Alexander Ross Clarke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with Alex Clark or Alex Clarke.
Alexander Ross Clarke
Alexander Ross Clarke.jpg
Alexander Ross Clarke in 1861
Born (1828-12-16)16 December 1828
Reading, England
Died 11 February 1914(1914-02-11) (aged 85)
Reigate, Surrey
Nationality British
Fields Geodesy
Institutions Ordnance Survey
Known for The Principle Triangulation of Great Britain, Reference ellipsoids, Textbook on geodesy.
Notable awards Royal Medal of the Royal Society, Companion of the Order of the Bath

Alexander Ross Clarke (1828–1914) was a British geodesist, primarily remembered for his calculation of the Principle Triangulation of Britain (1858), the calculation of the Figure of the Earth (1858, 1866, 1880) and one of the most important text books of Geodesy (1880).

Biographical details[edit]

Sources[edit]

The basic sources of material on Clarke are the two articles by Charles Close in 1925 and 1943. The first was an article for the Royal Engineers Journal (Close 1925) and a second revised and expanded version appeared in the Empire Survey Review.[1](Close 1943) Although Close was almost thirty years younger than Clarke, and joined the Ordnance Survey only after Clarke's retirement, they knew each other well and they collaborated on the article Map for the eleventh edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Much of Close's material is incorporated in the web page REubique[2] (de Santis 2002) along with details of his military career and further information communicated by one of Clarke's living descendants. Other sources of information are to be found in the Times of London[3] and obituaries in several learned societies.[4] Two recent histories of the Ordnance Survey include information on Clarke: Owen and Pilbeam,[5] and Seymour.[6]

Family background and education 1828—1850[edit]

Clarke was born in Reading, Berkshire, England on 16 December 1828. His Scottish father, David Ross Clarke, had travelled to Jamaica as a young merchant and there he married Elizabeth (Eliza) Ann Hall, the daughter of Col. Charles William Hall and Isabella Ann Ford, on 8 March 1827 in Kingston.[7] They came to England for the birth of Alexander but they must have returned to Jamaica very soon afterwards for Alexander would later regale his own children with stories of his childhood experiences in the colony.(Close1925)

The parents, David and Eliza, were back in England in 1834[8] but they soon moved up to David's family home at Eriboll[9] in the far north of Scotland. The school teaching there was primitive but effective. Close (1943) repeats an anecdote told by Alexander's younger brother: "I do not know what schooling he had in those young days, but I remember his telling me of a dominie[10] putting him under his desk and kicking him from time to time, also how taws[11] were used. Anyway he learned Latin and mathematics." Close adds that "The mathematics that was thus kicked into him determined his career in after life."

David Clarke and his family moved to London, before 1846, and eventually settled at 35 Devonshire Place, where he died in 1861. His wife, Eliza Ann, died in 1887. It was from this London address that Alexander Clarke, at the age of seventeen in 1846, applied to the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich as a Gentleman Cadet.[12] Clarke was very unprepared for the entrance examination, having left a space of only three weeks for revision, and he was placed bottom of the list of candidates. At Woolwich he would undergo basic military training and formal teaching in subjects such as mathematics and fortifications(modern civil engineering). Clarke excelled at his studies and he passed out first, with "the reputation of being an exceptionally capable young man" (Close 1943). He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Royal Engineers on 1 October 1847.[13]

After his commissioning, Clarke attended the Young Officers Course at the Royal School of Military Engineering at Chatham and there he would have studied surveying as well as the engineering of fortifications. He was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant on 11 July 1849 at the end of that course.

The Ordnance Survey 1850—1881[edit]

In 1849 during the last months of his time at Chatham Clarke decided to try for the Ordnance Survey and he made an indirect approach to the Superintendent, Colonel Hall, through the good offices of Colonel Reid, his former professor at the Royal Military Academy (Close 1925). Hall had no funds to employ Clarke that year but he recruited him the following year when the government approved funding for the final report on the Principal Triangulation of Great Britain. This was an opportune moment for the Survey had recently lost some of its senior staff and, at the same time, Hall had banished Captain Yolland, the most able member of the Survey, to its remotest office in Enniskillen.[14]

Before Clarke could make progress on the calculation of the triangulation, the War Office intervened and abruptly dispatched him to military service in Canada. The nature of the posting is not recorded but it had one happy outcome. Clarke met, and married,[15] Frances Maria, youngest daughter of Colonel Matthew C. Dixon, his Commanding Officer.

Superintendent Hall retired in 1854 and Yolland, the most competent member of the Survey, was passed over in favour of Colonel Henry James. Yolland resigned immediately and Clarke was the only qualified candidate for the analysis of the triangulation. (James was not a mathematician.) The magnitude of this task is discussed below. It was accomplished in 1858, an exceedingly short period of time. His endeavour was rewarded by his military promotion to 2nd Captain in 1855 and by being appointed head of the Trigonometrical and Levelling Departments of the Survey in 1856.

Clarke worked intensely on a number of major projects (below) during the 27 years to 1881, all of which were described in voluminous reports. Clarke appears to have got on well enough with Superintendent James despite James's habit of having his name well to the forefront on these reports.[16] The total experience of these years was distilled in Clarke's famous textbook, Geodesy.[17]

Clarke's contribution to the Survey greatly enhanced its reputation. He himself was acknowledged as one of greatest geodesists in the world and he was honoured with fellowships at the Royal Society of London (1862) and the Philosophical Society of Cambridge (1871). He was elected a Corresponding Member of the Russian Imperial Academy of Sciences (1868).[18] He was made a Companion of the Most Honourable Order of the Bath (1870).[19] His army promotions were to Captain (1861), Major of Army Rank (1871), Major of Regimental Rank (1872), Lieutenant Colonel (1872) and Colonel (1877). (de Santis 2002).

The Clarke family lived in Southampton from 1854 to 1881, the last twenty years in a fashionable Georgian property at 21, Carlton Crescent.[20] The family was large, four boys, one of whom died young, and nine daughters. During the time of intense activity with the Survey, Clarke preferred to work at home with this large family around him. (Close 1925). The three boys married but only two of the girls found husbands.

Retirement and legacy 1881—1914[edit]

Superintendent James retired in 1875 and he was succeeded by his deputy, Colonel John Cameron. He died suddenly in 1878 and after his death Clarke was made acting head of the Survey until the appointment of Colonel Anthony C. Cooke.[21] Three years later the War Office intervened in his career once again; "an official of a well-known type woke up to the fact that he had been at a home station (i.e. the Survey at Southampton) for twenty-seven years, and he was ordered to go to Mauritius" (Close 1943). Clarke, a man of some-what hasty temper (Close), strongly resented this summary order which involved such a complete break with his life's work and he promptly sent in his resignation from the Army.[22]

Despite protestations to the War Office from the scientific establishment, Clarke's resignation was allowed to stand. "Clarke's retirement was a veritable disaster for the Survey, and his departure lowered the whole tone and scientific status of the department for many a long year." (Close 1925).

From 1881 Clarke's involvement with geodesy becomes more and more tenuous. In October 1883 he and Airy were the British delegates at the geodetic conference in Rome, and in 1884 he represented Britain at the International Geodetic Conference. Thereafter he published no further work on the subject apart from the major article with Helmert for the Encyclopaedia Britannica.[23] His fame was not diminished in any way he was also made an honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (1892) and the Royal Astronomical Society (date ?). His most prestigious award was the Royal Medal of the Royal Society of London awarded in 1887.[24] The text of the citation is as follows:

"The medal which, in accordance with the usual rule has been devoted to mathematics and physics, has this year been awarded to Colonel A. Clarke for his comparison of standards of length, and determination of the figure of the earth. Col. Clarke was for some 25 years the scientific and mathematical adviser for the Ordnance Survey, and while acting in that capacity he became known to the whole scientific world as possessing unique knowledge and power in dealing with the complex questions which arise in the science of geodesy. His laborious comparison of the standards of length, carried out under General Sir Henry James, R.E., are universally regarded as models of scientific precision. His determination of the ellipticity and dimensions of the earth from the great arcs of meridian and longitude involved a very high mathematical ability and an enormous amount of labour. The conclusion at which he arrived removed an apparent discrepancy between the results of pendulum experiments and those derived from geodesy, and is generally accepted as the best approximation hitherto attained as to the figure of the earth."

On retirement Clarke moved to Reigate, Surrey[25] Clarke still had many of his children at home and with only his army pension he was in straitened circumstances and, from 1888, without the companionship of his wife. He resigned his fellowship of the Royal Society for financial reasons but in 1888 he was honoured by re-admission without fees. His son recounts that he even sold his Royal Medal, for forty pounds, but gave half away to charity.[26] Although Clarke disengaged from the study of geodesy he was clearly mentally active until a very good age. The accounts by Close mention microscopy, the four colour problem, music and, above all, religion.

Alexander Ross Clarke died on 11 February 1914 in Reigate. There is a brief obituary in the Times (1914) but Royal Society obituary and the Nature obituary are more comprehensive. For many years he was the most prominent geodesist in the British firmament.[27]

The major geodetic contributions[edit]

Principal Triangulation, 1858[edit]

The Principal Triangulation of Great Britain and Ireland[28] was started by General Roy in 1784 but it was only completed in 1850, just as Clarke was joining the Survey. The methods of analysis had been planned in outline by Yolland, his predecessor at the head of the Trigonometric Section, but it fell to Clarke to finalize the methods and carry them through to completion. This he achieved in the four years from 1854 to publication in 1858. The basic data was the collection of angle bearings taken from each of the 289 stations towards a number of other stations, typically from three to ten in number. The multiple observations were first subjected to a least squares error analysis to extract the most likely angles and then the triangles formed by the corrected bearings were adjusted simultaneously, again by least squares methods, to find the most likely geometry for the whole mesh. This was an immense undertaking which involved the solution of 920 equations without the aid of matrix methods or digital computers.[29] The only available computers were the living personnel of the Trigonometric Section. Once the triangles had been fixed it was then possible to calculate all the sides of the mesh in terms of the length of either of the bases, one by Lough Foyle in Ireland and the other on Salisbury plain. The accuracy of the survey was such that when the length of the Lough Foyle base was calculated through the triangulation mesh from the Salisbury base the error was only 5 inches when compared with its measured length. The final step was to use the distances and angles to work out the latitude and longitude of each triangulation point on the Airy ellipsoid.

The natural course of events after a primary triangulation is to construct a secondary triangulation with sides of a few miles and then a tertiary triangulation at a parish level showing all significant details. This did not happen because the infilling had been ongoing for fifty years of topographic surveying and maps were already published on a county basis, each with an origin which was sometimes connected to the primary triangulation and sometimes not. As a result the county maps were only loosely tied to the principal triangulation and no attempt was made to revise them.

Figure of the Earth, 1858[edit]

The calculated latitudes and longitudes of the triangulation on the [Reference ellipsoid|Airy ellipsoid] for which the semi-major axis (a) and inverse flattening (c=1/f with f=1-b/a) are

  • a=20923713 ft.,     c=280.4.   (Airy 1830)

In the penultimate section of the Principal Triangulation Clarke compares the calculated latitudes with the actual observed values and adjusts the above parameters so that the differences are minimized in a least squares fit. The result was

  • a=20927005 ft.,     c=299.33.   (Best fitting ellipsoid for GB, 1858)

These values were of academic value only since Britain continued to define latitude and longitude on the Airy ellipsoid or, after 1936, a slightly [Retriangulation of Great Britain|modified] version. In the final section Clarke combined the British data with that for the meridian arcs of France, Russia, India, Prussia, Peru, Hanover and Denmark. The result was

  • a=20923713 ft.,     c=280.4.   (Clarke 1858.)

Tri-axial Figure of the Earth, 1860[edit]

In Clarke (1861) he notes that General T. F. de Schubert had published a paper in which he claimed that the meridian arc data established that the equator of the Earth was elliptical in form. Clarke analyzed a larger data set and claimed that it fitted a tri-axial ellipsoid with a polar semi axis (b) and inverse flattenings of

  • b=20853768 ft.,     c=286.8  at 13°58'.5 E    c=309.4  at 103°58'.5 E,

for which the difference in equatoreal semi-axes is approximately one mile. Clarke estimated the errors of the results and he found that the error in longitudes might be as much as 20° and he maintained that the data wasn't accurate enough to warrant any precise claims.

Levelling of Britain, 1861[edit]

In addition to the determination of the precise location of the trigonometric points the Survey established the precise altitude of a number of fundamental benchmarks by spirit levelling. This height survey was completely independent of the position survey: this is in contrast to modern GPS fixes which give both. The report of the levelling in Ireland had been published in 1855 and it fell to Clarke to prepare the reports for England and Scotland. For England this involved a least squares analysis for the 62 lines of primary levelling with 91 fundamental benchmarks at the end points and at points of intersection. The reference level was the height of Mean Water at Liverpool. 32 end points were connected to tidal stations and therefore the variation of mean water around the country was fixed. The benchmarking proceeded along the roads but side lines were taken to and over many of the mountain top trig points from which other trig point altitudes were measured by trigonometric levelling. The reports were published in 1861. Unlike the Principal Triangulation report no theory was included in Clarke's levelling reports.[30]

International connections: the longitudinal arc at 52°N[edit]

In James (1863) there is a discussion of the European cooperation proposed by Otto Struve, namely that the Triangulations of Russia, Prussia, Belgium, France and Britain be connected so that arc along the parallel at 52°N could be measured. This large arc, of 75° of longitude, would provide a very valuable constraint on all attempts to calculate the figure of the Earth. The Ordnance Survey had completed a cross-channel survey over 50 years previously and, as part of the Principal Triangulation in 1858, had measured the distance from Valentia Island (51°28'N, 10°20'W) to Greenwich (51°55'N). The accuracy of of the cross-channel survey was very poor compared to the standards of 1860 and there were also doubts about the Triangulation in Valentia so it was decided to repeat both sets of measurements.

The extension to France and Belgium is reported in James (1863) and it provides data for the section of the 52°N arc between Valentia and Mount Kemmel in Belgium. The calculations were carried out by Clarke and he used the data to give a further improvement for the Figure of the Earth. The data also provided much tighter data for the Anglo-French meridional arc. The data for the re-analysis of the triangulation near Valentia is reported in Clarke & James (1867).

The proposed arc was another thirty years in its completion. It is discussed the article on the Figure of the Earth in Britannica (1911a).

Length comparisons and Figure of the Earth 1866[edit]

As soon as the proposal to unite a number of European triangulations had been made it was apparent that such an effort would be of little benefit unless the different length units were compared as accurately as possible. This had already been done for some pairs of standards but a new comparison of all the standards, in one location with uniform conditions, was now required. The results would also have implications on combining arc measurements to determine the Figure of the Earth and for this reason non-European standards were also included. The comparisons were carried out under Clarke's supervision in a special building constructed at Survey headquarters in Southampton and he presented the results in two reports. Clarke & James (1866a) compares versions of the standard foot (used in surveys of Britain, India and Australia), versions of the toise (from Russia, Belgium and France), the French metre and the British copy; in each case one of the yard standards being taken as the basic unit. Clarke & James (1872) extended the comparisons to a second Russian toise, the Austrian klafter (and two of its copies), and Spanish and American copies of the metre. Clarke found that nominally identical standards differed by small amounts measurable in millionths of a yard (or thousandths of a millimetre).[31][32]

Clarke & James (1866a) includes an appendix in which Clarke considers the Figure of the Earth once again. He finds:

  • a=20926062 ft.,      c=294.98,   (Clarke 1866)
  • a=6378206.4 m.,    c=294.98,   (Clarke 1866)

The conversion is 1 metre = 3.280869367 feet (as given in the 1866 paper). This ellisoid is of some importance because it was that adopted for the USGS surveys of the 1880s. It is relevant today since many US topographic maps are based on Clarke's 1866 ellipsoid, moreover many US legal documents include boundary definitions in terms of latitude and longitude values defined on the same.

Text book Geodesy[edit]

Geodesy (Clarke 1880) was the first major survey of the subject since the work of Airy. It was well reveived throughout Europe and it was translated into a number of Languages. There are 14 chapters. Geodetical Operations — Spherical Trigonometry — Least Squares — Theory of the Figure of the Earth — Distances, Azimuths and Triangles on the Spheroid — Geodetic Lines — Measurement of Base Lines — Instruments and observing — Calculation of Triangulation — Calculation of Latitudes and Longitudes — Heights of Stations — Connection of Geodetic and Astronomical Operations — Figure of the Earth — Pendulums.

The penultimate chapter includes yet another set of values for the Figure of the Earth. This ellipsoid is referred to as Clarke 1880 and it is used many African countries..

Other articles and encyclopaedia contributions[edit]

pending

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ The Empire Survey Review changed its name to Survey Review in 1963.
  2. ^ The motto of the Royal Engineers is Ubique or everywhere.
  3. ^ See (Times 1853), (Times 1870), (Times 1887), (Times 1914). Note that the digital archive is freely accessible in most libraries in Britain and America.
  4. ^ The Royal Society obituary and the Nature obituary are most comprehensive.
  5. ^ (Owen & Pilbeam 1992) page 55 (true) or 64 (pdf)
  6. ^ (Seymour 1980) pp. 139—146 (true) or pp. 153—160 (pdf).
  7. ^ Information on Clarke's parents is taken from a Turnbull family website. The relevant pages are found under the entries for Clarke and a document relating to the Hall family.
  8. ^ The Clarke Family Bible shows that David Clarke's eldest daughter was born at Canterbury in 1834 (Close 1943)
  9. ^ David Clarke was born on 28 February 1800 at Keddale in the parish of Durness. Record At some later date the family moved to Eriboll in the same parish.
  10. ^ Dominie is an old Scottish term for teacher.
  11. ^ The tawse was the standard implement of school punishment in Scotland.
  12. ^ For an account of Gentleman Cadets see the The History of RMA Sandhurst.
  13. ^ For more on the Royal Military Academy at Woolwich see the RE website which includes a page for the class of 1847
  14. ^ For an account of the disastrous relationship between Hall and Yolland see (Owen & Pilbeam 1992) pp. 44—46 (52—54 in pdf)
  15. ^ The wedding took place in Montreal on 1 November 1853: see (Times 1853) or PDF transcription
  16. ^ For a review of Hall's tenure at the Survey see (Owen & Pilbeam 1992) p53 (p62 in pdf).
  17. ^ See (Clarke 1880). Close (1925) claims that Clarke invented the term Geodesy. This is untrue for the OED claims that the word is first found with its modern meaning in the writing of John Dee,1570.
  18. ^ Clarke had cooperated closely with Struve on geodetic matters.
  19. ^ Order of the Bath reported in (Times 1870)
  20. ^ See the article by (Leonard 2010) and also note the listing at English Heritage.
  21. ^ See the list of Directors-General
  22. ^ Clarke's friend and fellow RE, Colonel George Gordon, later General Gordon, tried to persuade to withdraw his resignation. Clarke refused to withdraw his papers and Gordon himself took the posting to Mauritius. (Close 1943)
  23. ^ See (Encyclopaedia Britannica 1911a).
  24. ^ Royal medal citation: Times (1887).
  25. ^ The address given in the ODNB is Strathmore, West Street, Reigate.
  26. ^ Comment of one of Clarke's sons in (Close 1943).
  27. ^ See the reports of the British Association for the Advancement of Science at the 1925 Southampton meeting in Times (1925a) and Times (1925b).
  28. ^ The original report is Clarke & James (1858b) but the triangulation is discussed in the books of Hewitt (2010), Owen & Pilbeam (1992), and Seymour (1980).
  29. ^ The calculations were simplified by splitting the mesh into 21 small sub-meshes.
  30. ^ See James (1902) and Close (1910) for discussions of levelling.
  31. ^ Length Comparisons Clarke & James (1866a), page 280.
  32. ^ Length Comparisons Clarke & James (1872), page 495.

Bibliography[edit]

General[edit]


Biographical[edit]

Ordnance Survey publications[edit]

The following list contains the major reports prepared by Clarke, as well as his text book. The title pages of many of the reports mention only Colonel Henry James, Superintendent of the Ordnance Survey, but in every case it is made clear that Clarke was de facto author.

Other scientific papers[edit]

pending

Encyclopaedia articles[edit]

External links[edit]

Fighting the empty section BOT