Betteridge's law of headlines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Betteridges Law of Headlines)
Jump to: navigation, search

Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." It is named after Ian Betteridge, a British technology journalist,[1] although the general concept is much older.[2] The observation has also been called "Davis' law"[3][4] or just the "journalistic principle".[5]

Betteridge explained the concept in a February 2009 article, regarding a TechCrunch article with the headline "Did Last.fm Just Hand Over User Listening Data To the RIAA?":

This story is a great demonstration of my maxim that any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word "no". The reason why journalists use that style of headline is that they know the story is probably bullshit, and don’t actually have the sources and facts to back it up, but still want to run it.[6]

Five years before Betteridge's article, a similar observation was made by UK journalist Andrew Marr in his 2004 book My Trade. It was among Marr's suggestions for how a reader should approach a newspaper if they really wish to know what is going on:

If the headline asks a question, try answering 'no'. Is This the True Face of Britain's Young? (Sensible reader: No.) Have We Found the Cure for AIDS? (No; or you wouldn't have put the question mark in.) Does This Map Provide the Key for Peace? (Probably not.) A headline with a question mark at the end means, in the vast majority of cases, that the story is tendentious or over-sold. It is often a scare story, or an attempt to elevate some run-of-the-mill piece of reporting into a national controversy and, preferably, a national panic. To a busy journalist hunting for real information a question mark means 'don't bother reading this bit'.[7]

Betteridge has admitted violating his own law (writing a question headline with the answer "yes") in an article titled "Does the Mac App Store let you use software for commercial use?" published at his own site.[8]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Macalope, The (2012-08-11). "The Macalope Weekly: Pointless Exercises". Macworld. Retrieved 2012-11-08. 
  2. ^ Posted by meatrobot (2007-12-04). ""It's an old truism among journalists ..." 2007". Meatrobot.org.uk. Retrieved 2012-11-08. 
  3. ^ "List of variants of Murphy's Law". Retrieved 2012-11-08. 
  4. ^ Liberman, Mark (2006-09-17). "Language Log: Davis Law". Itre.cis.upenn.edu. Retrieved 2012-11-08. 
  5. ^ "Murphy's Laws: Journalistic Principle". Murphyslaws.net. Retrieved 2012-11-08. 
  6. ^ Ian Betteridge (23 February 2009). "TechCrunch: Irresponsible journalism". Technovia.co.uk. Retrieved 27 June 2011. 
  7. ^ Marr, Andrew (2004). My Trade: a short history of British journalism. London: Macmillan. p. 253. ISBN 1-4050-0536-X. 
  8. ^ Ian Betteridge (13 January 2011). "In which I violate my own law of headlines". Technovia.co.uk. Retrieved 27 June 2011. 

External links[edit]