Gamergate (ant): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 624404454 by Bilby (talk) and behold!, it's back
Thibbs (talk | contribs)
expanding
Line 1: Line 1:
{{about|a type of ant|the 2014 video game culture controversy|GamerGate}}
{{about|a type of ant|the 2014 video game culture controversy|GamerGate}}


[[File:Pachycondyla berthoudi sam-hym-c007394a profile 1.jpg|thumb|Lateral view of a female ''Pachycondyla berthoudi'' worker – the ant for which the term "gamegate" was originally coined.]]
A '''gamergate''' is a [[worker ant]] which is able to reproduce with mature males without a [[queen ant|queen]] present in its [[ant colony|colony]]. In some queenless societies it was shown that some nests can have one or even several gamergates per colony.<ref name=1991book>{{cite book|last1=Veeresh|first1=G.K.|last2=Mallik|first2=B.|title=Social Insects and the Environment: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Iussi, 1990 (International Union for the Study of Social Insec)|date=1991|publisher=Brill Academic Pub|isbn=978-9004093164|page=234|url=http://books.google.com.au/books?id=ZsMUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA234&lpg=PA234&dq=ants+with+gamergates&source=bl&ots=PLHOHfz4Lr&sig=ZRiSYkKqE0u84k063FolU4J11Hg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=rG3pU-zlGYi8oQTYnoL4DQ&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=ants%20with%20gamergates&f=false|accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref> In ''[[Pachycondyla berthoudi]]'' (junior synonym of ''[[Pachycondyla strigulosa]]''), winged queens do not exist, but instead foreign males visit underground nests to mate with workers.<ref name="AWpach">{{cite web |url=http://www.antweb.org/description.do?genus=pachycondyla&species=berthoudi&rank=species&project=allantwebants |title= Species: ''Pachycondyla berthoudi'' |date= |website=antweb.org |publisher=[[AntWeb]] |accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
A '''gamergate''' is a reproductively viable female [[worker ant]] that is able to reproduce with mature males when the [[ant colony|colony]] is lacking a [[queen ant|queen]]. Most commonly occurring within the primitive species of the [[Poneromorph subfamilies]], gamergate females differentiate from their fellow workers by a combination of elevated fecundity and aggression-related mutilation of competitors' secondary sexual characteristics. Subsequent to their first mating event, however, aggression is no longer needed as females secrete chemical signals that lead the workers to accept their role as reproducers for the colony.


Gamergates exist in colonies with winged and ergatoid queens as well as singly in monogynous colonies and alongside other reproductively viable gamergates in polygynous colonies. Most gamergate species are solitary generalist foragers living in arid environments.
When a queen dies in a ''[[Harpegnathos saltator]]'' colony, workers of the colony will begin to fight for dominance to become the next queen and reproduce the next eggs.<ref name=NYTimes>{{cite news|last1=Gorman|first1=James|title=The Ant Queen Is Dead. Let the Battles Begin.|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/27/science/the-ant-queen-is-dead-let-the-battles-begin.html|accessdate=12 August 2014|publisher=[[New York Times]]|date=27 May 2014}}</ref> A colony of ''[[Myrmecia pyriformis]]'' in 1998 was collected and lasted three years reproducing without a queen ant.<ref name=Dietemann2004>{{cite journal|last1=Dietemann|first1= V. |last2=Peeters|first2=C|last3=Hölldobler|first3= B.|date=2004|title=Gamergates in the Australian ant subfamily Myrmeciinae" |journal=Naturwissenschaften|volume=91|issue=9|pages=432-435}}</ref>

==Etymology==
The term "gamergate" derives from the Greek word {{lang|grc|γάμος}} (''gámos'') and means "married worker." It was coined in 1983 by geneticist [[William L. Brown]]<ref name=peeters84/> and was first used in scientific literature by entomologists Christian Peeters and Robin Crewe in a 1984 paper published in ''[[Naturwissenschaften]]''.<ref name=veron/> The definition typically found in entomological dictionaries is "mated, egg-laying worker,"<ref name=barrows/><ref name=gordh/> and is drawn from the glossary of [[Bert Hölldobler]] and [[E. O. Wilson]]'s 1990 book, ''[[The Ants]]''.<ref name=barrows/>

==Overview==
There exist between one hundred and two hundred different species of queenless ants (roughly 1% of all ants), most of which fall within the [[Poneromorph subfamilies]]. Whereas female workers in colonies with a queen are [[morphology (biology)|morphologically]] incapable of mating, in gamergate societies a single reproductive worker and sometimes a cadre of dominant female workers have active ovaries.<ref name=noel/> Gamergate lifespan is short compared to queens in queenright colonies, but gamergates can be replaced by other dominant workers in the colony without risking colony survival. Reproductive investment in gamergate females is thus optimized because non-differentiated gamergates (i.e. reproductively inactive workers) function as laborers.<ref name=choe/>

===Caste structure===
[[File:Diacamma australe casent0172073 dorsal 1.jpg|thumb|Dorsal view of a nonreproductive female ''Diacamma australe'' worker. Note the lack of anterior thoracic gemmae.]]
Within gamergate colonies all females are born reproductively viable and thus represent potential gamergates. Prior to differentiation as a gamergate a dominant female workers must physically inhibit its sisters. For example in the case of ''Diacamma australe'', the first females to reach maturity will clip off the thoracic gemmae of their sisters. This mutilation greatly reduces the attractiveness of the female as a mate. Thereafter persistent domination of worker females by gamergates via physical aggression all but ensure that they will not produce male offspring.<ref name=bourke/> In ''Diacamma nilgiri'' gamergates use dominance interactions to monopolize reproduction without mutilation of sister workers.<ref name=karnik/> The same is true for ''Streblognathus peetersi'' which engage in non-injurious aggression "games" to determine dominance.<ref name=veron/> For all gamergate species, the act of mating eliminates the need to physically dominate female workers. Instead newly produced pheromones or signaling chemicals ensure that workers remain nonreproductive. Although it is unknown to what degree these chemicals act as pheromones or as signals, support for the signaling hypothesis can be found in the loss of gamergate reproductive inhibition of workers as the gamergate grows older and her fecundity diminishes.<ref name=bourke/>

When a reproductive gamergate dies, it is replaced by a former dominant worker who becomes a new gamergate. New gamergates often emerge from the female cohort closes to maturity at the time of death of the previous gamergate, but in some cases this event triggers adult female workers to differentiate directly to gamergates. For example, when a queen dies in a ''[[Harpegnathos saltator]]'' colony, workers of the colony will begin to fight for dominance to become the next queen and reproduce the next eggs.<ref name=gorman/> Because reproductively inactive workers are able to become reproductive again after the death of the gamergate, some gamergate species can be considered [[cooperative breeders]] rather than truly [[eusocial insect]]s.<ref name=martins/>

In colonies with queens, gamergates, and workers, gamergates occupy an intermediate caste.<ref name=noel/> Research on [[Amblyoponini]] species displaying gamergate social structures has found that there is a fecundity-based hierarchy within the gamergate caste as well. In a study on ''[[Amblyopone]]'' sp., it was found that higher-ranked gamergates had more fully developed [[oocyte]]s than low-ranked gamergates. The near absence of sterile gamergates suggests to researchers that particularly low-ranked gamergates may be expelled from their colonies.<ref name=ito/> A three-tiered gamergate hierarchy also occurs within ''Streblognathus peetersi'' with only alpha-gamergates reproducing while beta- and gamma-gamergates await a chance to reproduce when an alpha-gamergate has lost her fecundity or died.<ref name=veron/> Challenges to top-ranked gamergates from workers of the lower-hierarchies are risky for the challenger because gamergates of species like ''[[Dinoponera quadriceps]]'' may mark the challenger by stinging her with special chemicals only produced by the dominant gamergate. These chemicals signal other workers to immobilize the challenger by biting her appendages and holding her for up to a few days until the threat has passed.<ref name=monnin/>

The role that the dominated worker plays in selection of reproductive females is seen in the expulsion of infertile gamergates in ''Amblyopone'' colonies,<ref name=ito/> and it is even more apparent in ''Dinoponera quadriceps'' where workers may choose to ignore the chemical marker stung by the dominant gamergate. If the dominant gamergate is less reproductively fit than the challenger, workers may instead bite the appendages of the gamergate and hold her immobilized allowing a more fecund challenger to establish herself as the new alpha-gamergate. By playing a part in the selection of gamergates, dominated workers are able to increase their indirect reproduction.<ref name=noel/>

===Social structure variation and ecology===
There is variation within the social structure of ant colonies with a gamergate caste. Some species such as ''Harpegnathos saltator'',<ref name=peeters95/> ''[[Pachycondyla]]'' spp., ''Gnamptogynes menadensis'', and ''Rhytidoponera confusa'' have a winged alate queen caste, a gamergate caste, and a non-reproductive worker caste.<ref name=peeters01/> Some species that normally have a queen caste have been shown to persist for long periods of time by relying on the gamergate caste. For example, a colony of ''[[Myrmecia pyriformis]]'' in 1998 was collected and lasted three years reproducing without a queen ant.<ref name=dietemann/>

Queenless species with only gamergates and workers may have a [[monogyny|monogynous]] structure with a single gamergate female reproducing for the entire colony like a queen or they may have a [[polygyny|polygynous]] structure with multiple reproductive gamergates laying [[diploid]] eggs. Examples of monogynous queenless species include ''Pachycondyla krugeri'', ''P. sublaevis'', ''Diacamma australe'', ''D. rugosum'', ''Platythyrea lamellosa'', and ''Streblognathus aethiopicus'' among others.<ref name=veeresh/> For monogynous gamegates, social regulation is based on morphometry (sexual attractiveness) and fecundity (ovarian oogenesis). Examples of polygynous queenless species include ''Ophthalmopone berthoudi'', ''O. hottentota'', ''Dinoponera quadriceps'', and all known queenless species of ''Rhytidoponera'' spp.<ref name=veeresh/> In the queenless ''[[Pachycondyla berthoudi]]'' (junior synonym of ''[[Pachycondyla strigulosa]]''), foreign males visit underground nests to mate with the polygynous gamergate workers.<ref name=antweb-pachycondyla/>

Yet other systems exist for example in ''Pachycondyla'' spp. where gamergates and [[ergatogyne]]s share a colony with workers.<ref name=tebeau/>

Ecologically, gamergate species from different tribes and genera often tend to share certain characteristics. Most gamergate species are solitary generalist foragers living in arid environments.<ref name=choe/> Like ergatoid systems, the evolution of gamergate social structure is hypothesized to be a response to frequent colonial fission events such as periodic flooding or changes in microclimate such as might occur in harsh arid climates. Myrmecologists Christian Peeters and Fuminori Ito have also suggested that "the evolution of gamergate reproduction appears strongly associated with the adaptive benefits of secondary polygyny (e.g. increased colony lifespan and resource inheritance), and it is the preferred option in species havinf workers able to reproduce sexually."<ref name=peeters01/>

==Classification dispute==
The utility of "gamergate" as a morphological designation is not without critics. Within the field of [[myrmecology]] it is a matter of dispute whether [[caste (biology)|caste]] should be defined primarily by reproductive role or by physical morphology. Notably, Alfred Buschinger has argued that the term "worker" should be applied only to those ants who make up the non-reproductive caste and "queen" should be applied only to reproductively viable female ants regardless of their physical appearance. Hölldobler and Wilson suggest that the two positions can be semantically resolved and that the most fruitful approach would be to keep classification "somewhat loose, incorporating either anatomy or roles in a manner that maximizes convenience, precision, and clarity of expression."<ref name=holldobler/>


==Genera with gamergates==
==Genera with gamergates==
This list may be incomplete and may require expansion:
This list may be incomplete and may require expansion:


*Poneromorph subfamilies
*''[[Diacamma]]''<ref name="AWDiacamma">{{cite web |url=http://www.antweb.org/description.do?name=Diacamma&rank=genus&project=allantwebants |title= Genus: ''Diacamma'' |date= |website=antweb.org |publisher=[[AntWeb]] |accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
**Amblyoponinae
*''[[Harpegnathos]]''<ref>Peeters, C., J. Liebig & B. Hölldobler (2000) Sexual reproduction by both queens and workers in the ponerine ant ''Harpegnathos saltator''. Insectes Sociaux 47: 325-332.</ref>
***''[[Amblyopone]]''<ref name=ito/>
*''[[Leptogenys]]''<ref name=Schmidt2011>{{cite book|last1=Schmidt|first1=Chris A|title=Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic revision of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae).|date=2011|publisher=ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing|isbn=978-1244009004|page=142|url=http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Sby7w0Hec6EC&pg=PA142&lpg=PA142&dq=Leptogenys+gamergates&source=bl&ots=trOkkoM7Qn&sig=-z0oCmVXdhtILR-1md57AK-4Npo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ZHLpU5zOIpHtoASttILQBA&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Leptogenys%20gamergates&f=false|accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
**Ectatomminae
*''[[Myrmecia]]''<ref name=Dietemann2004/>
*''[[Pachycondyla]]''<ref name="AWpach"/>
***''[[Rhytidoponera]]''<ref name=peeters87/>
**Plathyreini
*''[[Platythyrea]]''<ref>Colony structure and reproduction in the thelytokous parthenogenetic ant ''Platythyrea punctata'' (F. Smith) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)</ref>
***''[[Platythyrea]]''<ref name=schilder/>
*''[[Streblognathus]]''<ref name="AWStreblognathus">{{cite web |url=http://www.antweb.org/description.do?subfamily=ponerinae&genus=streblognathus&rank=genus&project=allantwebants|title= Genus: ''Streblognathus'' |date= |website=antweb.org |publisher=[[AntWeb]] |accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
**Ponerinae
***''[[Harpegnathos]]''<ref name=peeters00/>
***''[[Leptogenys]]''<ref name=schmidt/>
***''[[Diacamma]]''<ref name=antweb-diacamma/>
***''[[Dinoponera]]''<ref name=haskins/>
***''[[Ophthalmopone]]''<ref name=peeters85/>/''[[Pachycondyla]]''<ref name=antweb-pachycondyla/>
***''[[Streblognathus]]''<ref name=antweb-streblognathus/>
*Myrmicinae
::*''[[Myrmecia]]''<ref name=dietemann/>
::*''[[Pristomyrmex]]'' - Note: Although the asexual [[Pristomyrmex]] females may technically meet the "gamergate" definition, Hölldobler and Wilson argue that it stretches the definition beyond its useful limits when applied to species practicing [[parthenogenic reproduction]].<ref name=holldobler/>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 20: Line 59:


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2|refs=
{{reflist}}
<ref name=antweb-diacamma>{{cite web |url=http://www.antweb.org/description.do?name=Diacamma&rank=genus&project=allantwebants |title= Genus: ''Diacamma'' |date= |website=antweb.org |publisher=[[AntWeb]] |accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
<ref name=antweb-pachycondyla>{{cite web |url=http://www.antweb.org/description.do?genus=pachycondyla&species=berthoudi&rank=species&project=allantwebants |title= Species: ''Pachycondyla berthoudi'' |date= |website=antweb.org |publisher=[[AntWeb]] |accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
<ref name=antweb-streblognathus>{{cite web |url=http://www.antweb.org/description.do?subfamily=ponerinae&genus=streblognathus&rank=genus&project=allantwebants|title= Genus: ''Streblognathus'' |date= |website=antweb.org |publisher=[[AntWeb]] |accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
<ref name=barrows>Barrows, Edward M. Entry on "Caste - Gamergate" in ''Animal Behavior Desk Reference: A Dictionary of Animal Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution'' (Third Edition). CRC Press. Pg.75. 2011. ISBN 9781439836514</ref>
<ref name=bourke>Bourke, Andrew F. G. Chapter 7 ("Kin Conflict: Reproduction") Part 2 ("Queen Policing, Queen Control, and Queen Signaling") in ''Social Evolution in Ants: Monographs in behavior and ecology''. [[Princeton University Press]]. Pp.239–240. 1995. ISBN 9780691044262</ref>
<ref name=choe>Choe, Jae C. and Bernard J. Crespi. Chapter "Morphologically 'Primitive' Ants" in ''The Evolution of Social Behaviour in Insects and Arachnids''. [[Cambridge University Press]]. Pg.385. 1997. ISBN 9780521589772</ref>
<ref name=dietemann>{{cite journal|last1= Dietemann|first1= V.|last2= Peeters|first2= C|last3= Hölldobler|first3= B.|date= 2004|title= Gamergates in the Australian ant subfamily Myrmeciinae |journal= [[Naturwissenschaften]]|volume= 91|issue= 9|pages= 432–435}}</ref>
<ref name=gordh>Gordh, Gordon. Entry on "Gamergate" in ''A Dictionary of Entomology''. [[CABI (CAB International)|CABI]]. Pg.608. 2011. ISBN 9781845935429</ref>
<ref name=gorman>{{cite news|last1=Gorman|first1=James|title=The Ant Queen Is Dead. Let the Battles Begin.|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/27/science/the-ant-queen-is-dead-let-the-battles-begin.html|accessdate=12 August 2014|publisher=[[New York Times]]|date=27 May 2014}}</ref>
<ref name=haskins>{{cite journal|last1= Haskins|first1= Caryl Parker|last2= Zahl|first2= P. A.|date= 1971|title= The reproductive pattern of Dinoponera grandis Roger (Hymenoptera, Ponerinae) with notes on the ethology of the species |journal= [[Psyche (entomological journal)|Psyche]]|volume= 78|issue= |pages= 1–11}}</ref>
<ref name=holldobler>[[Bert Hölldobler|Hölldobler, Bert]] and [[E. O. Wilson]]. Chapter "Caste and Division of Labor" in ''[[The Ants]]''. [[Harvard University Press]]. Pp.301 & 305. 1990. ISBN 9780674040755</ref>
<ref name=ito>{{cite journal |last= Ito|first= Fuminori|last2= |first2= |date= 1993|title= Social organization in a primitive ponerine ant: queenless reproduction, dominance hierarchy and functional polygyny in Amblyopone sp. (reclinata group) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae)|url= |journal= [[Journal of Natural History]]|publisher= [[Taylor and Francis]]|volume= 27|issue= 6|pages= |doi= 10.1080/00222939300770751|accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=karnik>{{cite journal |last= Karnik|first= Nutan|last2= Channaveerappa|first2= H.|last3= Ranganath|first3= H. A.|last4= Gadagkar|first4= Raghavendra|date= 2010|title= Karyotype instability in the ponerine ant genus ''Diacamma''|url= |journal= [[Journal of Genetics]]|publisher= [[Indian Academy of Sciences]]|volume= 89|issue= |pages= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=martins>Crespi, Bernard J. (Emília P. Martins, ed.). Chapter 9 ("Comparative Analysis of the Origins and Losses of Eusociality: Causal Mosaics and Historical Uniqueness") Part 6 ("Formicidae") in ''Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior''. [[Oxford University Press]]. Pg.272. 1996. ISBN 9780195092103</ref>
<ref name=monnin>{{cite journal |last= Monnin|first= Thibaud|last2= Ratnieks|first2= Francis L. W.|last3= Jones|first3= Graeme R.|last4= Beard|last4= Richard|date= 5 September 2002|title= Pretender punishment induced by chemical signalling in a queenless ant|url= |journal= [[Nature (journal)|Nature]]|publisher= [[Nature Publishing Group]]|volume= 419|issue= |pages= 61–65|doi= 10.1038/nature00932|accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=noel>Noël, Carine. "[http://www.cnrs.fr/cw/en/pres/compress/fourmis2.htm How queenless ants regulate their conflicts]." [[Centre national de la recherche scientifique|CNRS]]. 6 September 2002.</ref>
<ref name=peeters84>{{cite journal |last= Peeters|first= Christian|last2= Crewe|first2= Robin|date= 1984|title= Insemination Controls the Reproductive Division of Labour in a Ponerine Ant|url= |journal= [[Naturwissenschaften]]|publisher= [[Springer-Verlag]]|volume= 71|issue= |pages= 50–51|doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=peeters85>{{cite journal |last= Peeters|first= Christian|last2= Crewe|first2= Robin M.|date= 1985|title= Worker reproduction in the ponerine ant Ophthalmopone berthoudi: an alternative form of eusocial organization|url= |journal= [[Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology]]|publisher= [[Springer Science+Business Media]]|volume= 18|issue= |pages= 29–37|doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=peeters87>{{cite journal |last= Peeters|first= Christian P.|last2= |first2= |date= 1987|title= The Reproductive Division of Labour in the Queenless Ponerine Ant Rhytidoponera sp. 12|url= |journal= [[Insectes Sociaux]]|publisher= [[Birkhäuser Verlag]]|volume= 34|issue= |pages= 75–86|doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=peeters95>{{cite journal |last= Peeters|first= Christian|last2= Hölldobler|first2= Bert|date= November 1995|title= Reproductive cooperation between queens and their mated workers: The complex life history of an ant with a valuable nest|url= |journal= [[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]]|publisher= [[United States National Academy of Sciences]]|volume= 92|issue= |pages= 10977–10979|doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=peeters00>{{cite journal |last= Peeters|first= Christian|last2= Hölldobler|first2= Bert|date= 2000|title= Sexual reproduction by both queens and workers in the ponerine ant ''Harpegnathos saltator''|url= |journal= [[Insectes Sociaux]]|publisher= [[Birkhäuser Verlag]]|volume= 47|issue= |pages= 325–332|doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=peeters01>{{cite journal |last= Peeters|first= Christian|last2= Ito|first2= Fuminori|date= 2001|title= Colony Dispersal and the Evolution of Queen Morphology in Social Hymenoptera|url= |journal= [[Annual Review of Entomology]]|publisher= [[Annual Reviews]]|volume= 46|issue= |pages= 601–30|doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=schilder>{{cite journal |last= Schilder|first= Klaus|last2= Heinze|first2= Jürgen|last3= Hölldobler|first3= Bert|date= January 1999|title= Colony structure and reproduction in the thelytokous parthenogenetic ant ''Platythyrea punctata'' (F. Smith) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)|url= |journal= [[Insectes Sociaux]]|publisher= [[Birkhäuser Verlag]]|volume= 46|issue= 2|pages= 150–158|doi= 10.1007/s000400050126|accessdate=}}</ref>
<ref name=schmidt>{{cite book|last1=Schmidt|first1=Chris A|title=Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic revision of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae)|date=2011|publisher=ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing|isbn=978-1244009004|page=142|url=http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Sby7w0Hec6EC&pg=PA142&lpg=PA142&dq=Leptogenys+gamergates&source=bl&ots=trOkkoM7Qn&sig=-z0oCmVXdhtILR-1md57AK-4Npo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ZHLpU5zOIpHtoASttILQBA&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Leptogenys%20gamergates&f=false|accessdate=12 August 2014}}</ref>
<ref name=tebeau>Tebeau, Andrew. "Reproductive strategies and colony relatedness in the invasive ponerine and ''Pachycondyla chinensis'' (Emery)." Clemson University. ''All Theses''. Paper 626. Pp.18–19. 2009.</ref>
<ref name=veeresh>{{cite book|last1= Veeresh|first1= G.K.|last2= Mallik|first2= B.|title= Social Insects and the Environment: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of IUSSI, 1990 (International Union for the Study of Social Insects)|date= 1991|publisher= Brill Academic Pub|isbn= 978-9004093164|page= 234|url= http://books.google.com.au/books?id=ZsMUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA234&lpg=PA234&dq=ants+with+gamergates&source=bl&ots=PLHOHfz4Lr&sig=ZRiSYkKqE0u84k063FolU4J11Hg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=rG3pU-zlGYi8oQTYnoL4DQ&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=ants%20with%20gamergates&f=false|accessdate= 12 August 2014}}</ref>
<ref name=veron>{{cite journal |last= Véron|first= Géraldine|last2= |first2= |date= February 2005|title= La reine des fourmis couronnée au combat|url= http://web.archive.org/web/20050210024631/http://www2.cnrs.fr/presse/journal/1965.htm|journal= Le Journal de CNRS|publisher= [[Centre national de la recherche scientifique|CNRS]]|volume= |issue= 181|pages= 50–51|doi= |accessdate=9 September 2014}}</ref>
}}


[[Category:Ants]]
[[Category:Ants]]

Revision as of 04:37, 10 September 2014

Lateral view of a female Pachycondyla berthoudi worker – the ant for which the term "gamegate" was originally coined.

A gamergate is a reproductively viable female worker ant that is able to reproduce with mature males when the colony is lacking a queen. Most commonly occurring within the primitive species of the Poneromorph subfamilies, gamergate females differentiate from their fellow workers by a combination of elevated fecundity and aggression-related mutilation of competitors' secondary sexual characteristics. Subsequent to their first mating event, however, aggression is no longer needed as females secrete chemical signals that lead the workers to accept their role as reproducers for the colony.

Gamergates exist in colonies with winged and ergatoid queens as well as singly in monogynous colonies and alongside other reproductively viable gamergates in polygynous colonies. Most gamergate species are solitary generalist foragers living in arid environments.

Etymology

The term "gamergate" derives from the Greek word γάμος (gámos) and means "married worker." It was coined in 1983 by geneticist William L. Brown[1] and was first used in scientific literature by entomologists Christian Peeters and Robin Crewe in a 1984 paper published in Naturwissenschaften.[2] The definition typically found in entomological dictionaries is "mated, egg-laying worker,"[3][4] and is drawn from the glossary of Bert Hölldobler and E. O. Wilson's 1990 book, The Ants.[3]

Overview

There exist between one hundred and two hundred different species of queenless ants (roughly 1% of all ants), most of which fall within the Poneromorph subfamilies. Whereas female workers in colonies with a queen are morphologically incapable of mating, in gamergate societies a single reproductive worker and sometimes a cadre of dominant female workers have active ovaries.[5] Gamergate lifespan is short compared to queens in queenright colonies, but gamergates can be replaced by other dominant workers in the colony without risking colony survival. Reproductive investment in gamergate females is thus optimized because non-differentiated gamergates (i.e. reproductively inactive workers) function as laborers.[6]

Caste structure

Dorsal view of a nonreproductive female Diacamma australe worker. Note the lack of anterior thoracic gemmae.

Within gamergate colonies all females are born reproductively viable and thus represent potential gamergates. Prior to differentiation as a gamergate a dominant female workers must physically inhibit its sisters. For example in the case of Diacamma australe, the first females to reach maturity will clip off the thoracic gemmae of their sisters. This mutilation greatly reduces the attractiveness of the female as a mate. Thereafter persistent domination of worker females by gamergates via physical aggression all but ensure that they will not produce male offspring.[7] In Diacamma nilgiri gamergates use dominance interactions to monopolize reproduction without mutilation of sister workers.[8] The same is true for Streblognathus peetersi which engage in non-injurious aggression "games" to determine dominance.[2] For all gamergate species, the act of mating eliminates the need to physically dominate female workers. Instead newly produced pheromones or signaling chemicals ensure that workers remain nonreproductive. Although it is unknown to what degree these chemicals act as pheromones or as signals, support for the signaling hypothesis can be found in the loss of gamergate reproductive inhibition of workers as the gamergate grows older and her fecundity diminishes.[7]

When a reproductive gamergate dies, it is replaced by a former dominant worker who becomes a new gamergate. New gamergates often emerge from the female cohort closes to maturity at the time of death of the previous gamergate, but in some cases this event triggers adult female workers to differentiate directly to gamergates. For example, when a queen dies in a Harpegnathos saltator colony, workers of the colony will begin to fight for dominance to become the next queen and reproduce the next eggs.[9] Because reproductively inactive workers are able to become reproductive again after the death of the gamergate, some gamergate species can be considered cooperative breeders rather than truly eusocial insects.[10]

In colonies with queens, gamergates, and workers, gamergates occupy an intermediate caste.[5] Research on Amblyoponini species displaying gamergate social structures has found that there is a fecundity-based hierarchy within the gamergate caste as well. In a study on Amblyopone sp., it was found that higher-ranked gamergates had more fully developed oocytes than low-ranked gamergates. The near absence of sterile gamergates suggests to researchers that particularly low-ranked gamergates may be expelled from their colonies.[11] A three-tiered gamergate hierarchy also occurs within Streblognathus peetersi with only alpha-gamergates reproducing while beta- and gamma-gamergates await a chance to reproduce when an alpha-gamergate has lost her fecundity or died.[2] Challenges to top-ranked gamergates from workers of the lower-hierarchies are risky for the challenger because gamergates of species like Dinoponera quadriceps may mark the challenger by stinging her with special chemicals only produced by the dominant gamergate. These chemicals signal other workers to immobilize the challenger by biting her appendages and holding her for up to a few days until the threat has passed.[12]

The role that the dominated worker plays in selection of reproductive females is seen in the expulsion of infertile gamergates in Amblyopone colonies,[11] and it is even more apparent in Dinoponera quadriceps where workers may choose to ignore the chemical marker stung by the dominant gamergate. If the dominant gamergate is less reproductively fit than the challenger, workers may instead bite the appendages of the gamergate and hold her immobilized allowing a more fecund challenger to establish herself as the new alpha-gamergate. By playing a part in the selection of gamergates, dominated workers are able to increase their indirect reproduction.[5]

Social structure variation and ecology

There is variation within the social structure of ant colonies with a gamergate caste. Some species such as Harpegnathos saltator,[13] Pachycondyla spp., Gnamptogynes menadensis, and Rhytidoponera confusa have a winged alate queen caste, a gamergate caste, and a non-reproductive worker caste.[14] Some species that normally have a queen caste have been shown to persist for long periods of time by relying on the gamergate caste. For example, a colony of Myrmecia pyriformis in 1998 was collected and lasted three years reproducing without a queen ant.[15]

Queenless species with only gamergates and workers may have a monogynous structure with a single gamergate female reproducing for the entire colony like a queen or they may have a polygynous structure with multiple reproductive gamergates laying diploid eggs. Examples of monogynous queenless species include Pachycondyla krugeri, P. sublaevis, Diacamma australe, D. rugosum, Platythyrea lamellosa, and Streblognathus aethiopicus among others.[16] For monogynous gamegates, social regulation is based on morphometry (sexual attractiveness) and fecundity (ovarian oogenesis). Examples of polygynous queenless species include Ophthalmopone berthoudi, O. hottentota, Dinoponera quadriceps, and all known queenless species of Rhytidoponera spp.[16] In the queenless Pachycondyla berthoudi (junior synonym of Pachycondyla strigulosa), foreign males visit underground nests to mate with the polygynous gamergate workers.[17]

Yet other systems exist for example in Pachycondyla spp. where gamergates and ergatogynes share a colony with workers.[18]

Ecologically, gamergate species from different tribes and genera often tend to share certain characteristics. Most gamergate species are solitary generalist foragers living in arid environments.[6] Like ergatoid systems, the evolution of gamergate social structure is hypothesized to be a response to frequent colonial fission events such as periodic flooding or changes in microclimate such as might occur in harsh arid climates. Myrmecologists Christian Peeters and Fuminori Ito have also suggested that "the evolution of gamergate reproduction appears strongly associated with the adaptive benefits of secondary polygyny (e.g. increased colony lifespan and resource inheritance), and it is the preferred option in species havinf workers able to reproduce sexually."[14]

Classification dispute

The utility of "gamergate" as a morphological designation is not without critics. Within the field of myrmecology it is a matter of dispute whether caste should be defined primarily by reproductive role or by physical morphology. Notably, Alfred Buschinger has argued that the term "worker" should be applied only to those ants who make up the non-reproductive caste and "queen" should be applied only to reproductively viable female ants regardless of their physical appearance. Hölldobler and Wilson suggest that the two positions can be semantically resolved and that the most fruitful approach would be to keep classification "somewhat loose, incorporating either anatomy or roles in a manner that maximizes convenience, precision, and clarity of expression."[19]

Genera with gamergates

This list may be incomplete and may require expansion:

See also

References

  1. ^ Peeters, Christian; Crewe, Robin (1984). "Insemination Controls the Reproductive Division of Labour in a Ponerine Ant". Naturwissenschaften. 71. Springer-Verlag: 50–51.
  2. ^ a b c Véron, Géraldine (February 2005). "La reine des fourmis couronnée au combat". Le Journal de CNRS (181). CNRS: 50–51. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  3. ^ a b Barrows, Edward M. Entry on "Caste - Gamergate" in Animal Behavior Desk Reference: A Dictionary of Animal Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution (Third Edition). CRC Press. Pg.75. 2011. ISBN 9781439836514
  4. ^ Gordh, Gordon. Entry on "Gamergate" in A Dictionary of Entomology. CABI. Pg.608. 2011. ISBN 9781845935429
  5. ^ a b c Noël, Carine. "How queenless ants regulate their conflicts." CNRS. 6 September 2002.
  6. ^ a b Choe, Jae C. and Bernard J. Crespi. Chapter "Morphologically 'Primitive' Ants" in The Evolution of Social Behaviour in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press. Pg.385. 1997. ISBN 9780521589772
  7. ^ a b Bourke, Andrew F. G. Chapter 7 ("Kin Conflict: Reproduction") Part 2 ("Queen Policing, Queen Control, and Queen Signaling") in Social Evolution in Ants: Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press. Pp.239–240. 1995. ISBN 9780691044262
  8. ^ Karnik, Nutan; Channaveerappa, H.; Ranganath, H. A.; Gadagkar, Raghavendra (2010). "Karyotype instability in the ponerine ant genus Diacamma". Journal of Genetics. 89. Indian Academy of Sciences.
  9. ^ Gorman, James (27 May 2014). "The Ant Queen Is Dead. Let the Battles Begin". New York Times. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
  10. ^ Crespi, Bernard J. (Emília P. Martins, ed.). Chapter 9 ("Comparative Analysis of the Origins and Losses of Eusociality: Causal Mosaics and Historical Uniqueness") Part 6 ("Formicidae") in Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior. Oxford University Press. Pg.272. 1996. ISBN 9780195092103
  11. ^ a b c Ito, Fuminori (1993). "Social organization in a primitive ponerine ant: queenless reproduction, dominance hierarchy and functional polygyny in Amblyopone sp. (reclinata group) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae)". Journal of Natural History. 27 (6). Taylor and Francis. doi:10.1080/00222939300770751.
  12. ^ Monnin, Thibaud; Ratnieks, Francis L. W.; Jones, Graeme R.; Richard (5 September 2002). "Pretender punishment induced by chemical signalling in a queenless ant". Nature. 419. Nature Publishing Group: 61–65. doi:10.1038/nature00932.
  13. ^ Peeters, Christian; Hölldobler, Bert (November 1995). "Reproductive cooperation between queens and their mated workers: The complex life history of an ant with a valuable nest". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 92. United States National Academy of Sciences: 10977–10979.
  14. ^ a b Peeters, Christian; Ito, Fuminori (2001). "Colony Dispersal and the Evolution of Queen Morphology in Social Hymenoptera". Annual Review of Entomology. 46. Annual Reviews: 601–30.
  15. ^ a b Dietemann, V.; Peeters, C; Hölldobler, B. (2004). "Gamergates in the Australian ant subfamily Myrmeciinae". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (9): 432–435.
  16. ^ a b Veeresh, G.K.; Mallik, B. (1991). Social Insects and the Environment: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of IUSSI, 1990 (International Union for the Study of Social Insects). Brill Academic Pub. p. 234. ISBN 978-9004093164. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
  17. ^ a b "Species: Pachycondyla berthoudi". antweb.org. AntWeb. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
  18. ^ Tebeau, Andrew. "Reproductive strategies and colony relatedness in the invasive ponerine and Pachycondyla chinensis (Emery)." Clemson University. All Theses. Paper 626. Pp.18–19. 2009.
  19. ^ a b Hölldobler, Bert and E. O. Wilson. Chapter "Caste and Division of Labor" in The Ants. Harvard University Press. Pp.301 & 305. 1990. ISBN 9780674040755
  20. ^ Peeters, Christian P. (1987). "The Reproductive Division of Labour in the Queenless Ponerine Ant Rhytidoponera sp. 12". Insectes Sociaux. 34. Birkhäuser Verlag: 75–86.
  21. ^ Schilder, Klaus; Heinze, Jürgen; Hölldobler, Bert (January 1999). "Colony structure and reproduction in the thelytokous parthenogenetic ant Platythyrea punctata (F. Smith) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)". Insectes Sociaux. 46 (2). Birkhäuser Verlag: 150–158. doi:10.1007/s000400050126.
  22. ^ Peeters, Christian; Hölldobler, Bert (2000). "Sexual reproduction by both queens and workers in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos saltator". Insectes Sociaux. 47. Birkhäuser Verlag: 325–332.
  23. ^ Schmidt, Chris A (2011). Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic revision of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing. p. 142. ISBN 978-1244009004. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
  24. ^ "Genus: Diacamma". antweb.org. AntWeb. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
  25. ^ Haskins, Caryl Parker; Zahl, P. A. (1971). "The reproductive pattern of Dinoponera grandis Roger (Hymenoptera, Ponerinae) with notes on the ethology of the species". Psyche. 78: 1–11.
  26. ^ Peeters, Christian; Crewe, Robin M. (1985). "Worker reproduction in the ponerine ant Ophthalmopone berthoudi: an alternative form of eusocial organization". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 18. Springer Science+Business Media: 29–37.
  27. ^ "Genus: Streblognathus". antweb.org. AntWeb. Retrieved 12 August 2014.