Dockum Group: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 35°21′22″N 102°54′36″W / 35.356°N 102.910°W / 35.356; -102.910
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Better cites with doi links where possible
Line 25: Line 25:
}}
}}


The '''Dockum''' is a [[Late Triassic]] (approximately late [[Carnian]] through [[Rhaetian]], or 223–200 Ma) [[geologic group]] found primarily on the [[Llano Estacado]] of [[West Texas|western Texas]] and [[eastern New Mexico]] with minor exposures in southwestern [[Kansas]], eastern [[Colorado]], and [[Oklahoma]] panhandle.<ref>Dunaway, R.E., and Fisher, M.J., 1979. Palynology of the Dockum Group (Upper Triassic), Texas, U.S.A. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology, v. 28, p.&nbsp;61–92.</ref> The Dockum reaches a maximum thickness of slightly over 650&nbsp;m but is usually much thinner. The Dockum rests on an [[unconformity]] over the [[Anisian]] (242–234 Ma) aged [[Anton Chico Formation]]. The Dockum and [[Chinle Formation]] were deposited roughly at the same time and share many of the same [[vertebrate]]s and [[plant]] [[fossils]]. They appear to have very similar [[paleoenviroment]]s.<ref>Cornet, B., 1993. Applications and limitations of palynology in age, climatic, and paleoenviromental analyses of Triassic sequences in North America. New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletin 3:75–93.</ref> The two units are approximately separated by the [[Rio Grande]] in central New Mexico. The Chinle and Dockum are thought by some to be two separate units, deposited in separate depositional basins.
The '''Dockum''' is a [[Late Triassic]] (approximately late [[Carnian]] through [[Rhaetian]], or 223–200 Ma) [[geologic group]] found primarily on the [[Llano Estacado]] of [[West Texas|western Texas]] and [[eastern New Mexico]] with minor exposures in southwestern [[Kansas]], eastern [[Colorado]], and [[Oklahoma]] panhandle.<ref name="dunay-fisher-1979">{{cite journal |last1=Dunay |first1=R.E. |last2=Fisher |first2=M.J. |title=Palynology of the Dockum group (Upper Triassic), Texas, U.S.A. |journal=Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology |date=June 1979 |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=61–92 |doi=10.1016/0034-6667(79)90025-3}}</ref> The Dockum reaches a maximum thickness of slightly over 650&nbsp;m but is usually much thinner. The Dockum rests on an [[unconformity]] over the [[Anisian]] (242–234 Ma) aged [[Anton Chico Formation]]. The Dockum and [[Chinle Formation]] were deposited roughly at the same time and share many of the same [[vertebrate]]s and [[plant]] [[fossils]]. They appear to have very similar [[paleoenviroment]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cornet |first1=B. |year=1993 |title=Applications and limitations of palynology in age, climatic, and paleoenviromental analyses of Triassic sequences in North America |journal=New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletin |volume=3 |pages=75–93 |url=https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qbP9CQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA75&dq=Applications+and+limitations+of+palynology+in+age,+climatic,+and+paleoenviromental+analyses+of+Triassic+sequences+in+North+America&ots=WxNz4WOEDb&sig=54MKkhSKWxj_ZBZ6EJMgNq-8Yvw#v=onepage&q=Applications%20and%20limitations%20of%20palynology%20in%20age%2C%20climatic%2C%20and%20paleoenviromental%20analyses%20of%20Triassic%20sequences%20in%20North%20America&f=false |accessdate=1 September 2020}}</ref> The two units are approximately separated by the [[Rio Grande]] in central New Mexico. The Chinle and Dockum are thought by some to be two separate units, deposited in separate depositional basins.


==History of investigation==
==History of investigation==
Line 31: Line 31:


==Stratigraphy==
==Stratigraphy==
Lehman (1994) advocated a simplified stratigraphy of up to five [[geologic formation]]s.<ref>Lehman, T. M. 1994. The saga of the Dockum Group and the case of the Texas/New Mexico boundary fault. New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Bulletin, v. 150, p. 37-51.</ref> The basal unit is the '''Santa Rosa Sandstone''', a braided stream channel-related [[facies]]. The Santa Rosa is overlain by the '''Tecovas Formation''', which is dominated by overbank (distal [[floodplain]]) deposits with lenses of channel-deposits. Minor lacustrine deposits are also occurring. The '''Trujillo Sandstone''', channel-deposits, and '''Cooper Canyon Formation''', overbank deposits with minor channel and lacustrine deposits, are separated from the Santa Rosa-Tecovas by an unconformity. In eastern New Mexico, the '''Redonda Formation''' overlies the Cooper Canyon Formation. The Redonda has gradational eastward transition into the upper Cooper Canyon Formation.
Lehman (1994) advocated a simplified stratigraphy of up to five [[geologic formation]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lehman |first1=T.M. |year=1994 |title=The saga of the Dockum Group and the case of the Texas/New Mexico boundary fault |journal=New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Bulletin |volume=150 |pages=37-51 |url=https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/monographs/bulletins/downloads/150/B150.pdf |accessdate=1 September 2020}}</ref> The basal unit is the '''Santa Rosa Sandstone''', a braided stream channel-related [[facies]]. The Santa Rosa is overlain by the '''Tecovas Formation''', which is dominated by overbank (distal [[floodplain]]) deposits with lenses of channel-deposits. Minor lacustrine deposits are also occurring. The '''Trujillo Sandstone''', channel-deposits, and '''Cooper Canyon Formation''', overbank deposits with minor channel and lacustrine deposits, are separated from the Santa Rosa-Tecovas by an unconformity. In eastern New Mexico, the '''Redonda Formation''' overlies the Cooper Canyon Formation. The Redonda has gradational eastward transition into the upper Cooper Canyon Formation.


The Santa Rosa-Tecovas sequence has sediments made up of clasts derived from the north, northeast, and east of the Dockum, very similar to clasts found in the lower Chinle. However, the Trujillo-Cooper Canyon sequence's sediments are derived from the [[Ouachita orogeny|Ouachita orogenic]] belts of the [[Marathon Uplift]].
The Santa Rosa-Tecovas sequence has sediments made up of clasts derived from the north, northeast, and east of the Dockum, very similar to clasts found in the lower Chinle. However, the Trujillo-Cooper Canyon sequence's sediments are derived from the [[Ouachita orogeny|Ouachita orogenic]] belts of the [[Marathon Uplift]].


== Dockum and Chinle correlation ==
== Dockum and Chinle correlation ==
Correlations and ages based on [[Spencer G. Lucas]]' [[Land Vertebrate Faunachron]]s.<ref>Lucas, S.G., 1998. Global Triassic tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, and Palaeoecology, v. 143, p.&nbsp;347–384.</ref> The faunachrons are based on first and last appearances of [[phytosaur]]s.<ref>Lehman, T.M., and Chatterjee, S., 2005. Depositional setting and vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Triassic Dockum Group of Texas. Journal of Earth System Science, v. 114, p. 325-351.</ref> Simplified Chinle [[stratigraphy]] based on Litwin.<ref>Litwin, R.J., Traverse, A., and Ash, S.R., 1991. Preliminary palynological zonation of the Chinle Formation, southwestern U.S.A., and its correlation to the Newark Supergroup (eastern U.S.A.). Review of Paleobotany and Palynology, v. 77, p.&nbsp;269–287.</ref>
Correlations and ages based on [[Spencer G. Lucas]]' [[Land Vertebrate Faunachron]]s.<ref name="lucas-1998">{{cite journal |last1=Lucas |first1=Spencer G |title=Global Triassic tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology |journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology |date=November 1998 |volume=143 |issue=4 |pages=347–384 |doi=10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00117-5}}</ref> The faunachrons are based on first and last appearances of [[phytosaur]]s.<ref name="lehman-chatterjee-2005">{{cite journal |last1=Lehman |first1=Thomas |last2=Chatterjee |first2=Sankar |title=Depositional setting and vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Triassic Dockum Group of Texas |journal=Journal of Earth System Science |date=June 2005 |volume=114 |issue=3 |pages=325–351 |doi=10.1007/BF02702953}}</ref> Simplified Chinle [[stratigraphy]] based on Litwin.<ref name="litwin-etal-1991">{{cite journal |last1=Litwin |first1=Ronald J. |last2=Traverse |first2=Alfred |last3=Ash |first3=Sidney R. |title=Preliminary palynological zonation of the Chinle formation, southwestern U.S.A., and its correlation to the Newark supergroup (eastern U.S.A.) |journal=Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology |date=July 1991 |volume=68 |issue=3-4 |pages=269–287 |doi=10.1016/0034-6667(91)90028-2}}</ref>


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"

Revision as of 16:43, 1 September 2020

Dockum Group
Stratigraphic range: late Carnian-Rhaetian
~223–200 Ma
Steamboat Butte, showing Dockum Group red beds at its base
TypeGroup
Sub-unitsSee text
UnderliesExeter Sandstone
OverliesAnton Chico Formation
Lithology
PrimarySandstone
OtherSiltstone, Mudstone
Location
Coordinates35°21′22″N 102°54′36″W / 35.356°N 102.910°W / 35.356; -102.910
Country United States
Type section
Named forTown of Dockum, Texas
Named byWilliam Fletcher Cummins
Year defined1890

The Dockum is a Late Triassic (approximately late Carnian through Rhaetian, or 223–200 Ma) geologic group found primarily on the Llano Estacado of western Texas and eastern New Mexico with minor exposures in southwestern Kansas, eastern Colorado, and Oklahoma panhandle.[1] The Dockum reaches a maximum thickness of slightly over 650 m but is usually much thinner. The Dockum rests on an unconformity over the Anisian (242–234 Ma) aged Anton Chico Formation. The Dockum and Chinle Formation were deposited roughly at the same time and share many of the same vertebrates and plant fossils. They appear to have very similar paleoenviroments.[2] The two units are approximately separated by the Rio Grande in central New Mexico. The Chinle and Dockum are thought by some to be two separate units, deposited in separate depositional basins.

History of investigation

There is no designated type locality for this formation. The Dockum was named by William Fletcher Cummins for a good exposure in vicinity of town of Dockum in Dickens County, Texas, in 1890.[3] Lucas included the Dockum Group within the Chinle when he raised the Chinle to group status.[4] Most researchers still maintain the Chinle is a formation and separate from the Dockum Group. Dockum was named before the Chinle, and if Lucas is correct, his "Chinle Group" should be named the Dockum Group due to stratigraphic nomenclature rules.

Stratigraphy

Lehman (1994) advocated a simplified stratigraphy of up to five geologic formations.[5] The basal unit is the Santa Rosa Sandstone, a braided stream channel-related facies. The Santa Rosa is overlain by the Tecovas Formation, which is dominated by overbank (distal floodplain) deposits with lenses of channel-deposits. Minor lacustrine deposits are also occurring. The Trujillo Sandstone, channel-deposits, and Cooper Canyon Formation, overbank deposits with minor channel and lacustrine deposits, are separated from the Santa Rosa-Tecovas by an unconformity. In eastern New Mexico, the Redonda Formation overlies the Cooper Canyon Formation. The Redonda has gradational eastward transition into the upper Cooper Canyon Formation.

The Santa Rosa-Tecovas sequence has sediments made up of clasts derived from the north, northeast, and east of the Dockum, very similar to clasts found in the lower Chinle. However, the Trujillo-Cooper Canyon sequence's sediments are derived from the Ouachita orogenic belts of the Marathon Uplift.

Dockum and Chinle correlation

Correlations and ages based on Spencer G. Lucas' Land Vertebrate Faunachrons.[6] The faunachrons are based on first and last appearances of phytosaurs.[7] Simplified Chinle stratigraphy based on Litwin.[8]

Sub-stage Faunachron Chinle Dockum
late Norian-Rhaetian Apachean Rock Point/Church Rock Redonda
early to middle Norian Revueltian Owl Rock, Upper Petrified Forest Cooper Canyon
upper late Carnian Adamanian Upper Petrified Forest, Moss Back, Monitor Butte Trujillo, Tecovas
lower late Carnian Otischalkian Shinarump, Temple Mountain Santa Rosa

See also

References

  1. ^ Dunay, R.E.; Fisher, M.J. (June 1979). "Palynology of the Dockum group (Upper Triassic), Texas, U.S.A.". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 28 (1): 61–92. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(79)90025-3.
  2. ^ Cornet, B. (1993). "Applications and limitations of palynology in age, climatic, and paleoenviromental analyses of Triassic sequences in North America". New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletin. 3: 75–93. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
  3. ^ Cummins, W.F. 1892. Report on the geography, topography, and geology of the Llano Estacado or Staked Plains with notes on the geology of the country west of the Plains. In: Dumble, E.T. (ed), Third annual report of the Geological Survey of Texas 1891. Austin: Henry Hutchings, State Printer.
  4. ^ Lucas, S.G., 1993. The Chinle Group: revised stratigraphy and biochronology of Upper Triassic Nonmarine strata in the western United States. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, v. 59, p. 27–50.
  5. ^ Lehman, T.M. (1994). "The saga of the Dockum Group and the case of the Texas/New Mexico boundary fault" (PDF). New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Bulletin. 150: 37–51. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
  6. ^ Lucas, Spencer G (November 1998). "Global Triassic tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 143 (4): 347–384. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00117-5.
  7. ^ Lehman, Thomas; Chatterjee, Sankar (June 2005). "Depositional setting and vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Triassic Dockum Group of Texas". Journal of Earth System Science. 114 (3): 325–351. doi:10.1007/BF02702953.
  8. ^ Litwin, Ronald J.; Traverse, Alfred; Ash, Sidney R. (July 1991). "Preliminary palynological zonation of the Chinle formation, southwestern U.S.A., and its correlation to the Newark supergroup (eastern U.S.A.)". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 68 (3–4): 269–287. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(91)90028-2.

External links