|This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2012)|
M13/40 tank at the Base Borden Military Museum, Ontario. The driver's vision hatch is missing from this vehicle.
|Place of origin||Italy|
|In service||8 July 1940 - c. 1943|
|Used by|| Italy
|Wars||World War II|
|Designed||26 October 1939|
|Produced||1 January 1940 - c. 1941|
|Weight||13.5 t (13.3 long tons)|
|Length||4.9 m (16 ft 0.9 in)|
|Width||2.2 m (7 ft 2.6 in)|
|Height||2.39 m (7 ft 10.1 in)|
|Armor||42 mm or 0.2-1.7 inches|
|47 mm Cannone da 47/32 M35
|3-4 x 8 mm Breda machine guns|
|Engine||Fiat V8 diesel SPA 8 TM
|Power/weight||8.92 horsepower per ton|
|Suspension||Leaf spring bogies|
|200 km (120 mi)|
|Speed||32 km/h (20 mph) (road speed)|
The Fiat-Ansaldo M13/40 was an Italian World War II tank designed to replace the Fiat L3, the Fiat L6/40 and the Fiat M11/39 in the Italian Army at the start of World War II. It was the main tank the Italians used throughout the war. The design was influenced by the British Vickers 6-Ton and was based on the modified chassis of the earlier Fiat M11/39. M11/39 production was cut short in order to get the M13/40 into production. The name refers to "M" for Medio (medium) according to the Italian tank weight standards at the time, 13 tonnes was the scheduled weight, and 1940 the initial year of production.
The M13 was constructed of riveted steel plates as follows: 30 mm front (as M11), 42 mm on turret front (30 mm for M11), 25 mm on the sides (M11 had only 15 mm), only 6 mm bottom (that made it very vulnerable to mines) and 15 mm on top. The crew of 4 were housed in a forward fighting compartment, with the engine at the rear and transmission at the front. The driver and machine-gunner/radio operator were in the hull, with the gunner and commander in the turret.
The Vickers-derived running gear had two bogie trucks with eight pairs of small wheels on each side, using leaf-spring suspension. The tracks were conventional skeleton steel plate links, and were relatively narrow. Together, this system was thought to allow good mobility in the mountainous areas in which future combat was expected. In the desert where most M13s were actually employed, mobility was less satisfactory. The tank was powered by a 125 hp (93 kW) diesel engine. This was an innovation that many countries had yet to introduce. Diesel engines were the future for tanks, with lower cost, greater range and reduced danger of fire compared to gasoline-powered engines.
The tank's main armament was a 47 mm gun, a tank mounted version of the successful Cannone da 47/32 M35 anti-tank gun. It could pierce about 45 mm of armor at 500 m (550 yd). This was sufficient to penetrate the British light and cruiser tanks it would face in combat, though not the heavier infantry tanks. One hundred and four rounds of mixed armor-piercing and high explosive ammunition were carried. The M13 was also armed with three or four machine-guns: one coaxially with the main gun and two in the forward, frontal ball mount. A fourth machine gun was sometimes carried in a flexible mount on the turret roof for anti-aircraft use. Two periscopes were available for the gunner and commander, and a radio was also theoretically available as standard equipment.
The M13/40 was used in the Greek campaign in 1940 and 1941 and in the North African Campaign. The M13/40 was not used on the Eastern Front; Italian forces there were equipped only with Fiat L6/40s and Semovente 47/32s. Beginning in 1942, the Italian Army recognized the firepower weakness of the M13/40 series and employed the Semovente 75/18 self-propelled gun alongside the tanks in their armored units.
The first of over 700 M13/40s were delivered following a rate of production of about 60-70 a month, before the fall of 1940. They were sent to North Africa to fight the British; however, most units were hastily formed (and thus lacked cohesion), the tanks had not been fitted with radios (giving them a serious tactical disadvantage even against inferior enemies) and their crews had almost no training (in 1940 the crews were given 25 days of actual tank training and then sent to the front). The baptism of fire came with a special unit, the Babini Brigade. Arriving too late to fight in the September offensive, this unit was ready the next December, for a major British offensive operation. Further action took place in Derna, where the V battalion had just arrived. Tanks of III battalion were also present near this position, at the battle of Bardia. In two days of fighting (January 3–4, 1941), the Australians suffered 456 casualties while the Italians lost 45,000 men captured. On February 6–7, the British offensive penetrated so far that the Babini Brigade sought to open a breach in the British lines at Beda Fomm in an effort to allow cut-off Italian troops to retreat along the Libyan coast. The brigade's action was unsuccessful and all 20 of their tanks were lost. The last six surviving tanks entered a field near the local British command post. They were destroyed one after another by a single 2-pdr (40 mm) anti-tank gun. Many tanks were lost in this campaign to artillery fire rather than other tanks. A number of captured M11 and M13s were re-used by the Australian 2/6th Cavalry Regiment and the 6th Royal Tank Regiment, until the spring of 1941, when their fuel ran out and they were destroyed.
The M13s also fought in Greece, in difficult terrain. Subsequently, in April 1941, M13s of the Ariete division took part in the Siege of Tobruk, with little success against British Matildas. The first successful action for the M13 was the Battle of Bir-el Gobi.
Later use in the desert war
In April 1941, at the time of the arrival of the Afrika Korps, the Italians had around 240 M13 and M14 tanks in first-line service. In 1942, as the Allies began deploying Grants and Crusader IIIs, along with towed 6 pounder anti-tank guns in their infantry units, the weaknesses of the M13 were exposed. In an attempt to improve protection, many crews piled sandbags or extra track links on the outside of their tanks, but this made the already-underpowered vehicles even slower and increased maintenance requirements; such practice, while popular, was discouraged by the commanders for the same reason. The Italians equipped at least one company in each tank battalion with more heavily armed Semovente 75/18 assault guns.
The Second Battle of El Alamein saw the first appearance of the M4 Sherman, while some 230 M13s were still in front line service. In several days of battle, the Ariete and Littorio divisions were used to cover the Axis retreat. The Centauro Division was virtually destroyed fighting in Tunisia. By then, the M13/40 and the M14/41 were completely surpassed, and their armament was all but useless against the enemy's M3 Lee and M4 Sherman medium tanks at all but point-blank range (however, both could easily destroy an M13/40 from a distance); they resorted to firing at the suspensions and the tracks, and to rely on fire support by the Semoventi and artillery.
Strengths and weaknesses
The M13/40 was a conventional light tank of the early war period, similar in capability to other Vickers-derived designs such as the Polish 7TP and Soviet T-26. With a weight of 13 tons, it carried armor comparable to its opponents of 1940-41, its 47mm long barrelled gun was more than a match for the British tanks of 1940-41 which were similarly armoured to the M13 but carried 2pdr (40mm) guns with shorter range and inferior ballistic performance, in the same age most German tanks were armed with 20mm or 37mm guns and the gun/armour race led to adoption of weapons of 50mm calibre only during 1942. The adoption of the 47mm long gun was probably the best feature of the M13. Due to its relatively large calibre the main gun's HE round was also very useful against towed guns and infantry and eliminated or at least mitigated, for the first years of war, the need for a dedicated support vehicle such as the Wehrmacht had in the early mark Panzer IV and Stug III. The diesel engine was an advantage, and the simplicity of production suited the state of Italian industry.
However, the tank also had many grave shortcomings which severely hampered its effectiveness on the battlefield: the engine provided good range, but not great power and reliability. The M13's engine was the same as the M11's, but the newer tank was heavier, which resulted in lower speed and more strain on the powerplant. The suspension and tracks were reliable, but resulted in relatively low speeds, not much better than infantry tanks such as the Matilda. Armament was sufficient for 1940-41 but did not keep up with the increased armor and firepower on Allied or German tanks. The method of construction, using rivets, was outdated. Most tanks of the era were switching to the use of welding for construction, since rivets can shear off when hit, becoming additional projectiles inside the tank. The two-man turret was less efficient in combat than the three-man turrets used in many other tanks of the era. Radios were not fitted to many tanks.
Italian historians Filippo Cappellano and Pier Paolo Battistelli have pointed out that the disappointing performance of the tank early in the war, where its armament was by no means inadequate, can be ascribed to its crews' almost complete lack of training (the first tank training centre would be created only in 1941) and experience, coupled to the lack of tactical doctrine, the lack of radios and the fact that many units were hastily created and sent to the battlefield, and also to the lack of rescue vehicles; they state that, while the training and experience of the Italian crews improved during the conflict, their tanks' technical disadvantage worsened. In such a condition, they express marvel that the Italian tanks were able to fight for as long as they did.
Despite heavy operational attrition, the M13 were present at the war's end and a few even managed to survive into the post-war period. One infantry division named "Lupi di Toscana" still fielded M13 during the late 50s and early 70s, in lieu of armoured cars.
The M13/40 series was Italy's most-produced tank of the war with over 3,000 built, including later variants such as the Fiat M14/41. It was equipped with a more powerful engine as well as better air filters for operations in North Africa. The last version was the M15/42 tank produced in 1943, with a better petrol engine and a longer 47/40 gun. It also had thicker armour than the previous models. The Semovente 75/18 self-propelled gun was built by utilizing the M13/40 or M14/41 chassis.
The Semovente Comando M40 was an M13/40 tank with the turret replaced by a large multi-piece hatch. The hull housed additional radios and other communication equipment.
- "Italy's M13/40, M14/41 Medium Tanks - World War II Vehicles, Tanks, and Airplanes". Wwiivehicles.com. Retrieved 2009-09-27.
- Cappellano and Battistelli, p. 33
- Pignato 2004, Italian Armored Vehicles of World War Two, Squadron Signal Publications, p. 35
- Cappellano and Battistelli, p. 35
- Cappellano and Battistelli, pp. 35-38
- Cappellano and Battistelli, Italian medium tanks, 1939-1945, Oxford : Osprey 2002, ISBN 9781849087759
- Pignato, Nicola Storia dei mezzi corazzati, Fratelli Fabbri editore, 1976, II volume (pag.201)
- Maraziti, Antonio L'Ariete a Bir-El Gobi, Storia militare n.136, jan 2005 (Albertelli edizioni), pag 4.
- Pignato 2004, Italian Armored Vehicles of World War Two, Squadron Signal Publications, p. 35.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to M13/40 tank.|
- M13/40, M14/41 Medium Tanks at wwiivehicles.com
- CARRO M13/40 at comandosupremo.com
- M13/40 at onwar.com