Tsa Yig
The Cha Yig (Tibetan: བཅའ་ཡིག་, Wylie: bca' yig) is any monastic constitution[1] or code of moral discipline based on codified Tibetan Buddhist precepts.[2][3] Every Tibetan monastery and convent had its own Cha Yig,[4] and the variation in Cha Yig content shows a degree of autonomy and internal democracy.[5]
In Bhutan, the Cha Yig Chenmo (Dzongkha: བཅའ་ཡིག་ཆེན་མོ་; Wylie: bca' yig chen-mo; "constitution, code of law"[6]) refers to the legal code enacted by founder Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal around 1629.[7] Before the Shabdrung enacted the Cha Yig as the national legal code, he had established the code as the law of Ralung and Cheri Monasteries by 1620.[8] The code described the spiritual and civil regime and provided laws for government administration and for social and moral conduct. The duties and virtues inherent in the Buddhist religious law (dharma) played a large role in the legal code, which remained in force until the 1960s.[9]
Monastic constitutions
The Cha Yig, as monastic constitutions or ordinances, emphasize institutional organization and the liturgical calendar. Considered a special type of Buddhist literature, these codes have a close connection with, but are separate from, the general vinaya rules on individual morality and conduct.[10] While they shared some common elements of basic structure, individual Cha Yig codes vary considerably in scope and content, such that no one could be called typical.[1] These variations indicate a measure of monastic autonomy and internal democracy.[5]
For example, one Cha Yig included anti-hunting laws banning hunting outright for monks as well as regulating hunting among laypersons. The Cha Yig for one gelugpa establishment provides, "when itinerant game hunters appear, they should be punished by gathering their weapons in the protector's temple and in addition exhorted once again to observe lawfulness."[11]
The Cha Yig is not limited to mainstream Tibetan Buddhism, but has been implemented in Bön monasteries as well. In 1902, for example, the laws of the Cha Yig were observed written on a broad sheet of pasted daphne paper and posted in a conspicuous position in a Tibetan Bönpo monastery. The Cha Yig stipulated that when an ordained monk was found guilty of violating rules, particularly those regarding chastity, he should be immediately punished and expelled from the monastery. Such punishments were, however, commutable into fines, such as the payment of money to the lama who ordained him, and providing entertainment and presents for the other monastic authorities and the members of the congregation.[12]
Cha Yig in Bhutan
The Cha Yig held a special position in Bhutan as the nation's main legal code from its founding in 1629, through the establishment of the modern Bhutanese monarchy, until de jure abrogation in 1965. During this time, the social and moral code of Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal evolved to a code of regulations for the unified Kingdom of Bhutan. Many basic tenets of the Bhutanese Cha Yig live on in modern legal codes, including its Constitution.
Early Bhutan
The Cha Yig of Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal laid down the dual system of government of Bhutan, a synthesis of spiritual and temporal authority. Central to the system was a spirit of perfect disinterestedness in the trappings of power. The Cha Yig governed the conduct of and relations between the debs (kings), the priesthood, and the raiyats (peasants). The spiritual laws were said to resemble a silken knot known as "Chho-Thrim Dargi Dudphu," easy and light at first but gradually becoming tighter and tighter; the temporal and monarchical laws were said to resemble a golden yoke known as "Gyal-Thrim Sergi Nyashing," growing heavier and heavier by degrees.[13] Both symbols appear on the crest of the modern Royal Court of Justice.[14]
The Cha Yig contained the prohibitions of the "ten impious acts." The prohibitions included homicide, a crime punished by the payment of blood-money. Robbery and theft of church or monastic property was compensable by damages or repayment. The Cha Yig stipulated eightyfold repayment in cases of stealing the king's property, and eightfold repayment in cases of theft among subjects. Adultery was also punishable by fines. Falsehood was punishable by the offender being put to death in a temple, and the invocation of tutelar deities and gods.[13][15]
The Cha Yig also contained affirmative duties called the "sixteen acts of social piety." All were required to regard parents with filial respect and affections, and elders with reverence. All were to receive with gratitude any kind action done by others to themselves. Furthermore, they were to avoid dishonesty and the use of false measures. These were the essence of the "sixteen acts of social piety" of the Cha Yig.[13][15]
Modern Bhutan
In 1907, Ugyen Wangchuck, penlop (governor) of Trongsa, had consolidated power as hereditary monarch of Bhutan and as hereditary holder of the office of the Druk Desi under the dual system of government. Soon after ascension to the throne and office, the king found it necessary to make several modifications to the existing Cha Yig, citing "dangerous laxity" as having "crept into all branches of justice."[13] Lamas were observed violating their oaths and other priestly habits. Meanwhile, government corruption and inadequacy in law enforcement led to a loss of faith among the populace in its governors.
The king therefore instated new rules in the Cha Yig, which he justified in terms of Buddhist precepts. Foremost, the king made laws on the collection of taxes and accountability of collectors to the king, prohibited the combining of raiyat (peasant) holdings, retroactively annulled such prior combinations, and provided for the escheat of the property of lamas upon death or retirement in order to curtail their number and power. Regulations on conduct within dzongs was also refined. Taxation in the form of labor remained an important institution.
King Ugyen Wangchuck's reforms prohibited the sale and purchase of slaves, and limited the use of coolies by state officers to occasions where the health of the officer required such. Otherwise, the institution of slavery was left intact: slaves attempting to escape were to be detained, and anyone who harbored an escaped slave was to "make good the slave."[13] However, if one returned an escaped slave, the owner faced a legal obligation to compensate him for his time and effort.
Those who harbored thieves were to receive the same punishment as the criminals themselves. Anyone who wrongly threatened or attempted to strike another with a sword was made liable for a sword fine. One who committed homicide but did not flee the scene was to be punished by being "bound to the corpse of the deceased whom he has killed," whereas one who fled could be killed wherever and whenever he was caught.[13] The children of a homicide were to be banished from their home, a kind of status crime. Exceptions to the prohibition of homicide were refined to include self-defense, exculpating victims of thieves and robbers who overpowered and killed their attackers. Those who killed notorious thieves or enemies during war were to be rewarded. Government insubordination and corruption, as well as the forging of government letters, was to be punished by blinding or by decapitation.[13]
Funerary and other religious rules pepper King Ugyen Wangchuck's reforms. Also included is a ban on the "most filthy and noxious herb, called tobacco."[13]
Codification and abrogation
The grandson of Ugyen, King Jigme Dorji Wangchuck further reformed the Cha Yig as part of his broader modernization program. He began to open Bhutan to the outside world and took the first steps toward democratization. Upon accession to the throne in 1952, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck put an end to feudalism and slavery and released all remaining serfs.
The Cha Yig was revised in 1957 and ostensibly replaced with a new code in 1965. The 1965 code, however, retained most of the spirit and substance of the 17th century code. Family problems, such as marriage, divorce, and adoption, usually were resolved through recourse to Buddhist or Hindu religious law. In modern Bhutan, village heads often judged minor cases and Dungkhag (district) officials adjudicated major crimes.[16] While Bhutan's criminal codes continue to be built upon the principles of the Cha Yig, Bhutan's Constitution of 2008 effectively abrogates the direct political authority of the lamas, capital punishment, and banishment. The modern Constitution does, however, retain sets of duties and prohibitions in a dichotomy similar to the original Cha Yig.
See also
- Constitution of Bhutan
- Dual system of government
- History of Bhutan
- Judicial system of Bhutan
- Law of Bhutan
- Royal Court of Justice
- Slavery in Bhutan
Notes
- ^ a b Epstein, Lawrence (1990). Reflections on Tibetan Culture: Essays in Memory of Turrell V. Wylie. E. Mellen Press. pp. 205–214. ISBN 0-88946-064-7. Retrieved 15 October 2011.
- ^ Central Asiatic Journal. Vol. 43–44. O. Harrassowitz. 1999. pp. 288–289. Retrieved 15 October 2011.
- ^ Epstein, Lawrence (1990). Reflections on Tibetan Culture: Essays in Memory of Turrell V. Wylie. Studies in Asian Thought and Religion. E. Mellen Press. pp. 205 et seq. ISBN 0-88946-064-7. Retrieved 13 October 2011.
- ^ Gutschow, Kim (2004). Being a Buddhist Nun: the Struggle for Enlightenment in the Himalayas. Harvard University Press. pp. 63, 191. ISBN 0-674-01287-9. Retrieved 16 October 2011.
- ^ a b Samuel, Geoffrey (2005). Revisionings: New Understandings of Tibetan Buddhism and Indian Religion. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 293. ISBN 81-208-2752-X. Retrieved 16 October 2011.
- ^ "Tibetan-English-Dictionary of Buddhist Teaching & Practice". Diamond Way Buddhism Worldwide. Rangjung Yeshe Translations & Publications. 1996. Archived from the original on 28 March 2010. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
- ^ Bowman, John Stewart, ed. (2000). "Chapter XVIII – Bhutan". Columbia Chronologies of Asian History and Culture. Columbia University Press. p. 385. ISBN 0-231-11004-9. Retrieved 25 December 2010.
- ^ Aris, Michael V. (1979). "Life of the Zhabs-Drung – Meditations and Travels". Bhutan – The Early History of a Himalayan Kingdom. Warminster, England: Aris & Phillips Ltd. p. 215. ISBN 0-85668-082-6. Retrieved 3 January 2011.
- ^ Worden, Robert L.; Savada, Andrea Matles (ed.) (1991). "Chapter 6 – Bhutan: Theocratic Government, 1616–1907: Consolidation and Defeat of Tibetan Invasions, 1616–51". Nepal and Bhutan: Country Studies (3rd ed.). Federal Research Division, United States Library of Congress. ISBN 0-8444-0777-1. Retrieved 19 October 2010.
{{cite book}}
:|first2=
has generic name (help) - ^ Smith, Ellis Gene; Schaeffer, Kurtis R. (2001). Among Tibetan Texts: History and Literature of the Himalayan Plateau. Wisdom Publications. p. 156. ISBN 0-86171-179-3. Retrieved 15 October 2011.
- ^ Knight, John (2004). Wildlife in Asia: Cultural Perspectives. Man and Nature in Asia. Vol. 5. Psychology Press. pp. 45–6. ISBN 0-7007-1332-8.
- ^ Das, Sarat Chandra; Rockhill, William Woodville (ed.) (1902). "Chapter VIII – Return to Tashilhunpo and Ugyen-Gyatso's visit to the Bonbo sanctuary of Rigyal Sendar". Journey to Lhasa and Central Tibet. London: Royal Geographical Society of London. p. 208. Retrieved 25 December 2010.
{{cite book}}
:|first2=
has generic name (help) - ^ a b c d e f g h White, J. Claude (1909). "Appendix I – The Laws of Bhutan". Sikhim & Bhutan: Twenty-One Years on the North-East Frontier, 1887–1908. New York: Longmans, Green & Co. pp. 301–10. Retrieved 25 December 2010.
- ^ "The Royal Court of Justice Crest" (PDF). Royal Court of Justice. Retrieved 3 January 2011.
- ^ a b "Introduction to the Bhutanese Legal system". The Royal Court of Justice Online. Royal Court of Justice. Archived from the original on 26 April 2011. Retrieved 10 February 2011.
- ^ Worden, Robert L.; Savada, Andrea Matles (ed.) (1991). "Chapter 6 – Bhutan: Legal System. Criminal Justice". Nepal and Bhutan: Country Studies (3rd ed.). Federal Research Division, United States Library of Congress. ISBN 0-8444-0777-1. Retrieved 19 October 2010.
{{cite book}}
:|first2=
has generic name (help)