Neurogenic claudication: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added new section, current research
added information about the current research and current research needs for the topic
Line 133: Line 133:
Treatment options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} aim to cure the underlying cause of the condition, such as [[lumbar spinal stenosis]] (LSS) or other degenerative spinal diseases. Decreased walking and lower body motor ability due to {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} is the primary disabling feature of LSS.<ref name=":0" /> Constant discomfort and pain in the lower extremities and an inability to sleep lying down are also disabling features of {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} that affect a patient's quality of life. Therefore the target of most treatments is to solve these complications. <ref name=":0" /> Currently, several treatment options are available to patients, and they can be grouped broadly into nonsurgical and surgical options.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":58" /> Nonsurgical treatments include medications, physical therapy, and spinal injections. Medication options for neurogenic claudication have included [[Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs|non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)]], [[prostaglandin|prostaglandin-based drug]]s, [[gabapentin]], and [[methylcobalamin]]. However, the quality of evidence supporting their use is not high enough for specific recommendations. Physical therapy is commonly prescribed to patients, but the quality of evidence supporting its use for neurogenic claudication is also low.<ref name=":77" /> One quarter of all [[Epidural administration|epidural injections]] are administered to treat symptoms of {{Abbr|LSS|lumbar spinal stenosis}}.<ref name=":0" /> Preparations may contain [[lidocaine]] and/or [[Epidural steroid injection|steroids]]. They may be considered for short-term pain relief or to delay surgery, but their benefit is considered small.<ref name=":09" />
Treatment options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} aim to cure the underlying cause of the condition, such as [[lumbar spinal stenosis]] (LSS) or other degenerative spinal diseases. Decreased walking and lower body motor ability due to {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} is the primary disabling feature of LSS.<ref name=":0" /> Constant discomfort and pain in the lower extremities and an inability to sleep lying down are also disabling features of {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} that affect a patient's quality of life. Therefore the target of most treatments is to solve these complications. <ref name=":0" /> Currently, several treatment options are available to patients, and they can be grouped broadly into nonsurgical and surgical options.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":58" /> Nonsurgical treatments include medications, physical therapy, and spinal injections. Medication options for neurogenic claudication have included [[Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs|non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)]], [[prostaglandin|prostaglandin-based drug]]s, [[gabapentin]], and [[methylcobalamin]]. However, the quality of evidence supporting their use is not high enough for specific recommendations. Physical therapy is commonly prescribed to patients, but the quality of evidence supporting its use for neurogenic claudication is also low.<ref name=":77" /> One quarter of all [[Epidural administration|epidural injections]] are administered to treat symptoms of {{Abbr|LSS|lumbar spinal stenosis}}.<ref name=":0" /> Preparations may contain [[lidocaine]] and/or [[Epidural steroid injection|steroids]]. They may be considered for short-term pain relief or to delay surgery, but their benefit is considered small.<ref name=":09" />


Patients that experience light to mild symptoms are commonly treated through physical therapy, which involves stretching and strengthening the lower back, [[Rectus abdominis muscle|abdominal]] (core) and leg muscles.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last=Ammendolia|first=Carlo|last2=Stuber|first2=Kent|last3=de Bruin|first3=Linda K.|last4=Furlan|first4=Andrea D.|last5=Kennedy|first5=Carol A.|last6=Rampersaud|first6=Yoga Raja|last7=Steenstra|first7=Ivan A.|last8=Pennick|first8=Victoria|date=2012-05-01|title=Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22158059/|journal=Spine|volume=37|issue=10|pages=E609–616|doi=10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240d57d|issn=1528-1159|pmid=22158059}}</ref> Common stretches used include the knee to chest stretch, posterior pelvis tilt, neural stretching of the legs, hip-flexor stretch and lower trunk rotation.<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Markman|first=John D.|last2=Gewandter|first2=Jennifer S.|last3=Frazer|first3=Maria E.|last4=Pittman|first4=Christine|last5=Cai|first5=Xueya|last6=Patel|first6=Kushang V.|last7=Jahromi|first7=Babak S.|last8=Dworkin|first8=Robert H.|last9=Burke|first9=Laurie B.|last10=Farrar|first10=John T.|date=2015-10-06|title=Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26354988/|journal=Neurology|volume=85|issue=14|pages=1250–1256|doi=10.1212/WNL.0000000000002000|issn=1526-632X|pmc=4607594|pmid=26354988}}</ref> In conjunction with these stretches, various strengthening exercises are often implemented, targeting the core, lower back and hip muscles. Common exercises include bridges, bird to dog, tabletop leg press, clamshell and knees to chest.<ref name=":8" /><ref> “Lumbar/Core Strength and Stability Exercises”, Princeton University Athletic Medicine, accessed 2 October 2020, <nowiki>https://uhs.princeton.edu/sites/uhs/files/documents/Lumbar.pdf</nowiki>.</ref> Depending on the age, mobility and physical health of patients, a combination of easier and more difficult exercises should be prescribed to suit the patient's needs. More difficult exercises may include the incorporation of [[Strength training|resistance training]] (weights), [[Exercise equipment|gym equipment]] and more explosive movements. Other exercises such as cycling (stationary), swimming and [[Aquatic therapy|water-based activities]] have also been found to strengthen and improve overall stability and strength in the core, lower back and hips.<ref name=":8" /> Ultimately, the aim of physical therapy is to loosen and relax the tight muscles and [[Ligament|ligaments]] that contribute to the symptoms, and to strengthen those muscles to prevent further reocurrences of the condition. However, studies have found conflicting conclusions in regards to the effectiveness of physical therapy as a treatment option for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients.<ref name=":77" /><ref name=":9">{{Cite journal|last=Schneider|first=Michael J.|last2=Ammendolia|first2=Carlo|last3=Murphy|first3=Donald R.|last4=Glick|first4=Ronald M.|last5=Hile|first5=Elizabeth|last6=Tudorascu|first6=Dana L.|last7=Morton|first7=Sally C.|last8=Smith|first8=Clair|last9=Patterson|first9=Charity G.|last10=Piva|first10=Sara R.|date=01 04, 2019|title=Comparative Clinical Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Treatment Methods in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30646197/|journal=JAMA network open|volume=2|issue=1|pages=e186828|doi=10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6828|issn=2574-3805|pmc=6324321|pmid=30646197}}</ref> Thus, the low quality of evidence supporting its use has prompted further research into physical therapy as a treatment option for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} to be necessary. <ref name=":77" /><ref name=":9" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sahin|first=Fusun|last2=Yilmaz|first2=Figen|last3=Kotevoglu|first3=Nurdan|last4=Kuran|first4=Banu|date=2009-10-31|title=The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768244/|journal=Yonsei Medical Journal|volume=50|issue=5|pages=683–688|doi=10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683|issn=0513-5796|pmc=2768244|pmid=19881973}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Macedo|first=Luciana Gazzi|last2=Hum|first2=Abraham|last3=Kuleba|first3=Laura|last4=Mo|first4=Joey|last5=Truong|first5=Linda|last6=Yeung|first6=Mankeen|last7=Battié|first7=Michele C.|date=December 2013|title=Physical Therapy Interventions for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870489/|journal=Physical Therapy|volume=93|issue=12|pages=1646–1660|doi=10.2522/ptj.20120379|issn=0031-9023|pmc=3870489|pmid=23886845}}</ref>
Patients that experience light to mild symptoms are commonly treated through physical therapy, which involves stretching and strengthening the lower back, [[Rectus abdominis muscle|abdominal]] (core) and leg muscles.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last=Ammendolia|first=Carlo|last2=Stuber|first2=Kent|last3=de Bruin|first3=Linda K.|last4=Furlan|first4=Andrea D.|last5=Kennedy|first5=Carol A.|last6=Rampersaud|first6=Yoga Raja|last7=Steenstra|first7=Ivan A.|last8=Pennick|first8=Victoria|date=2012-05-01|title=Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22158059/|journal=Spine|volume=37|issue=10|pages=E609–616|doi=10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240d57d|issn=1528-1159|pmid=22158059}}</ref> Common stretches used include the knee to chest stretch, posterior pelvis tilt, neural stretching of the legs, hip-flexor stretch and lower trunk rotation.<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Markman|first=John D.|last2=Gewandter|first2=Jennifer S.|last3=Frazer|first3=Maria E.|last4=Pittman|first4=Christine|last5=Cai|first5=Xueya|last6=Patel|first6=Kushang V.|last7=Jahromi|first7=Babak S.|last8=Dworkin|first8=Robert H.|last9=Burke|first9=Laurie B.|last10=Farrar|first10=John T.|date=2015-10-06|title=Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26354988/|journal=Neurology|volume=85|issue=14|pages=1250–1256|doi=10.1212/WNL.0000000000002000|issn=1526-632X|pmc=4607594|pmid=26354988}}</ref> In conjunction with these stretches, various strengthening exercises are often implemented, targeting the core, lower back and hip muscles. Common exercises include bridges, bird to dog, tabletop leg press, clamshell and knees to chest.<ref name=":8" /><ref> “Lumbar/Core Strength and Stability Exercises”, Princeton University Athletic Medicine, accessed 2 October 2020, <nowiki>https://uhs.princeton.edu/sites/uhs/files/documents/Lumbar.pdf</nowiki>.</ref> Depending on the age, mobility and physical health of patients, a combination of easier and more difficult exercises should be prescribed to suit the patient's needs. More difficult exercises may include the incorporation of [[Strength training|resistance training]] (weights), [[Exercise equipment|gym equipment]] and more explosive movements. Other exercises such as cycling (stationary), swimming and [[Aquatic therapy|water-based activities]] have also been found to strengthen and improve overall stability and strength in the core, lower back and hips.<ref name=":8" /> Ultimately, the aim of physical therapy is to loosen and relax the tight muscles and [[Ligament|ligaments]] that contribute to the symptoms, and to strengthen those muscles to prevent further reocurrences of the condition. However, studies have found conflicting conclusions in regards to the effectiveness of physical therapy as a treatment option for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients.<ref name=":77" /><ref name=":9">{{Cite journal|last=Schneider|first=Michael J.|last2=Ammendolia|first2=Carlo|last3=Murphy|first3=Donald R.|last4=Glick|first4=Ronald M.|last5=Hile|first5=Elizabeth|last6=Tudorascu|first6=Dana L.|last7=Morton|first7=Sally C.|last8=Smith|first8=Clair|last9=Patterson|first9=Charity G.|last10=Piva|first10=Sara R.|date=01 04, 2019|title=Comparative Clinical Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Treatment Methods in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30646197/|journal=JAMA network open|volume=2|issue=1|pages=e186828|doi=10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6828|issn=2574-3805|pmc=6324321|pmid=30646197}}</ref> Thus, the low quality of evidence supporting its use has prompted further research into physical therapy as a treatment option for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} to be necessary. <ref name=":77" /><ref name=":9" /><ref name=":11">{{Cite journal|last=Sahin|first=Fusun|last2=Yilmaz|first2=Figen|last3=Kotevoglu|first3=Nurdan|last4=Kuran|first4=Banu|date=2009-10-31|title=The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768244/|journal=Yonsei Medical Journal|volume=50|issue=5|pages=683–688|doi=10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683|issn=0513-5796|pmc=2768244|pmid=19881973}}</ref><ref name=":12">{{Cite journal|last=Macedo|first=Luciana Gazzi|last2=Hum|first2=Abraham|last3=Kuleba|first3=Laura|last4=Mo|first4=Joey|last5=Truong|first5=Linda|last6=Yeung|first6=Mankeen|last7=Battié|first7=Michele C.|date=December 2013|title=Physical Therapy Interventions for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870489/|journal=Physical Therapy|volume=93|issue=12|pages=1646–1660|doi=10.2522/ptj.20120379|issn=0031-9023|pmc=3870489|pmid=23886845}}</ref>


Medications such as NSAIDs, prostaglandin-based drugs, gabapentin, methylcobalamin and epidural steroid injections are often used in conjunction with physical therapy to treat patients with mild or moderate symptoms of {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}.<ref name=":6" /> The main goal of these medications is to reduce pain and provide temporary relief for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients. NSAIDs and prostaglandin-based medications control [[inflammation]] at sites of nerve damage or pressure by inhibiting [[cyclooxygenase]] activity, and reducing the production of [[Prostaglandin|prostaglandins]], a key contributor of inflammation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kuritzky|first=Louis|last2=Samraj|first2=George P|date=2012-11-28|title=Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of low back pain|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526867/|journal=Journal of Pain Research|volume=5|pages=579–590|doi=10.2147/JPR.S6775|issn=1178-7090|pmc=3526867|pmid=23271922}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ricciotti|first=Emanuela|last2=FitzGerald|first2=Garret A.|date=2011-5|title=Prostaglandins and Inflammation|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081099/|journal=Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology|volume=31|issue=5|pages=986–1000|doi=10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207449|issn=1079-5642|pmc=3081099|pmid=21508345}}</ref> By reducing inflammation, less pressure is put on the nerve roots, decreasing pain, and providing relief for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients.<ref>{{Citation|last=Pahwa|first=Roma|title=Chronic Inflammation|date=2020|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493173/|work=StatPearls|place=Treasure Island (FL)|publisher=StatPearls Publishing|pmid=29630225|access-date=2020-11-15|last2=Goyal|first2=Amandeep|last3=Bansal|first3=Pankaj|last4=Jialal|first4=Ishwarlal}}</ref> Gabapentin aims to reduce pain and provide relief by altering the normal functioning of [[Neurotransmitter|neurotransmitters]] that induce a sensation of pain and discomfort.<ref name=":10">{{Cite book|last=Narain|first=Tasha|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK531934/|title=Gabapentin for Adults with Neuropathic Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness|last2=Adcock|first2=Lorna|date=2018|publisher=Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health|series=CADTH Rapid Response Reports|location=Ottawa (ON)|pmid=30325622}}</ref> However, the exact mechanism of Gabapentin’s functioning in the body is not completely understood and current knowledge is based off experimental studies that target the nervous system.<ref>{{Citation|last=Yasaei|first=Rama|title=Gabapentin|date=2020|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493228/|work=StatPearls|place=Treasure Island (FL)|publisher=StatPearls Publishing|pmid=29630280|access-date=2020-11-15|last2=Katta|first2=Shravan|last3=Saadabadi|first3=Abdolreza}}</ref>  Methylcobalamin is another medication that targets the nervous system to reduce pain and provide {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients with temporary pain-relief. The drug produces [[myelin]] to cover and protect nerves from damage, preventing pain induced from damaged nerve roots, as described in some cases of {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Zhang|first=Ming|last2=Han|first2=Wenjuan|last3=Hu|first3=Sanjue|last4=Xu|first4=Hui|date=2013-12-26|title=Methylcobalamin: A Potential Vitamin of Pain Killer|url=https://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2013/424651/|access-date=2020-11-15|website=Neural Plasticity|language=en}}</ref> Epidural steroid injections are the main epidural injections prescribed to treat {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}. They inhibit the inflammatory cascade signalling to reduce inflammation at sites of spinal nerve damage or pressure.  Consequently, they reduce pain and provide relief to individuals with {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Leem|first=Jeong Gill|date=2014-7|title=Epidural Steroid Injection: A Need for a New Clinical Practice Guideline|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099231/|journal=The Korean Journal of Pain|volume=27|issue=3|pages=197–199|doi=10.3344/kjp.2014.27.3.197|issn=2005-9159|pmc=4099231|pmid=25031804}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=King|first=Wade|last2=Miller|first2=David C.|last3=Smith|first3=Clark C.|last4=Committee|first4=on behalf of the Spine Intervention Society’s Patient Safety|date=2018-02-01|title=Systemic Effects of Epidural Corticosteroid Injection|url=https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/19/2/404/3980036|journal=Pain Medicine|language=en|volume=19|issue=2|pages=404–405|doi=10.1093/pm/pnx173|issn=1526-2375}}</ref> Whilst the use of medications is common among {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients that experience frequent or constant pain, their effectiveness has yielded mixed results in studies.<ref name=":10" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Comer|first=Christine M.|last2=Redmond|first2=Anthony C.|last3=Bird|first3=Howard A.|last4=Conaghan|first4=Philip G.|date=2009-10-01|title=Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists|url=https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-121|journal=BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders|volume=10|issue=1|pages=121|doi=10.1186/1471-2474-10-121|issn=1471-2474|pmc=PMC2762954|pmid=19796387}}</ref> Further research into their viability as a medication for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} is necessary to allow doctors to provide better care and treatment options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ammendolia|first=Carlo|last2=Côté|first2=Pierre|last3=Southerst|first3=Danielle|last4=Schneider|first4=Michael|last5=Budgell|first5=Brian|last6=Bombardier|first6=Claire|last7=Hawker|first7=Gillian|last8=Rampersaud|first8=Y. Raja|date=12 2018|title=Comprehensive Nonsurgical Treatment Versus Self-directed Care to Improve Walking Ability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29935152/|journal=Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation|volume=99|issue=12|pages=2408–2419.e2|doi=10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.014|issn=1532-821X|pmid=29935152}}</ref>
Medications such as NSAIDs, prostaglandin-based drugs, gabapentin, methylcobalamin and epidural steroid injections are often used in conjunction with physical therapy to treat patients with mild or moderate symptoms of {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}.<ref name=":6" /> The main goal of these medications is to reduce pain and provide temporary relief for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients. NSAIDs and prostaglandin-based medications control [[inflammation]] at sites of nerve damage or pressure by inhibiting [[cyclooxygenase]] activity, and reducing the production of [[Prostaglandin|prostaglandins]], a key contributor of inflammation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kuritzky|first=Louis|last2=Samraj|first2=George P|date=2012-11-28|title=Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of low back pain|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526867/|journal=Journal of Pain Research|volume=5|pages=579–590|doi=10.2147/JPR.S6775|issn=1178-7090|pmc=3526867|pmid=23271922}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ricciotti|first=Emanuela|last2=FitzGerald|first2=Garret A.|date=2011-5|title=Prostaglandins and Inflammation|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081099/|journal=Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology|volume=31|issue=5|pages=986–1000|doi=10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207449|issn=1079-5642|pmc=3081099|pmid=21508345}}</ref> By reducing inflammation, less pressure is put on the nerve roots, decreasing pain, and providing relief for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients.<ref>{{Citation|last=Pahwa|first=Roma|title=Chronic Inflammation|date=2020|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493173/|work=StatPearls|place=Treasure Island (FL)|publisher=StatPearls Publishing|pmid=29630225|access-date=2020-11-15|last2=Goyal|first2=Amandeep|last3=Bansal|first3=Pankaj|last4=Jialal|first4=Ishwarlal}}</ref> Gabapentin aims to reduce pain and provide relief by altering the normal functioning of [[Neurotransmitter|neurotransmitters]] that induce a sensation of pain and discomfort.<ref name=":10">{{Cite book|last=Narain|first=Tasha|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK531934/|title=Gabapentin for Adults with Neuropathic Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness|last2=Adcock|first2=Lorna|date=2018|publisher=Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health|series=CADTH Rapid Response Reports|location=Ottawa (ON)|pmid=30325622}}</ref> However, the exact mechanism of Gabapentin’s functioning in the body is not completely understood and current knowledge is based off experimental studies that target the nervous system.<ref>{{Citation|last=Yasaei|first=Rama|title=Gabapentin|date=2020|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493228/|work=StatPearls|place=Treasure Island (FL)|publisher=StatPearls Publishing|pmid=29630280|access-date=2020-11-15|last2=Katta|first2=Shravan|last3=Saadabadi|first3=Abdolreza}}</ref>  Methylcobalamin is another medication that targets the nervous system to reduce pain and provide {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients with temporary pain-relief. The drug produces [[myelin]] to cover and protect nerves from damage, preventing pain induced from damaged nerve roots, as described in some cases of {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Zhang|first=Ming|last2=Han|first2=Wenjuan|last3=Hu|first3=Sanjue|last4=Xu|first4=Hui|date=2013-12-26|title=Methylcobalamin: A Potential Vitamin of Pain Killer|url=https://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2013/424651/|access-date=2020-11-15|website=Neural Plasticity|language=en}}</ref> Epidural steroid injections are the main epidural injections prescribed to treat {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}. They inhibit the inflammatory cascade signalling to reduce inflammation at sites of spinal nerve damage or pressure.  Consequently, they reduce pain and provide relief to individuals with {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Leem|first=Jeong Gill|date=2014-7|title=Epidural Steroid Injection: A Need for a New Clinical Practice Guideline|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099231/|journal=The Korean Journal of Pain|volume=27|issue=3|pages=197–199|doi=10.3344/kjp.2014.27.3.197|issn=2005-9159|pmc=4099231|pmid=25031804}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=King|first=Wade|last2=Miller|first2=David C.|last3=Smith|first3=Clark C.|last4=Committee|first4=on behalf of the Spine Intervention Society’s Patient Safety|date=2018-02-01|title=Systemic Effects of Epidural Corticosteroid Injection|url=https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/19/2/404/3980036|journal=Pain Medicine|language=en|volume=19|issue=2|pages=404–405|doi=10.1093/pm/pnx173|issn=1526-2375}}</ref> Whilst the use of medications is common among {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients that experience frequent or constant pain, their effectiveness has yielded mixed results in studies.<ref name=":10" /><ref name=":13">{{Cite journal|last=Comer|first=Christine M.|last2=Redmond|first2=Anthony C.|last3=Bird|first3=Howard A.|last4=Conaghan|first4=Philip G.|date=2009-10-01|title=Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists|url=https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-121|journal=BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders|volume=10|issue=1|pages=121|doi=10.1186/1471-2474-10-121|issn=1471-2474|pmc=PMC2762954|pmid=19796387}}</ref> Further research into their viability as a medication for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} is necessary to allow doctors to provide better care and treatment options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ammendolia|first=Carlo|last2=Côté|first2=Pierre|last3=Southerst|first3=Danielle|last4=Schneider|first4=Michael|last5=Budgell|first5=Brian|last6=Bombardier|first6=Claire|last7=Hawker|first7=Gillian|last8=Rampersaud|first8=Y. Raja|date=12 2018|title=Comprehensive Nonsurgical Treatment Versus Self-directed Care to Improve Walking Ability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29935152/|journal=Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation|volume=99|issue=12|pages=2408–2419.e2|doi=10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.014|issn=1532-821X|pmid=29935152}}</ref>


Depending on the cause and severity of the condition, surgical options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} vary. Symptoms of {{Abbr|LSS|lumbar spinal stenosis}}, including {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}, are the most common reason patients 65 and older undergo spinal surgery. Surgery is generally reserved for patients whose symptoms do not improve with nonsurgical treatments, and the main objective of surgery is to relieve pressure on the spinal nerve roots and recover normal mobility and quality of life.<ref name=":77" /> [[Spinal decompression|Lower Spinal Decompression]] is considered the mainstay of surgical treatment.<ref name=":15" /> In this procedure, the [[Ligamenta flava|ligamentum flavum]] is first removed, followed by the removal of the [[Osteophyte|superior facet osteophyte]] in the spinal canal, and then the decompression of the spinal nerve root.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4" /> Another surgical method of decompression is the Fenestration method, which involves creating a small window in the spinal canal and then decompressing the nerves.<ref name=":3" /> Alternative surgical options include the use of [[Interspinous process decompression|interspinous process spacers]], minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD) procedure, laminectomy, microdiscectomy and placement of a [[spinal cord stimulator]]. The MILD procedure aims to relieve spinal cord compression by [[percutaneous]] removal of portions of the ligamentum flavum and [[Vertebra#Structure|lamina]].<ref name=":77" /> Laminectomy also involves partial or complete removal and sacrifice of the lamina, but in addition, [[Facet joint|facets]] in one or more segments of the spinal cord are usually sacrificed as well.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /> Microdiscectomy is another surgical alternative which uses small incisions, and a miniature camera for viewing, to enter the spinal cord and release pressure on the nerve roots.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":3" /> Laminoplasty and [[Spinal fusion|spinal fusion surgeries]] are other alternative surgical procedures that can be performed. However, they are relatively new methods which still require more research and advancements in order for it to be safely performed with minimal risks.<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Cite web|title=Neel Anand, MD - Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Director of Spine Trauma|url=https://www.spineuniverse.com/author/2433/anand|access-date=2020-11-14|website=SpineUniverse|language=en}}</ref>
Depending on the cause and severity of the condition, surgical options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} vary. Symptoms of {{Abbr|LSS|lumbar spinal stenosis}}, including {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}, are the most common reason patients 65 and older undergo spinal surgery. Surgery is generally reserved for patients whose symptoms do not improve with nonsurgical treatments, and the main objective of surgery is to relieve pressure on the spinal nerve roots and recover normal mobility and quality of life.<ref name=":77" /> [[Spinal decompression|Lower Spinal Decompression]] is considered the mainstay of surgical treatment.<ref name=":15" /> In this procedure, the [[Ligamenta flava|ligamentum flavum]] is first removed, followed by the removal of the [[Osteophyte|superior facet osteophyte]] in the spinal canal, and then the decompression of the spinal nerve root.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4" /> Another surgical method of decompression is the Fenestration method, which involves creating a small window in the spinal canal and then decompressing the nerves.<ref name=":3" /> Alternative surgical options include the use of [[Interspinous process decompression|interspinous process spacers]], minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD) procedure, laminectomy, microdiscectomy and placement of a [[spinal cord stimulator]]. The MILD procedure aims to relieve spinal cord compression by [[percutaneous]] removal of portions of the ligamentum flavum and [[Vertebra#Structure|lamina]].<ref name=":77" /> Laminectomy also involves partial or complete removal and sacrifice of the lamina, but in addition, [[Facet joint|facets]] in one or more segments of the spinal cord are usually sacrificed as well.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /> Microdiscectomy is another surgical alternative which uses small incisions, and a miniature camera for viewing, to enter the spinal cord and release pressure on the nerve roots.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":3" /> Laminoplasty and [[Spinal fusion|spinal fusion surgeries]] are other alternative surgical procedures that can be performed. However, they are relatively new methods which still require more research and advancements in order for it to be safely performed with minimal risks.<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Cite web|title=Neel Anand, MD - Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Director of Spine Trauma|url=https://www.spineuniverse.com/author/2433/anand|access-date=2020-11-14|website=SpineUniverse|language=en}}</ref>
Line 151: Line 151:
== Current Research ==
== Current Research ==


Current treatment options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} are not diverse and lack extensive and detailed research, resulting in patients having to choose from a small pool of treatment options, some of which are not conclusively effective.<ref name=":77" /> This lack of conclusive evidence to support the effectiveness of treatment options for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} is especially prevalent in nonsurgical treatments, such as physical therapy and medications.<ref name=":9" /><ref name=":13" /> Among surgical interventions for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}, current research into improving methods of surgery to minimize post-surgery complication and to improve quality of life have also been of concern.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Machado|first=Gustavo C.|last2=Ferreira|first2=Paulo H.|last3=Harris|first3=Ian A.|last4=Pinheiro|first4=Marina B.|last5=Koes|first5=Bart W.|last6=van Tulder|first6=Maurits|last7=Rzewuska|first7=Magdalena|last8=Maher|first8=Chris G.|last9=Ferreira|first9=Manuela L.|date=2015-03-30|title=Effectiveness of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378944/|journal=PLoS ONE|volume=10|issue=3|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0122800|issn=1932-6203|pmc=4378944|pmid=25822730}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Anderson|first=David B.|last2=Ferreira|first2=Manuela L.|last3=Harris|first3=Ian A.|last4=Davis|first4=Gavin A.|last5=Stanford|first5=Ralph|last6=Beard|first6=David|last7=Li|first7=Qiang|last8=Jan|first8=Stephen|last9=Mobbs|first9=Ralph J.|last10=Maher|first10=Christopher G.|last11=Yong|first11=Renata|date=2019-02-01|title=SUcceSS, SUrgery for Spinal Stenosis: protocol of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial|url=https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/2/e024944|journal=BMJ Open|language=en|volume=9|issue=2|pages=e024944|doi=10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024944|issn=2044-6055|pmid=30765407}}</ref>

Studies have found that physical therapies such as stretches and strengthening exercises have yielded mixed results in terms of its effectiveness in treating {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}. Reports have shown that physical therapy does aid in treating {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} in patients with light to mild symptoms,<ref name=":9" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wise|first=Jacqui|date=2015-04-07|title=Physical therapy is as effective as surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, study finds|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h1827|journal=BMJ|language=en|volume=350|doi=10.1136/bmj.h1827|issn=1756-1833|pmid=25852064}}</ref> whilst others have shown the contrary.<ref name=":77" /><ref name=":11" /> It has also been found that patients with more severe symptoms of {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} find less long-term success in treating the condition through physical therapy. Thus, doctors have concluded that further research into the effectiveness of physical therapy as a treatment option for {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} is necessary. With more detailed research, doctors will then be able to suggest the best treatment options for their patients, to help them recover from the condition. <ref name=":9" /><ref name=":11" /><ref name=":12" />

Medications commonly prescribed to {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}} patients are generally steroids, pain relievers or anti-inflammations that aim to reduce pain and provide pain-relief. However, studies have found that these medications only provide temporary relief for patients, and do not provide a permanent solution, with symptoms often reoccurring several months following the disuse of medications.<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":14">{{Cite journal|last=Haddadi|first=Kaveh|last2=Asadian|first2=Leila|last3=Isazade|first3=Ahdie|date=2016-01-01|title=Effects of Nasal Calcitonin vs. Oral Gabapentin on Pain and Symptoms of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Clinical Trial Study|url=https://doi.org/10.4137/CMAMD.S39938|journal=Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders|language=en|volume=9|pages=CMAMD.S39938|doi=10.4137/CMAMD.S39938|issn=1179-5441|pmc=PMC4934406|pmid=27398032}}</ref> Hence, doctors have reported that it is important to research possible medications that can provide long term relief or a permanent solution for patients.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":14" /> Currently, Tanezumab, a monoclonal antibody that suppresses nerve activity, has been in development for use in patents with back pain, such as {{Abbr|NC|neurogenic claudication}}.<ref name=":16">{{Cite journal|last=Webb|first=Michael P|last2=Helander|first2=Erik M|last3=Menard|first3=Bethany L|last4=Urman|first4=Richard D|last5=Kaye|first5=Alan D|date=2018-02-21|title=Tanezumab: a selective humanized mAb for chronic lower back pain|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825994/|journal=Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management|volume=14|pages=361–367|doi=10.2147/TCRM.S144125|issn=1176-6336|pmc=5825994|pmid=29503555}}</ref> The drug functions by selectively targeting and inhibiting Nerve Growth Factors (NGF) in the body. By blocking NGF in the body, Tanezumab aims to prevent pain signals produced in the body from reaching the brain, thus, reducing pain and providing relief for patients.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Nair|first=Abhijit S|date=2018|title=Tanezumab: Finally a Monoclonal Antibody for Pain Relief|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069623/|journal=Indian Journal of Palliative Care|volume=24|issue=3|pages=384–385|doi=10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_208_17|issn=0973-1075|pmc=6069623|pmid=30111960}}</ref> Whilst positive results have been shown in several studies, further research is still necessary for its safe and effective use.<ref name=":16" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Patel|first=Mona K.|last2=Kaye|first2=Alan D.|last3=Urman|first3=Richard D.|date=2018-01-01|title=Tanezumab: Therapy targeting nerve growth factor in pain pathogenesis|url=https://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2018;volume=34;issue=1;spage=111;epage=116;aulast=Patel;type=0|journal=Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology|language=en|volume=34|issue=1|pages=111|doi=10.4103/joacp.JOACP_389_15|issn=0970-9185|pmid=29643634}}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 06:54, 15 November 2020

Neurogenic Claudication
Other namesPseudoclaudication
CT scan of spinal stenosis and thickened ligamentum flavum, causing neurogenic claudication
CT scan of spinal stenosis and thickened ligamentum flavum, causing neurogenic claudication
SpecialtyOrthopedics, Neurology, Orthopedic Surgery, Spinal Surgery
SymptomsPain, tingling, tiredness, weakness, numbness or heaviness in the legs, hips, glutes and lower back. Extreme symptoms can include bowel or bladder dysfunction.
ComplicationsProlonged exercise or walking can result in tiredness, discomfort or pain in the lower body. Difficulties standing upright, walking, exercising or performing general tasks can be observed in more severe cases. Discomfort and pain during sleep can occur. Bowel or bladder dysfunction may be present in extreme cases.
Usual onsetGenerally in elderly population (over 60) and as aging continues. Can occur in younger adults due to lumbar spinal stenosis, or other degenerative spinal diseases
DurationVariable from short term to chronic, depending on severity and treatment and management.
CausesPressure on the spinal nerve roots caused by a narrowing in the spinal canal as a result of bulging discs, thickening of ligaments, overgrowth of bone spurs, wear and tear of lower spine. Common diseases that cause this are spinal stenosis and other forms of degenerative spinal diseases.
Risk factorsAge, obesity, previous spinal deformities or problems.
Diagnostic methodPhysical examination, image testing (CT and X-Rays).
Differential diagnosisVascular claudication, trochanteric bursitis, piriformis syndrome, muscle pain, vertebral compression fracture, compartment sydnrome, peripheral neuropathy, Lumbar radicular syndrome (lumbar radiculopathy) and pain in other spinal structures: hip, myofascia, sacroiliac joint
PreventionFrequent stretching and strengthening exercises that focus on the lower body. Practicing good posture when sitting and standing.
TreatmentPhysical therapy in the form of stretching and exercising. Surgery: lower spinal decompression surgery (normal and Fenestration method), laminectomy, microdiscectomy and laminoplastie En-bloc expansive laminoplasty.
MedicationNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prostaglandins, gabapentin, methylcobalamin, epidural injections, lidocaine and steroids
PrognosisLumbar Spinal Stenosis and other forms of degenerative spinal conditions.

Neurogenic claudication (NC), also known as pseudoclaudication, is the most common symptom of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and describes intermittent leg pain from impingement of the nerves emanating from the spinal cord.[1][2] Neurogenic means that the problem originates within the nervous system. Claudication, from the Latin word for to limp, refers to painful cramping or weakness in the legs.[3] NC should therefore be distinguished from vascular claudication, which stems from a circulatory problem rather than a neural one.

The term neurogenic claudication is sometimes used interchangeably with spinal stenosis. However, the former is a clinical term, while the latter more specifically describes the condition of spinal narrowing.[4] NC is a medical condition most commonly caused by damage and compression to the lower spinal nerve roots.[5] It is a neurological and orthopedic condition that affects the motor nervous system of the body, specifically, the lower back, legs, hips and glutes.[5][6] NC does not occur by itself, but rather, is associated with other underlying spinal or neurological conditions such as spinal stenosis or abnormalities and degenerative changes in the spine. The International Association for the Study of Pain defines neurogenic claudication as, "pain from intermittent compression and/or ischemia of a single or multiple nerve roots within an intervertebral foramen or the central spinal canal.[4] This definition reflects the current hypotheses for the pathophysiology of NC, which is thought to be related to the compression of lumbosacral nerve roots by surrounding structures, such as hypertrophied facet joints or ligamentum flavum, bone spurs, scar tissue, and bulging or herniated discs.[7]

The predominant symptoms of NC involve one or both legs and usually presents as some combination of tingling, cramping discomfort, pain, numbness, or weakness in the lower back, calves, glutes, and/or thighs and is precipitated by walking and prolonged standing. However, the symptoms vary depending on the severity and cause of the condition. Lighter symptoms include pain or heaviness in the legs, hips, glutes and lower back, post-exercise.[6][8] Mild to severe symptoms include prolonged constant pain, tiredness and discomfort in the lower half of the body.[6][8] In severe cases, impaired motor function and ability in the lower body can be observed, and bowel or bladder dysfunction may be present.[6][8] Classically, the symptoms and pain of NC are relieved by a change in position or flexion of the waist.[9] Therefore, patients with NC have less disability in climbing steps, pushing carts, and cycling. [1]

Treatment options for NC depends on the severity and cause of the condition, and may be nonsurgical or surgical. Nonsurgical interventions include drugs, physical therapy, and spinal injections.[10] Spinal decompression is the main surgical intervention and is the most common back surgery in patients over 65.[1] Other forms of surgical procedures include: laminectomy, microdiscectomy and laminoplasty.[8][11] Patients with minor symptoms are usually advised to undergo physical therapy, such as stretching and strengthening exercises. In patients with more severe symptoms, medications such as pain relievers and steroids are prescribed in conjunction with physical therapy. Surgical treatments are predominantly used to relieve pressure on the spinal nerve roots and are used when nonsurgical interventions are ineffective or show no effective progress. [1][11]

Diagnosis of neurogenic claudication is based on typical clinical features, the physical exam, and findings of spinal stenosis on CT or X-Ray imaging.[1] In addition to vascular claudication, diseases affecting the spine and musculoskeletal system should be considered in the differential diagnosis.[9]

Signs and Symptoms

Neurogenic claudication commonly describes pain, weakness, fatigue, tingling, weakness, heaviness and/or paresthesias that extend into the lower extremities.[9] These symptoms may involve only one leg, but they usually involve both. Leg pain is usually more significant than back pain in individuals who have both.[12] NC is classically distinguished by symptoms improving or worsening with certain activities and maneuvers. Pain may occur with walking, standing, and/or back extension. Sitting and bending or leaning forward tend to provide relief. Patients may also report that pain is worse while walking down stairs and improved while walking up stairs or using a bicycle or shopping cart.[1] A positive "shopping cart sign" refers to the worsening of pain with spinal extension and improvement with spinal flexion.[10]

Whilst these common symptoms are usually present in many patients with NC, rarer and more serious symptoms can occur in severe cases of NC. In extreme cases of NC constant discomfort, pain or numbness is experienced. This results in patients to have decreased mobility and function as excessive or constant movements cause pain. Exercise and prolonged walking often become difficult and are triggers of pain, tiredness, numbness and heaviness in the legs, lower back and hips.[13] Common tasks such as standing upright for an extended duration or picking up heavy objects may become increasingly difficult to perform.[6][13] In addition, patients with severe NC may experience difficulties sleeping as lying down on their back causes discomfort and pain.[8][13] In very extreme cases, bowel or bladder dysfunction can occur. However, this is a consequence of the underlying cause of NC rather than the condition itself. As most causes of NC involve increased pressure or damage to the nerves in the lower spine, damage and pressure on the nerves that extend to the bowel or bladder may occur, leading to bowel or bladder dysfunction.[14]

On physical examination, patients with NC have normal peripheral pulses.[1] The neurologic exam, straight leg raise, and femoral nerve stretch are typically normal. Abnormal signs may be revealed if the patient is observed walking until they exhibit NC. For example, a positive "stoop test" is observed if bending forward or stooping while walking relieves symptoms.[2] Occasionally, patients may have other signs such as sensory loss or gait changes.[9]

Causes

Neurogenic claudication is the fundamental clinical feature of lumbar spinal stenosis, which may be congenital or acquired. The causes of LSS are most commonly acquired and include degenerative changes such as degenerative disc disease and spinal osteoarthritis. LSS may also be acquired from changes due to spinal surgery such as excess scar tissue or bone formation.[7] Other secondary causes include space-occupying lesions, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Paget's disease. Less commonly, the cause of spinal stenosis may be present at birth as seen in achondroplasia, spina bifida, and certain mucopolysaccharidoses.[15]

Risk factors for LSS include:[16][15]

  • Age
  • Degenerative changes of the spine
  • Obesity
  • Family history of spinal stenosis
  • Tobacco use
  • Occupation involving repetitive mechanical stress on the spine

Diagnosis and Evaluation

MRI of the lumbar spine showing spinal stenosis

Neurogenic claudication is one subtype of the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).[9] No gold standard diagnostic criteria currently exist, but evaluation and diagnosis is generally based on the patient history, physical exam, and medical imaging.[1] The accuracy of a diagnosis of NC increases with each additional suggestive clinical finding. Therefore, a combination of signs and symptoms may be more helpful in diagnosing NC than any single feature of the history or physical exam. These signs and symptoms include pain triggered by standing, pain relieved by sitting, symptoms above the knees, and a positive "shopping cart sign".[4]

Specific questions that may aid diagnosis include:[10]

  • "Does the patient have leg or buttock pain while walking?"
  • "Does the patient flex forward to relieve symptoms?"
  • "Does patient feel relief when using a shopping cart or bicycle?"
  • "Does the patient have motor or sensory disturbance while walking?"
  • "Are the pulses in the foot present and symmetric?"
  • "Does the patient have lower extremity weakness?"
  • "Does the patient have low back pain?"

The physical exam may include observation, evaluation of pulses in the foot, lumbar spine range of motion, and components of a neurological exam.[1]

Helpful imaging may include x-rays, computed tomography (CT), CT myelogram, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but MRI is preferred.[1] Abnormal MRI findings may be present in two-thirds of asymptomatic individuals, and imaging findings of spinal stenosis do not correlate well with symptom severity. Therefore, imaging findings must be considered in the context of a patient's history and physical exam when seeking a diagnosis.[2] The evidence for using objective imaging findings to define neurogenic claudication has been conflicting.[12]

Differential diagnosis

Neurogenic claudication must be differentiated from other causes of leg pain, which may be present in a number of conditions involving the spine and musculoskeletal system. The differential diagnosis for NC includes:[9]

Neurogenic vs vascular claudication

Neurogenic vs Vascular Claudication[2][10][4]
Clinical feature Neurogenic Vascular
Pain worse with Standing, walking Walking
Pain relieved by Spinal flexion, sitting Standing
Timing of relief Within minutes Immediately
Location Above the knees Below the knees
Radiation of pain Extends down legs Extends up legs
Quality of pain Sharp Cramping, dull
Back pain Common Sometimes
Peripheral pulses Present May be absent

Both neurogenic claudication and vascular claudication manifest as leg pain with walking, but several key features help distinguish between these conditions.[7] In contrast to NC, vascular claudication does not vary with changes in posture.[9] Patients with vascular claudication may experience relief with standing, which may provoke symptoms in NC. The walking distance necessary to produce pain in vascular claudication is more consistent than in neurogenic claudication.[12]

Pathophysiology

Degenerative changes cause compression of the spinal cord

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) may trigger the pathogenesis of neurogenic claudication. When intervertebral discs degenerate and change shape in DDD, the normal movements of the spine are interrupted. This results in spinal instability and more degenerative changes in spinal structures including facet joints, ligamentum flavum, and intervertebral discs. These pathologic changes result in narrowing of the vertebral canal and neurovascular compression at the lumbosacral nerve roots.[1][17] However, because the severity of symptoms does not correlate well with the degree of stenosis and nerve root compression, a clear understanding of the specific pathogenesis remains challenging.[7]

It is currently unknown what exactly causes the pain of NC. The two main proposed mechanisms agree that neurovascular compression plays a role. The ischemic theory proposes that poor blood supply to the spinal nerve roots results in NC. In contrast, the venous stasis theory proposes that a combination of low oxygen levels and metabolite buildup are responsible due to venous backup at the cauda equina.[7] Pain with walking may be partially explained by the corresponding increase in nerve root oxygen requirements.[15]

These changes in blood flow may occur during back extension when shifts in vertebral structures and ligaments narrow the spinal canal and compress the neurovasculature.[15] Compared to a neutral position, extended spines exhibit 15% less cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramina, and nerve root compression is present one-third of the time.[10] These dynamic changes in the shape of the spinal canal are more pronounced in individuals with spinal stenosis. The amount of narrowing may be 67% in LSS compared to 9% in healthy spines.[1]

Treatment

Spinal injection into the epidural space

Treatment options for NC aim to cure the underlying cause of the condition, such as lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) or other degenerative spinal diseases. Decreased walking and lower body motor ability due to NC is the primary disabling feature of LSS.[17] Constant discomfort and pain in the lower extremities and an inability to sleep lying down are also disabling features of NC that affect a patient's quality of life. Therefore the target of most treatments is to solve these complications. [17] Currently, several treatment options are available to patients, and they can be grouped broadly into nonsurgical and surgical options.[17][7] Nonsurgical treatments include medications, physical therapy, and spinal injections. Medication options for neurogenic claudication have included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prostaglandin-based drugs, gabapentin, and methylcobalamin. However, the quality of evidence supporting their use is not high enough for specific recommendations. Physical therapy is commonly prescribed to patients, but the quality of evidence supporting its use for neurogenic claudication is also low.[10] One quarter of all epidural injections are administered to treat symptoms of LSS.[17] Preparations may contain lidocaine and/or steroids. They may be considered for short-term pain relief or to delay surgery, but their benefit is considered small.[1]

Patients that experience light to mild symptoms are commonly treated through physical therapy, which involves stretching and strengthening the lower back, abdominal (core) and leg muscles.[18] Common stretches used include the knee to chest stretch, posterior pelvis tilt, neural stretching of the legs, hip-flexor stretch and lower trunk rotation.[18][19] In conjunction with these stretches, various strengthening exercises are often implemented, targeting the core, lower back and hip muscles. Common exercises include bridges, bird to dog, tabletop leg press, clamshell and knees to chest.[19][20] Depending on the age, mobility and physical health of patients, a combination of easier and more difficult exercises should be prescribed to suit the patient's needs. More difficult exercises may include the incorporation of resistance training (weights), gym equipment and more explosive movements. Other exercises such as cycling (stationary), swimming and water-based activities have also been found to strengthen and improve overall stability and strength in the core, lower back and hips.[19] Ultimately, the aim of physical therapy is to loosen and relax the tight muscles and ligaments that contribute to the symptoms, and to strengthen those muscles to prevent further reocurrences of the condition. However, studies have found conflicting conclusions in regards to the effectiveness of physical therapy as a treatment option for NC patients.[10][21] Thus, the low quality of evidence supporting its use has prompted further research into physical therapy as a treatment option for NC to be necessary. [10][21][22][23]

Medications such as NSAIDs, prostaglandin-based drugs, gabapentin, methylcobalamin and epidural steroid injections are often used in conjunction with physical therapy to treat patients with mild or moderate symptoms of NC.[15] The main goal of these medications is to reduce pain and provide temporary relief for NC patients. NSAIDs and prostaglandin-based medications control inflammation at sites of nerve damage or pressure by inhibiting cyclooxygenase activity, and reducing the production of prostaglandins, a key contributor of inflammation.[24][25] By reducing inflammation, less pressure is put on the nerve roots, decreasing pain, and providing relief for NC patients.[26] Gabapentin aims to reduce pain and provide relief by altering the normal functioning of neurotransmitters that induce a sensation of pain and discomfort.[27] However, the exact mechanism of Gabapentin’s functioning in the body is not completely understood and current knowledge is based off experimental studies that target the nervous system.[28]  Methylcobalamin is another medication that targets the nervous system to reduce pain and provide NC patients with temporary pain-relief. The drug produces myelin to cover and protect nerves from damage, preventing pain induced from damaged nerve roots, as described in some cases of NC.[29] Epidural steroid injections are the main epidural injections prescribed to treat NC. They inhibit the inflammatory cascade signalling to reduce inflammation at sites of spinal nerve damage or pressure.  Consequently, they reduce pain and provide relief to individuals with NC.[30][31] Whilst the use of medications is common among NC patients that experience frequent or constant pain, their effectiveness has yielded mixed results in studies.[27][32] Further research into their viability as a medication for NC is necessary to allow doctors to provide better care and treatment options for NC patients.[33]

Depending on the cause and severity of the condition, surgical options for NC vary. Symptoms of LSS, including NC, are the most common reason patients 65 and older undergo spinal surgery. Surgery is generally reserved for patients whose symptoms do not improve with nonsurgical treatments, and the main objective of surgery is to relieve pressure on the spinal nerve roots and recover normal mobility and quality of life.[10] Lower Spinal Decompression is considered the mainstay of surgical treatment.[2] In this procedure, the ligamentum flavum is first removed, followed by the removal of the superior facet osteophyte in the spinal canal, and then the decompression of the spinal nerve root.[5][11] Another surgical method of decompression is the Fenestration method, which involves creating a small window in the spinal canal and then decompressing the nerves.[8] Alternative surgical options include the use of interspinous process spacers, minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD) procedure, laminectomy, microdiscectomy and placement of a spinal cord stimulator. The MILD procedure aims to relieve spinal cord compression by percutaneous removal of portions of the ligamentum flavum and lamina.[10] Laminectomy also involves partial or complete removal and sacrifice of the lamina, but in addition, facets in one or more segments of the spinal cord are usually sacrificed as well.[8][11] Microdiscectomy is another surgical alternative which uses small incisions, and a miniature camera for viewing, to enter the spinal cord and release pressure on the nerve roots.[5][8] Laminoplasty and spinal fusion surgeries are other alternative surgical procedures that can be performed. However, they are relatively new methods which still require more research and advancements in order for it to be safely performed with minimal risks.[11][34]

The use of interspinous spacers is associated with increased costs and rates of reoperation, while evidence comparing effectiveness of the MILD procedure to spinal decompression is insufficient.[7] The effectiveness of laminectomy, microdiscectomy, laminoplasty and spinal fusion surgeries as an alternative to spinal decompression has also been heavily debated, with studies showing conflicting results.[35][36] While studies show that surgery improves walking ability, minimizes constant pain and improves quality of life, comparisons between the efficacy of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of LSS have yielded mixed results.[17][7]

Prognosis

Individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) may be asymptomatic for many years before developing symptoms such as neurogenic claudication.[1] Because those with LSS often seek treatment, the prognosis of untreated LSS is not known. However, estimates suggest that symptoms remain stable in most patients and may improve in one-third. Rapid worsening of symptoms in mild to moderate cases of LSS is unlikely.[7]

Epidemiology

Neurogenic claudication (NC) is associated with increasing age and mostly affects individuals over the age of 60. It is also more likely present in individuals with other spinal comorbidities.[1] NC may be present in greater than 90% of patients with spinal stenosis, which is present in almost half of patients with low back pain and affects over 200,000 people in the United States.[2][1][7]

Roughly 1 in 10 elderly men experience leg pain in combination with low back pain, and the proportion of those affected is doubled in retirement communities.[9] As the global life expectancy increases, the impact of spinal disease symptoms such as NC is likely to increase.[15]

Current Research

Current treatment options for NC are not diverse and lack extensive and detailed research, resulting in patients having to choose from a small pool of treatment options, some of which are not conclusively effective.[10] This lack of conclusive evidence to support the effectiveness of treatment options for NC is especially prevalent in nonsurgical treatments, such as physical therapy and medications.[21][32] Among surgical interventions for NC, current research into improving methods of surgery to minimize post-surgery complication and to improve quality of life have also been of concern.[37][38]

Studies have found that physical therapies such as stretches and strengthening exercises have yielded mixed results in terms of its effectiveness in treating NC. Reports have shown that physical therapy does aid in treating NC in patients with light to mild symptoms,[21][39] whilst others have shown the contrary.[10][22] It has also been found that patients with more severe symptoms of NC find less long-term success in treating the condition through physical therapy. Thus, doctors have concluded that further research into the effectiveness of physical therapy as a treatment option for NC is necessary. With more detailed research, doctors will then be able to suggest the best treatment options for their patients, to help them recover from the condition. [21][22][23]

Medications commonly prescribed to NC patients are generally steroids, pain relievers or anti-inflammations that aim to reduce pain and provide pain-relief. However, studies have found that these medications only provide temporary relief for patients, and do not provide a permanent solution, with symptoms often reoccurring several months following the disuse of medications.[18][40] Hence, doctors have reported that it is important to research possible medications that can provide long term relief or a permanent solution for patients.[19][40] Currently, Tanezumab, a monoclonal antibody that suppresses nerve activity, has been in development for use in patents with back pain, such as NC.[41] The drug functions by selectively targeting and inhibiting Nerve Growth Factors (NGF) in the body. By blocking NGF in the body, Tanezumab aims to prevent pain signals produced in the body from reaching the brain, thus, reducing pain and providing relief for patients.[42] Whilst positive results have been shown in several studies, further research is still necessary for its safe and effective use.[41][43]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Deer, Timothy; Sayed, Dawood; Michels, John; Josephson, Youssef; Li, Sean; Calodney, Aaron K (2019-12-01). "A Review of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication: Disease and Diagnosis". Pain Medicine. 20 (Supplement_2): S32–S44. doi:10.1093/pm/pnz161. ISSN 1526-2375. PMC 7101166. PMID 31808530.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Lee, Seung Yeop; Kim, Tae-Hwan; Oh, Jae Keun; Lee, Seung Jin; Park, Moon Soo (2015). "Lumbar Stenosis: A Recent Update by Review of Literature". Asian Spine Journal. 9 (5): 818–28. doi:10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.818. ISSN 1976-1902. PMC 4591458. PMID 26435805.
  3. ^ Pearce, J.M.S. (2005). "(Neurogenic) Claudication". European Neurology. 54 (2): 118–119. doi:10.1159/000088648. ISSN 0014-3022. PMID 16408366.
  4. ^ a b c d Vining, Robert D.; Shannon, Zacariah K.; Minkalis, Amy L.; Twist, Elissa J. (November 2019). "Current Evidence for Diagnosis of Common Conditions Causing Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Standardized Terminology Recommendations". Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 42 (9): 651–664. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.08.002. PMID 31870637.
  5. ^ a b c d Kobayashi, Shigeru (2014-04-18). "Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis". World Journal of Orthopedics. 5 (2): 134–145. doi:10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.134.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  6. ^ a b c d e Alvarez, J. A.; Hardy, R. H. (1998-04-15). "Lumbar spine stenosis: a common cause of back and leg pain". American Family Physician. 57 (8): 1825–1834, 1839–1840. ISSN 0002-838X. PMID 9575322.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Lurie, Jon; Tomkins-Lane, Christy (2016-01-04). "Management of lumbar spinal stenosis". BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 352: h6234. doi:10.1136/bmj.h6234. ISSN 1756-1833. PMC 6887476. PMID 26727925.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h Critchley, Edmund; Eisen, Andrew (1992). "Disc and Degenerative Disease: Stenosis, Spondylosis and Subluxation". In Swash, Michael (ed.). Clinical Medicine and the Nervous System. Hong Kong: Springer London. pp. 157–180. ISBN 978-1-4471-3353-7.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h Suri, Pradeep; Rainville, James; Kalichman, Leonid; Katz, Jeffrey N. (2010-12-15). "Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?". JAMA. 304 (23): 2628–2636. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1833. ISSN 1538-3598. PMC 3260477. PMID 21156951.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Messiah, Shadi; Tharian, Antony R.; Candido, Kenneth D.; Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick (May 2019). "Neurogenic Claudication: a Review of Current Understanding and Treatment Options". Current Pain and Headache Reports. 23 (5): 32. doi:10.1007/s11916-019-0769-x. ISSN 1531-3433. PMID 30888546. S2CID 83464182.
  11. ^ a b c d e Gala, Raj J.; Yue, James J. (2018). Reach, John; Yue, James J.; Narayan, Deepak; Kaye, Alan; Vadivelu, Nalini (eds.). Perioperative Pain Management for Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery. United States: Oxford University Press. pp. 172–186. doi:10.1093/med/9780190626761.001.0001. ISBN 9780190626761.
  12. ^ a b c Genevay, Stephane; Atlas, Steven J. (April 2010). "Lumbar Spinal Stenosis". Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 24 (2): 253–265. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001. PMC 2841052. PMID 20227646.
  13. ^ a b c Ammendolia, Carlo; Schneider, Michael; Williams, Kelly; Zickmund, Susan; Hamm, Megan; Stuber, Kent; Tomkins-Lane, Christy; Rampersaud, Y. Raja (March 2017). "The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients' perspectives". The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 61 (1): 18–31. ISSN 0008-3194. PMC 5381486. PMID 28413220.
  14. ^ Watanabe, Kazuyuki; Sekiguchi, Miho; Yonemoto, Koji; Nikaido, Takuya; Kato, Kinshi; Otani, Koji; Yabuki, Shoji; Kakuma, Tatsuyuki; Kikuchi, Shin-Ichi; Konno, Shin-Ichi; DISTO-project working group (July 2017). "Bowel/bladder dysfunction and numbness in the sole of the both feet in lumbar spinal stenosis - A multicenter cross-sectional study". Journal of Orthopaedic Science: Official Journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 22 (4): 647–651. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.006. ISSN 1436-2023. PMID 28551282.
  15. ^ a b c d e f S, Munakomi; La, Foris; M, Varacallo (January 2020). "Spinal Stenosis And Neurogenic Claudication" (Document). {{cite document}}: Cite document requires |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |pmid= ignored (help)
  16. ^ Bagley, Carlos; MacAllister, Matthew; Dosselman, Luke; Moreno, Jessica; Aoun, Salah G; El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y (2019-01-31). "Current concepts and recent advances in understanding and managing lumbar spine stenosis". F1000Research. 8: 137. doi:10.12688/f1000research.16082.1. ISSN 2046-1402. PMC 6357993. PMID 30774933.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  17. ^ a b c d e f Ammendolia, Carlo; Stuber, Kent; Tomkins-Lane, Christy; Schneider, Michael; Rampersaud, Y. Raja; Furlan, Andrea D.; Kennedy, Carol A. (2014-03-15). "What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review". European Spine Journal. 23 (6): 1282–1301. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3262-6. ISSN 0940-6719. PMID 24633719. S2CID 12962371.
  18. ^ a b c Ammendolia, Carlo; Stuber, Kent; de Bruin, Linda K.; Furlan, Andrea D.; Kennedy, Carol A.; Rampersaud, Yoga Raja; Steenstra, Ivan A.; Pennick, Victoria (2012-05-01). "Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review". Spine. 37 (10): E609–616. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240d57d. ISSN 1528-1159. PMID 22158059.
  19. ^ a b c d Markman, John D.; Gewandter, Jennifer S.; Frazer, Maria E.; Pittman, Christine; Cai, Xueya; Patel, Kushang V.; Jahromi, Babak S.; Dworkin, Robert H.; Burke, Laurie B.; Farrar, John T. (2015-10-06). "Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach". Neurology. 85 (14): 1250–1256. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002000. ISSN 1526-632X. PMC 4607594. PMID 26354988.
  20. ^  “Lumbar/Core Strength and Stability Exercises”, Princeton University Athletic Medicine, accessed 2 October 2020, https://uhs.princeton.edu/sites/uhs/files/documents/Lumbar.pdf.
  21. ^ a b c d e Schneider, Michael J.; Ammendolia, Carlo; Murphy, Donald R.; Glick, Ronald M.; Hile, Elizabeth; Tudorascu, Dana L.; Morton, Sally C.; Smith, Clair; Patterson, Charity G.; Piva, Sara R. (01 04, 2019). "Comparative Clinical Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Treatment Methods in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial". JAMA network open. 2 (1): e186828. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6828. ISSN 2574-3805. PMC 6324321. PMID 30646197. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  22. ^ a b c Sahin, Fusun; Yilmaz, Figen; Kotevoglu, Nurdan; Kuran, Banu (2009-10-31). "The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis". Yonsei Medical Journal. 50 (5): 683–688. doi:10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683. ISSN 0513-5796. PMC 2768244. PMID 19881973.
  23. ^ a b Macedo, Luciana Gazzi; Hum, Abraham; Kuleba, Laura; Mo, Joey; Truong, Linda; Yeung, Mankeen; Battié, Michele C. (December 2013). "Physical Therapy Interventions for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review". Physical Therapy. 93 (12): 1646–1660. doi:10.2522/ptj.20120379. ISSN 0031-9023. PMC 3870489. PMID 23886845.
  24. ^ Kuritzky, Louis; Samraj, George P (2012-11-28). "Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of low back pain". Journal of Pain Research. 5: 579–590. doi:10.2147/JPR.S6775. ISSN 1178-7090. PMC 3526867. PMID 23271922.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  25. ^ Ricciotti, Emanuela; FitzGerald, Garret A. (2011-5). "Prostaglandins and Inflammation". Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 31 (5): 986–1000. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207449. ISSN 1079-5642. PMC 3081099. PMID 21508345. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  26. ^ Pahwa, Roma; Goyal, Amandeep; Bansal, Pankaj; Jialal, Ishwarlal (2020), "Chronic Inflammation", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 29630225, retrieved 2020-11-15
  27. ^ a b Narain, Tasha; Adcock, Lorna (2018). Gabapentin for Adults with Neuropathic Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness. CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. PMID 30325622.
  28. ^ Yasaei, Rama; Katta, Shravan; Saadabadi, Abdolreza (2020), "Gabapentin", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 29630280, retrieved 2020-11-15
  29. ^ Zhang, Ming; Han, Wenjuan; Hu, Sanjue; Xu, Hui (2013-12-26). "Methylcobalamin: A Potential Vitamin of Pain Killer". Neural Plasticity. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  30. ^ Leem, Jeong Gill (2014-7). "Epidural Steroid Injection: A Need for a New Clinical Practice Guideline". The Korean Journal of Pain. 27 (3): 197–199. doi:10.3344/kjp.2014.27.3.197. ISSN 2005-9159. PMC 4099231. PMID 25031804. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ King, Wade; Miller, David C.; Smith, Clark C.; Committee, on behalf of the Spine Intervention Society’s Patient Safety (2018-02-01). "Systemic Effects of Epidural Corticosteroid Injection". Pain Medicine. 19 (2): 404–405. doi:10.1093/pm/pnx173. ISSN 1526-2375.
  32. ^ a b Comer, Christine M.; Redmond, Anthony C.; Bird, Howard A.; Conaghan, Philip G. (2009-10-01). "Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists". BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 10 (1): 121. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-121. ISSN 1471-2474. PMC 2762954. PMID 19796387.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  33. ^ Ammendolia, Carlo; Côté, Pierre; Southerst, Danielle; Schneider, Michael; Budgell, Brian; Bombardier, Claire; Hawker, Gillian; Rampersaud, Y. Raja (12 2018). "Comprehensive Nonsurgical Treatment Versus Self-directed Care to Improve Walking Ability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial". Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 99 (12): 2408–2419.e2. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.014. ISSN 1532-821X. PMID 29935152. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  34. ^ "Neel Anand, MD - Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Director of Spine Trauma". SpineUniverse. Retrieved 2020-11-14.
  35. ^ Bydon, Mohamad; Macki, Mohamed; Abt, Nicholas B.; Sciubba, Daniel M.; Wolinsky, Jean-Paul; Witham, Timothy F.; Gokaslan, Ziya L.; Bydon, Ali (2015-05-07). "Clinical and surgical outcomes after lumbar laminectomy: An analysis of 500 patients". Surgical Neurology International. 6 (Suppl 4): S190–S193. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.156578. ISSN 2229-5097. PMC 4431053. PMID 26005583.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  36. ^ El Tabl, Mohamed A.; El Sisi, Yasser B.; Al Emam, Saeed E.; Hussen, Mohamed A.; Saif, Dalia S. (2020-07-13). "Evaluating the outcome of classic laminectomy surgery alone versus laminectomy with fixation surgery in patients with lumbar canal stenosis regarding improvement of pain and function". Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery. 35 (1): 19. doi:10.1186/s41984-020-00087-6. ISSN 2520-8225.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  37. ^ Machado, Gustavo C.; Ferreira, Paulo H.; Harris, Ian A.; Pinheiro, Marina B.; Koes, Bart W.; van Tulder, Maurits; Rzewuska, Magdalena; Maher, Chris G.; Ferreira, Manuela L. (2015-03-30). "Effectiveness of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". PLoS ONE. 10 (3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122800. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4378944. PMID 25822730.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  38. ^ Anderson, David B.; Ferreira, Manuela L.; Harris, Ian A.; Davis, Gavin A.; Stanford, Ralph; Beard, David; Li, Qiang; Jan, Stephen; Mobbs, Ralph J.; Maher, Christopher G.; Yong, Renata (2019-02-01). "SUcceSS, SUrgery for Spinal Stenosis: protocol of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial". BMJ Open. 9 (2): e024944. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024944. ISSN 2044-6055. PMID 30765407.
  39. ^ Wise, Jacqui (2015-04-07). "Physical therapy is as effective as surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, study finds". BMJ. 350. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1827. ISSN 1756-1833. PMID 25852064.
  40. ^ a b Haddadi, Kaveh; Asadian, Leila; Isazade, Ahdie (2016-01-01). "Effects of Nasal Calcitonin vs. Oral Gabapentin on Pain and Symptoms of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Clinical Trial Study". Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders. 9: CMAMD.S39938. doi:10.4137/CMAMD.S39938. ISSN 1179-5441. PMC 4934406. PMID 27398032.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  41. ^ a b Webb, Michael P; Helander, Erik M; Menard, Bethany L; Urman, Richard D; Kaye, Alan D (2018-02-21). "Tanezumab: a selective humanized mAb for chronic lower back pain". Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 14: 361–367. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S144125. ISSN 1176-6336. PMC 5825994. PMID 29503555.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  42. ^ Nair, Abhijit S (2018). "Tanezumab: Finally a Monoclonal Antibody for Pain Relief". Indian Journal of Palliative Care. 24 (3): 384–385. doi:10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_208_17. ISSN 0973-1075. PMC 6069623. PMID 30111960.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  43. ^ Patel, Mona K.; Kaye, Alan D.; Urman, Richard D. (2018-01-01). "Tanezumab: Therapy targeting nerve growth factor in pain pathogenesis". Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 34 (1): 111. doi:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_389_15. ISSN 0970-9185. PMID 29643634.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)