Technophobia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is missing citations or needs footnotes. Please help add inline citations to guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (June 2009)

Technophobia is the fear or dislike of advanced technology or complex devices, especially computers.^[1] The term is generally used in the sense of an irrational fear, but others contend fears are justified. It is the opposite of technophilia. First receiving widespread notice during the Industrial Revolution, technophobia has been observed to affect various societies and communities throughout the world. This has caused some groups to take stances against some modern technological developments in order to preserve their ideologies. In some of these cases, the new technologies conflict with established beliefs, such as personal values in simplicity and modest lifestyles. A number of examples of technophobic ideas can be found in multiple forms of art, ranging from literary works such as Frankenstein to classic films like "Metropolis". Many of these works portray the darker side of technology as seen by the technophobic. As technologies become increasingly complex and difficult to understand, people are more likely to harbor anxieties relating to their use of modern technologies.

[edit] Prevalence

A study published in the journal Computers in human behavior was conducted between 1992 and 1994 surveying first-year college students across various countries^[2]. The overall percentage of the 3,392^[3] students who responded with high-level technophobic fears was 29%^[3]. In comparison, Japan had 58% high-level technophobes, India had 82%, and Mexico had 53%^[3].

A published report in 2000 stated that roughly 85 to 90 percent of new employees at an organization may be uncomfortable with new technology, and are technophobic to some degree.^[4]

It is widely thought that this form of phobia is non-existent and is a state of mind.

[edit] History

Technophobia began to gain national and international attention as a movement with the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. With the development of new machines able to do the work of skilled craftsmen using unskilled, underpaid women and children, those who worked a trade began to fear for their livelihoods. In 1675, a group of weavers destroyed machines that replaced their jobs. By 1727, the destruction had become so prevalent Parliament made the demolition of machines a capital offense. This action, however, did not stop the tide of violence. The Luddites, a group of anti-technology workers, united under the name “Ludd” in March 1811, removing key components from knitting frames, raiding houses for supplies, and petitioning for trade rights while threatening greater violence. Poor harvests and food riots lent aid to their cause by creating a restless and agitated population for them to draw supporters from.^[5]

The 19th Century was also the beginning of modern science, with the work of Louis Pasteur, Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel, Michael Faraday, Henri Becquerel, and Marie Curie, and inventors such as Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison and Alexander Graham Bell. The world of the Nineteenth Century was changing rapidly, too rapidly for many, who feared the changes taking place and longed for a simpler time. The Romantic movement exemplified these feelings. Romantics tended to believe in imagination over reason, the “organic” over the mechanical, and a longing for a simpler time. Poets like William Wordsworth and William Blake believed that the technological changes that were taking place as a part of the industrial revolution were polluting their cherished view of nature as being perfect and pure.^[6]

After World War II, a fear of technology continued to grow, catalyzed by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. With nuclear proliferation and the Cold War, people began to wonder what would become of the world now that humanity had the power to destroy it. In the post-WWII era, environmentalism also took off as a movement. The first international air pollution conference was held in 1955, and in the 1960s, investigations into the lead content of gasoline sparked outrage among environmentalists. In the 1980s, the depletion of the ozone layer and the threat of global warming began to be taken more seriously.^[7]

[edit] Technophobic groups

Several societal groups may be considered technophobic, most recognizable are the Amish and the Luddites. Many technophobic groups revolt against modern technology because of their beliefs that these technologies are threatening to their ways of life and livelihoods.^[8] The Luddites were a social movement of British artisans in the 19th century who organized in opposition to technological advances in the textile industry.^[5] These advances would have replaced many skilled textile artisans with comparatively unskilled machinists. The Amish considered technophobic because of their aversion to many modern technologies. Amish focus on maintaining their social order that emphasizes community, simplicity, and religion.^[9] Their leadership weighs heavily the social impact new technologies can have on traditions of social independence from external political and economic power structures.

There are several similarities between the Amish and Old Order Mennonites. The Mennonites share in their focus on community, simplicity, and religion, only to different degrees. The Old Order Mennonites are a separated fraction from the Lancaster Conference. These Old Order Mennonites have religious sanctions against many “modern technologies”, yet allow for some items, such as farm equipment and some simple vehicles.^[10]

[edit] Technophobia in arts

An early example of technophobia in fiction and popular culture is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. It has been a staple of science fiction ever since, exemplified by movies like Fritz Lang's "Metropolis", which offer an example of how technophobia can occur, and Charlie Chaplin's "Modern Times", in which people are reduced to nothing but cogs in the machinery, a product of new industrial techniques like the assembly line. This persisted through the 1950s, with the fears of nuclear weapons and radiation leading to giant insects of monster movies, as well as cautionary tales like "The Day the Earth Stood Still", and into the 1960s, with the likes of The Hulk. It was joined by fears of superintelligent machines, and rebellion against them, which was a recurring theme of Star Trek, from the original series to "ST:NG" to "Voyager" in the 1990s.

Also in the 1960s, the film Omega Man (loosely based on the Richard Matheson novel I am Legend) showed a world scarred by biological warfare and only a handful of humans and a cult of mutants remain alive. Charlton Heston's character is a scientist who is being targeted by the mutants who wish to destroy all science and machinery due to their technophobic beliefs. Technophobia is also thematic in Walter M. Miller's novel A Canticle for Leibowitz, where nuclear war produces an attempt to stamp out science itself as held to be responsible.

In the 1970s, "The Forbin Project" and "Demon Seed" also offered samples of domination by computers. Also in the 1970s, Rich Buckler created Deathlok, a cyborg revivified by a madman as a slave killing machine, a dark twist on Frankenstein.

Technophobia achieved commercial success in the 1980s with the movie The Terminator, in which a computer becomes self-aware, and decides to kill all humans. Blade Runner shows us how human replicas were able to live on Earth, portraying technology gone wrong in "replicants" unhappy with their man-made limitations which demand they be "modified". "Star Trek: Voyager" introduced another twist, when "surplus" EMHs, such sophisticated expert systems as to be almost indistinguishable from human, being effectively reduced to slavery, while other similar systems were turned into sentient prey.

More recently there have been movies like I, Robot, The Matrix Trilogy, and the Terminator sequels. Shows such as Doctor Who - most specifically in the episode Robots of Death - have also tackled the issue of technophobia, with a character in Robots of Death displaying a great fear of robots due to their lack of body language, described by the Fourth Doctor as giving them the appearance of 'dead men walking'. Series consultant Kit Pedler also used this fear as a basis for the inspiration of classic Doctor Who monsters the Cybermen, with the creatures being inspired by his own fear of artificial limbs becoming so common that it would become impossible to know when someone had stopped being a man and become simply a machine. Virtuosity speaks of a virtual serial killer who manages to escape to the real world. He goes on a rampage before he is inevitably stopped. This is a true technophobic movie in that its main plot is about technology gone wrong. It introduces a killer who blatantly destroys people.^[11]

Godfrey Reggio's Qatsi trilogy also deals heavily with issues of technophobia. The idea of keeping the "thinkers" and "workers" separate shows us that even the people who embraced technology feared the potential of it in some way.

[edit] See also

• Chemophobia
• Dystopia
• "Darwin among the Machines," Erewhon, and Samuel Butler
• Minimalism in Philosophy
• Phobia
• Technophilia
• The Wiktionary definition of technophobia

[edit] References

• "Genetically Engineered Crops." The Center for Food Safety. 20 July 2008 <http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/geneticall2.cfm>.
• "Green Our Vaccines Rally." Talk About Curing Autism. 20 July 2008 <http://www.talkaboutcuringautism.org/jenny/dc-rally/green-our-vaccines-rally-recap.htm>.
• Brosnan, M. (1998) Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. Routledge.
• Dan Dinello Technophobia: Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology
• Binfield, Kevin. "Luddites and Luddism." Johns Hopkins University. 20 July 2008 <http://campus.murraystate.edu/academic/faculty/kevin.binfield/luddites/LudditeHistory.htm>.
• Brians, Paul. "Romanticism." 11 Mar. 1998. Washington State University. 20 July 2008 <http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/hum_303/romanticism.html>.
• "Environmental History Timeline." 20 July 2008 <http://www.runet.edu/~wkovarik/envhist/>.

• "TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS." State Dept. United States Government. 20 July 2008 <http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/npt1.html>.

[edit] External links