Fodor's lemma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, particularly in set theory, Fodor's lemma states the following:

If κ is a regular, uncountable cardinal, S is a stationary subset of κ, and f:S\rightarrow\kappa is regressive (that is, f(α) < α for any \alpha\in S, \alpha\neq 0) then there is some γ and some stationary S_0\subseteq S such that f(α) = γ for any \alpha\in S_0. In modern parlance, the nonstationary ideal is normal.

[edit] Proof

We can assume that 0\notin S (by removing 0, if necessary). If Fodor's lemma is false, for every α < κ there is some club set Cα such that C_\alpha\cap f^{-1}(\alpha)=\emptyset. Let C = Δα < κCα. The club sets are closed under diagonal intersection, so C is also club and therefore there is some \alpha\in S\cap C. Then \alpha\in C_\beta for each β < α, and so there can be no β < α such that \alpha\in f^{-1}(\beta), so f(\alpha)\geq\alpha, a contradiction.

The lemma was first proved by the Hungarian set theorist, Géza Fodor in 1956. It is sometimes also called "The Pressing Down Lemma".

Fodor's lemma also holds for Thomas Jech's notion of stationary sets as well as for the general notion of stationary set.

[edit] References

  • G. Fodor, Eine Bemerkung zur Theorie der regressiven Funktionen, Acta Sci. Math. Szeged, 17(1956), 139-142.
  • Karel Hrbacek & Thomas Jech, Introduction to Set Theory, 3rd edition, Chapter 11, Section 3.
  • Mark Howard, Applications of Fodor's Lemma to Vaught's Conjecture. Ann. Pure and Appl. Logic 42(1): 1-19 (1989).
  • Simon Thomas, The Automorphism Tower Problem. PostScript file at [1]

This article incorporates material from Fodor's lemma on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages