia
Clade: Sauropodomorpha
von Huene, 1932
Subgroups

and see text

The Sauropodomorpha (Template:Pron-en saw-ROP-ə-də-MOR-fə) were a group of long-necked, herbivorous dinosaurs that eventually dropped down on all fours and became the largest animals that ever walked the earth.

Description

Skull of Nigersaurus taqueti and head posture in sauropodomorphs

Sauropodomorphs were adapted to browsing higher than any other contemporary herbivore, giving them access to high tree foliage. This feeding strategy is supported by many of their defining characteristics, such as: a light, tiny skull on the end of a long neck (with ten or more elongated cervical vertebrae) and a counterbalancing long tail (with one to three extra sacral vertebrae).

Their teeth were weak, and shaped like leaves or spoons (lanceolate or spatulate). Instead of grinding teeth, they had stomach stones (gastroliths), similar to the gizzard stones of modern birds and crocodiles, to help digest tough plant fibers. The front of the upper mouth bends down in what may be a beak.

The earliest known sauropodomorph, Saturnalia, was small and slender (1.5 metres, or 5 feet long), but by the end of the Triassic they were the largest dinosaurs of their time, and in the Jurassic/Cretaceous they kept on growing. Ultimately the largest sauropods like the Supersaurus, Diplodocus hallorum, and Argentinosaurus reached 30–40 metres (100–130 ft) in length, and 60,000–100,000 kilograms (65–110 US short tons) or more in mass.

Initially bipedal, as their size increased they evolved to become graviportal quadrupeds (like elephants). The early sauropodomorphs were most likely omnivores as their shared common ancestor with the other saurischian lineage (the theropods) was a carnivore. Therefore their evolution to herbivory went hand in hand with their increasing size and neck length.

They also had large nostrils (nares), and retained a thumb (pollex) with a big claw which may have been used for defense — though their primary defensive adaptation was their extreme size.

Comparisons between the scleral rings of several sauropodmorph genera (Diplodocus, Lufengosaurus, Nemegtosaurus, Plateosaurus, and Riojasaurus) and modern birds and reptiles suggest that they may have been cathemeral, active throughout the day at short intervals.[1]

Time range

Among the very first dinosaurs to evolve in the late Triassic Period, about 230 million years ago (Mya), they became the dominant herbivores by half way through the late Triassic (during the Norian stage). Their perceived decline in the early Cretaceous is most likely a bias in fossil sampling, as most fossils are known from Europe and North America. Sauropods were still the dominant herbivores in the Gondwana landmasses, however. The spread of flowering plants (angiosperms) and "advanced" ornithischians, another major group of herbivorous dinosaurs (noted for their highly developed chewing mechanisms) are most likely not a major factor in sauropod decline in the northern continents. Like all non-avian dinosaurs, the sauropodomorphs became extinct 65 Mya, during the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event.

The earliest and most basal sauropodomorphs known are Chromogisaurus novasi and Panphagia protos, both from the Ischigualasto Formation, dated to 231.4 million years ago (late Ladinian age of the Middle Triassic according to the ICS;[2] alternately called the early Carnian age of the Late Triassic in the system used by the Geological Society of America).[3][4] Some studies have found Eoraptor lunensis (also from the Ischigualasto Formation), traditionally considered a theropod, to be an early member of the sauropodomorph lineage, which would make it the most basal sauropodomorph known.[5] Additional fragmentary remains from Madagascar may represent an even earlier sauropodomorph from the middle Triassic.[6]

Classification

Sauropodomorpha is one of the two major clades within the order Saurischia. The sauropodomorphs' sister group, the Theropoda, includes bipedal carnivores like Velociraptor and Tyrannosaurus; as well as birds. However, sauropodomorphs also share a number of characteristics with the Ornithischia, so a small minority of palaeontologists like Bakker have historically placed both sets of herbivores within a group called "Phytodinosauria" or "Ornithischiformes."

In Linnaean taxonomy, Sauropodomorpha (which means "lizard feet forms") is either a suborder or is left unranked. It was originally established by Friedrich von Huene in 1932, who broke it into two groups: the basal forms within Prosauropoda, and their descendants, the giant Sauropoda.

Recent phylogenetic analyses by Adam Yates (2004, 2006) and others firmly places Sauropoda within a paraphyletic "Prosauropoda". Also, finds of late Triassic sauropods demonstrate that there is no gap between the "prosauropod" and sauropod lineages.

Evidence against sauropod ancestry within Prosauropoda comes from the fact that prosauropods had a smaller outer toe on their hind feet than the sauropods. Many maintain that it is easier for digits to be reduced or lost during evolution than the reverse, however there is no evidence for this. The lengthening, or gaining of extra digits is common in marine reptiles, and within the theropods digit lengthening occurred at least once. Therefore using this as evidence against ancestral prosauropods is questionable.[citation needed]

Most modern classification schemes break the prosauropods into a half-dozen groups that evolved separately from one common lineage. While they have a number of shared characteristics, the evolutionary requirements for giraffe-like browsing high in the trees may have caused convergent evolution, where similar traits evolve separately because they faced the same evolutionary pressure, instead of (homologous) traits derived from a shared ancestor.[7]

Taxonomy

Phylogeny

The following cladogram simplified after an analysis presented by Diego Pol and colleagues in 2011.[7]

Sauropodomorpha

References

  1. ^ Schmitz, L.; Motani, R. (2011). "Nocturnality in Dinosaurs Inferred from Scleral Ring and Orbit Morphology". Science. in press. doi:10.1126/science.1200043.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G. and Smith, A.G. (2004). A Geologic Time Scale 2004, Cambridge University Press.
  3. ^ Luciano A. Leal, Sergio A. K. Azevodo, Alexander W. A. Kellner, and Átila A. S. da Rosa (October 18, 2004). "A new early dinosaur (Sauropodomorpha) from the Caturrita Formation (Late Triassic), Paraná Basin, Brazil" (PDF). Zootaxa. 690: 1–24.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) (Warning: abstract is 12 kb PDF)
  4. ^ Martínez, Ricardo N. (2009). "A basal sauropodomorph (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Ischigualasto Formation (Triassic, Carnian) and the early evolution of Sauropodomorpha" (pdf). PLoS ONE. 4 (2): 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004397. PMC 2635939. PMID 19209223. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  5. ^ a b Ricardo N. Martinez, Paul C. Sereno, Oscar A. Alcober, Carina E. Colombi, Paul R. Renne, Isabel P. Montañez and Brian S. Currie (2011). "A Basal Dinosaur from the Dawn of the Dinosaur Era in Southwestern Pangaea". Science. 331 (6014): 206–210. doi:10.1126/science.1198467.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ "All Things Considered". National Public Radio. October 21, 1999.
  7. ^ a b Pol D., Garrido A., Cerda I.A. (2011). "A New Sauropodomorph Dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of Patagonia and the Origin and Evolution of the Sauropod-type Sacrum". PLoS ONE. 6 (1): e14572. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014572.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  8. ^ Ezcurra, M. D. (2010). "A new early dinosaur (Saurischia: Sauropodomorpha) from the Late Triassic of Argentina: a reassessment of dinosaur origin and phylogeny". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 8 (3): 371–425.

External links