Jump to content

Religious Liberty Accommodations Act

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from HB 1523)
Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act.
Mississippi Legislature
  • An Act To Create The "protecting Freedom Of Conscience From Government Discrimination Act"; To Provide Certain Protections Regarding A Sincerely Held Religious Belief Or Moral Conviction For Persons, Religious Organizations And Private Associations; To Define A Discriminatory Action For Purposes Of This Act; To Provide That A Person May Assert A Violation Of This Act As A Claim Against The Government; To Provide Certain Remedies; To Require A Person Bringing A Claim Under This Act To Do So Not Later Than Two Years After The Discriminatory Action Was Taken; To Provide Certain Definitions; And For Related Purposes.
CitationH.B. 1523
Passed byMississippi House of Representatives
PassedFebruary 19, 2016
Passed byMississippi State Senate
PassedMarch 30, 2016
Signed byGovernor Phil Bryant
SignedApril 5, 2016
EffectiveJuly 1, 2016; enjoined
First chamber: Mississippi House of Representatives
Introduced bySpeaker Philip Gunn
Related legislation
Mississippi Student Religious Liberties Act of 2013; Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Status: In force

Mississippi House Bill 1523 (H.B. 1523), also called the Religious Liberty Accommodations Act or Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act, is 2016 state legislation passed in direct response to federal rulings in support of same-sex marriage.[1] MS H.B. 1523 provides protections for persons, religious organizations, and private associations who choose to provide or withhold services discriminatorily in accordance to the three "deeply held religious beliefs or moral convictions" which are specifically outlined in the bill.[2] These protected beliefs are 1) that marriage is and should be an exclusively heterosexual union, 2) sex should not occur outside of marriage, and 3) that biologically-assigned sex is objective and immutably linked to gender.[2][3][4][1]

MS H.B. 1523 protects organizations, companies, and individuals that use any of the aforementioned "deeply held religious beliefs or moral convictions" to justify the choice to deny or offer several different types of services. Individual and organizational decisions that are protected under MS H.B. 1523 include—but are not limited to—issuing marriage licenses, granting adoptions, hiring practices (including state employees), healthcare coverage, housing agreements, as well as specific medical services (including sex reassignment surgery or conversion therapy).[3]

After being passed through Mississippi legislature, H.B. 1523 was originally intended to come into effect on July 1, 2016; however, U.S. District Judge Carlton W. Reeves issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law on June 30. Three days before, he had issued a permanent injunction requiring government officials to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples regardless of the officials' religious beliefs.[5] On June 23, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed Reeves' district court decision, holding that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit lacked standing to bring the lawsuit. The Fifth Circuit accordingly lifted the injunctions, allowing the law to go into effect. The Supreme Court declined to hear the case.[6]

Background

[edit]

On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples is unconstitutional. This decision legalized same-sex marriage throughout the U.S. (including in Mississippi) and found that the right to marry is a fundamental right within the U.S. and cannot legally be denied to same-sex couples.[7]

On March 31, 2016, U.S. District Judge Daniel Porter Jordan III issued a preliminary injunction striking down the Mississippi's ban on adoption privilege for same-sex couples which had been in effect since 2000, declaring it unconstitutional.[8][9]

In the aftermath of these federal rulings, House Bill 1523 was introduced. Mississippi legislators created a bill establishing state-specific exemptions to these federal decisions, namely protection for individuals, organizations, and institutions who choose to deny service to LGBT individuals based on religious beliefs. Republican State Senator Jenifer Branning drew a direct connection between Obergefell and H.B. 1523 when she introduced the bill on the Mississippi Senate floor, saying, "this is presenting a solution to the crossroads we find ourselves in today as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges."[10]

Legislative history

[edit]

Representatives Philip Gunn, William Tracy Arnold, C. Scott Bounds, Lester Carpenter, J. Andrew Gipson, William Shirley, Randy Boyd, and Dan Eubanks officially introduced House Bill 1523, titled "Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act".[3]

On February 19, 2016, the Mississippi House of Representatives passed the bill, with 80 ayes, 39 nays, and 3 absent or not voting.[11]

On March 30, 2016, the Mississippi Senate passed an amended bill, with a 32 ayes, 17 nays, and 1 absent or not voting.[12]

On April 1, 2016, the Mississippi House of Representatives passed the bill as amended by the Senate, with 69 ayes, 44 nays, 7 absent or not voting, and 1 voted present.[13]

On April 5, 2016, GovernorPhil Bryant signed the bill. The bill was intended to go into effect on July 1, 2016.[3]

On April 12, 2016, Mississippi state representatives including Rep. Jay Hughes introduced a suspension resolution, titled the Mississippi Economic and Tourism Recovery Act, aimed at repealing HB 1523.[14][15]

On June 27, 2016, U.S. District Judge Carlton W. Reeves entered a permanent injunction blocking HB 1523's provision allowing county clerks to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses.[16]

On June 30, 2016, hours before the law was to come into force, Judge Reeves issued a preliminary injunction blocking the rest of HB 1523.[17][18]

On July 7, 2016, Governor Phil Bryant filed an appeal against Judge Reeves' preliminary injunction.[19]

On July 13, 2016, Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood announced his office would not pursue an appeal of Judge Reeves' ruling.[20]

On June 23, 2017, Judge Reeves' injunction was lifted and the law went into effect.[21]

Response

[edit]

Proponents of H.B. 1523 argue that the bill protects individuals, businesses, and organizations from being discriminated against by the government for enacting their religious beliefs.[22] Another argument of the bill's supporters is that H.B. 1523 is an example of Mississippi enacting exemptions to the federal Obergefell decision through state legislation.[23]

Opponents of H.B. 1523 argue that the bill denies LGBT people of their constitutionally-protected rights. Some claim that this enables individuals, businesses, and organizations to justify discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or sexual activity.[24] In addition to the bill's implications for same-sex couples and LGBT identified individuals, opponents of the bill have expressed concern about the potential discriminatory effects of H.B. 1523 on single parents and single-parent families as well as individuals who have had premarital sex.[25] On April 5, 2016, the Human Rights Campaign lambasted Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant for signing into law H.B. 1523.[26] A week later, 95 Mississippi writers signed a letter opposing H.B. 1523.; the list of signees includes John Grisham, Donna Tartt, W. Ralph Eubanks, Kiese Laymon, and Greg Iles.[27]

The passing of H.B. 1523 has received criticism and sparked backlash from some Mississippi communities, other municipalities and states, and communities all across the globe.

Local Response

[edit]

Several cities within Mississippi have denounced H.B. 1523 and called for its repeal. The Mississippi Economic Council has voiced opposition to H.B. 1523:

"As the State Chamber of Commerce for a state that has proven its hospitable and business-friendly approach, MEC opposes efforts that would intentionally or unintentionally prevent Mississippi businesses from implementing and enforcing non-discrimination policies or that would limit diversity and inclusion impacting their customers and employees. HB 1523 conflicts with this policy."[27]

On April 6, 2016, the Jackson City Council unanimously passed a resolution opposing H.B. 1523. The resolution states that the state's capitol acknowledges that the United States Constitution protects all individuals' rights equally and prohibits governments from preserving religious beliefs over the rights of people. Mayor Tony Yarber released a statement which read: "As a predominantly black city in Mississippi, the Jackson community has endured racism, discrimination and injustice over the years. We are Mississippi's capital city, and as part of our declaration of being the 'Bold New City,' we will not discriminate against any individual because of race, religious beliefs or sexual orientation, nor do we support legislation that allows for such discrimination."[28]

Biloxi, MS also unanimously passed a resolution calling for H.B. 1523's repeal on April 19, 2016. The resolution was originally introduced by Mayor FoFo Gilich.[29]

National response

[edit]
States and municipalities banning publicly funded travel to Mississippi
  Publicly funded travel banned by state government
  Publicly funded travel banned by city and state government
  Publicly funded travel banned by county government
  Publicly funded travel banned by city and county government
  Publicly funded travel banned by city government

After the passing of H.B. 1523, several state and local government have issued bans preventing travel to the state of Mississippi. These travel bans are intended to express these communities' opposition to the bill and its effects on Mississippians, particularly LGBT Mississippians. The backlash is similar to what North Carolina experienced after passing the widely controversial "bathroom bill".[30]

As of December 2, 2016, the states of California,[31] Connecticut,[32] Minnesota,[33] New York,[34] Vermont,[34] and Washington,[35] the District of Columbia,[36][37] the counties of Dane (Wisconsin),[38] Franklin (Ohio),[39] Montgomery (Maryland),[40] and Multnomah (Oregon),[41] and the cities of Baltimore,[42] Berkeley,[43] Cincinnati,[44] Dayton,[45] Honolulu,[46] Long Beach,[47] Los Angeles,[48] Miami Beach,[49] New York City,[50] Oakland,[51] Philadelphia,[36] Portland (Maine),[52] Portland (Oregon),[53] Providence,[54] Salt Lake City,[55] San Francisco,[56] San Jose,[57] Santa Fe,[58] Seattle,[35] Tampa,[36] West Palm Beach,[59] and Wilton Manors[60] have all issued travel bans in response to H.B. 1523, barring government employees from non-essential publicly funded travel to Mississippi.

International response

[edit]

In April 2016, the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office issued a warning to LGBT travelers to North Carolina and Mississippi.[61][62] The Human Rights Campaign responded that it was "both frightening and embarrassing that one of our nation's staunchest allies has warned its citizens of the risks."

On May 12, 2016, the European Union released a statement condemning the Religious Liberty Accommodations Act in Mississippi and the Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act in North Carolina.[63][64]

Challenges to H.B. 1523 in the Courts

[edit]

Several different lawsuits have aimed to derail and overturn H.B. 1523. In June 2016 before H.B. 1523 was scheduled to originally go into effect, two lawsuits in U.S. District Court challenged the constitutionality of the bill: Barber v. Bryant and Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant. The two cases were consolidated for the preliminary injunction proceedings in U.S. District Court.[65]

Barber v. Bryant

[edit]

Barber v. Bryant was brought forward by Mississippi civil rights attorney Robert McDuff and the Mississippi Center for Justice. The plaintiffs of Barber v. Bryant were eleven individual Mississippians and The Joshua Generation Metropolitan Community Church of Hattiesburg, MS.[66] When heard in District Court, the Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant case was consolidated under Barber v. Bryant.

On June 27, 2016, U.S. District Judge Carlton W. Reeves entered a permanent injunction blocking HB 1523's provision allowing county clerks to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses.[67]

On June 30, 2016, hours before the law was to come into force, Judge Reeves issued a preliminary injunction blocking the rest of HB 1523. In a sixty-page opinion finding that the law violates the Equal Protection Clause and the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, Judge Reeves notes HB 1523 singles out Leviticus 18 while ignoring Leviticus's other prohibitions, such as mixing wool and linens. Judge Reeves further compares Governor Bryant's opposition to the Obergefell v. Hodges decision to Governor James P. Coleman's opposition to the Brown v. Board of Education decision.

On July 13, 2016, Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood announced his office would not pursue an appeal of Judge Reeves' ruling. In a statement, Hood said, "... all HB 1523 has done is tarnish Mississippi's image while distracting us from the more pressing issues of decaying roads and bridges, underfunding of public education, the plight of the mentally ill and the need to solve our state's financial mess." Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant has retained the services of a private attorney, Drew Snyder, to continue the appeal in federal court using private funds.

Governor Phil Bryant and John Davis, executive director of the Mississippi Department of Human Services, appealed the District Court Barber v. Bryant decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.[65]

On June 23, 2017, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the Barber v. Bryant plaintiffs lacked standing. An excerpt from Circuit Judge Jerry Edwin Smith's opinion reads: "We do not foreclose the possibility that a future plaintiff may be able to show clear injury-in-fact that satisfies the 'irreducible constitutional minimum of standing,' ... [T]he federal courts must withhold judgment unless and until that plaintiff comes forward. The preliminary injunction is REVERSED, and a judgment of dismissal for want of jurisdiction is RENDERED." The three-judge panel who heard the case (which also included Judge Jennifer Elrod and Judge Catharina Haynes) agreed unanimously.[68] This ruling reversed Judge Reeves' earlier decision in U.S. District Court; thus, H.B. 1523 went into effect.

On behalf of the case's plaintiffs, Robert McDuff appealed the Fifth Circuit decision in Barber v. Bryant to the United States Supreme Court, claiming that the bill violates both the First and Fourteenth Amendments.[69] On January 8, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case without comment.[70][71]

Campaign for Southern Equality (CSE) v. Bryant

[edit]

Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant was a suit filed in federal district court before H.B. 1523 was even drafted, on October 20, 2014. The plaintiffs were the ACLU and several individual Mississippians represented by Roberta A. Kaplan. CSE v. Bryant challenged Mississippi's statutory and constitutional denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples before the 2015 federal Obergefell decision. The hearing was held on November 12, 2014. The marriage ban was found as unconstitutional by Judge Reeves on November 25, 2014. The case was appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.[72] The Fifth Circuit issued a stay of Judge Reeves' order to issue same-sex marriage licenses.[73] When the federal Obergefell decision legalized same-sex marriage, the Fifth Circuit's stay was overturned and marriage licenses were issued for same-sex couples within Mississippi.[74]

After the passage of H.B. 1523, in May 2016, plaintiffs in the CSE v. Bryant case still represented by Roberta Kaplan filed a motion to reopen the lawsuit in opposition to the bill. Specifically, Kaplan's motion argued that provisions in H.B. 1523 that allow circuit clerk and state workers to recuse themselves from performing their duties are in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.[75] For the case's hearing in U.S. District Court it was consolidated with Barber v. Bryant.

On July 21, 2016, Attorney Roberta A. Kaplan filed an affidavit to illuminate the role that the Christian lobby Alliance Defending Freedom played in drafting H.B. 1523.[76]

In September 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the petition for a rehearing en banc submitted by the plaintiffs of Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant.[77]

In October 2017, the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court.[78] In January 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court passed on reviewing the CSE v. Bryant Fifth Circuit decision.[79]

Alford v. Moulder

[edit]

In May 2016, Nykolas Alford, Stephen Thomas, and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against Judy Moulder, a Mississippi state registrar of vital records.[80] Alfred v. Moulder aimed to prevent H.B. 1523 from going into effect, arguing that the bill goes against the federal ruling in favor of same-sex marriage made in the Obergefell decision.[81] On October 17, 2016, the Court stayed Alford v. Moulder pending a decision in Barber v. Bryant from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.[82]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Five things to know about Mississippi's 'Religious Freedom' law that takes effect Friday". The Commercial Appeal. Retrieved 2018-09-16.
  2. ^ a b MS HB 1523, Mississippi State Legislature, 2016.
  3. ^ a b c d Gunn, Philip; Arnold, William Tracy; Bounds, C. Scott; Carpenter, Lester; Gipson, J. Andrew; Shirley, William; Boyd, Randy P.; Eubanks, Dan. House Bill 1523: Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act". Mississippi House of Representatives. State of Mississippi. April 5, 2016. Accessed on April 6, 2016.
  4. ^ Allen, Samantha (2017-11-01). "The Muted Fight Against HB 1523, the Most Anti-LGBT Law in America". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 2018-09-16.
  5. ^ Judge blocks HB 1523 from starting July 1 Archived 2016-07-02 at the Wayback Machine, Cassie Archebelle, WADM, July 1, 2016
  6. ^ "Victory for HB 1523, Governor as U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review". Retrieved 2018-09-16.
  7. ^ Royals, Kate (June 29, 2015). "AG gives clerks OK for same-sex marriage licenses". The Clarion-Ledger.
  8. ^ "Judge Invalidates Mississippi's Same-Sex Adoption Ban, the Last of Its Kind in America". Slate. 31 March 2016.
  9. ^ "Federal judge tosses same-sex adoption ban". Mississippi Today. 31 March 2016.
  10. ^ Kaplan, Sarah. "Mississippi's Senate just approved a sweeping 'religious liberty' bill that critics say is the worst yet for LGBT rights". Washington Post. Retrieved 2018-09-17.
  11. ^ "H. B. No. 1523: House Passed As Amended". Mississippi House of Representatives. State of Mississippi. February 19, 2016.
  12. ^ "H. B. No. 1523: Senate Passed As Amended". Mississippi Senate. State of Mississippi. March 30, 2016.
  13. ^ "H. B. No. 1523: House Passed As Amended". Mississippi House of Representatives. State of Mississippi. April 1, 2016.
  14. ^ Reilly, Katie (April 12, 2016). "Mississippi Lawmakers Act to Repeal Religious Freedom Law". TIME.
  15. ^ "Mississippi Democrats introduce bill to repeal HB 1523". WVIB.com. April 13, 2016.
  16. ^ Geidner, Chris (27 June 2016). "Federal Judge Criticizes Mississippi Marriage Recusal Law, Will Expand Injunction". BuzzFeed News. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  17. ^ Green, Emma (1 July 2016). "Why Mississippi's Law on Religious rights and LGBT Discrimination Got Blocked". The Atlantic. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  18. ^ Tucker, Neely. "U.S. district judge strikes down Mississippi's 'religious freedom' law". Washington Post. Retrieved 2018-09-20.
  19. ^ Bryant, Callie Daniels (2016-07-13). "MS Attorney General Hood Will Not Appeal Federal Ruling on HB 1523 - HottyToddy.com". HottyToddy.com. Retrieved 2018-09-20.
  20. ^ "AG Jim Hood won't appeal HB 1523 ruling". Clarion Ledger. 14 July 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  21. ^ Campbell, Larrison (2017-06-22). "'Religious freedom' law upheld by federal appeals court". Mississippi Today. Retrieved 2018-01-21.
  22. ^ McAdoo, Larry. "In support of Mississippi House Bill 1523". The Clarion Ledger. Retrieved 2018-09-17.
  23. ^ Perkins, Tony. "The Supreme Falsehoods of HB 1523 Opponents". FRC. Retrieved 2018-09-17.
  24. ^ Campaign, Human Rights. "Mississippi's H.B. 1523 to Become the Worst Anti-LGBTQ State Law | Human Rights Campaign". Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original on June 25, 2017. Retrieved 2018-09-19.
  25. ^ Riley-Collins, Jennifer, and Zakiya Summers. "HB 1523 Hits Home." Jackson Advocate, Jun, 2016, pp. 1. ProQuest.
  26. ^ "Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant Signs Law Attacking LGBT People and Families". Archived from the original on 2016-04-08. Retrieved 2016-04-06.
  27. ^ a b "Iles, Grisham, Eubanks, Reed, Smith, Stockett, Laymon, Tartt Among 95 Mississippi Writers Opposing Anti-LGBT Law". Retrieved 2018-09-19.
  28. ^ Wolfe, Anna (April 6, 2016). "Jackson City Council: We do not discriminate". The Clarion-Ledger.
  29. ^ Keeton, Hugh. "Biloxi City Council passes resolution calling for repeal of HB 1523". www.wlox.com. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  30. ^ "N.C. travel-ban count mounts, now at 18 cities". 12 News. April 14, 2016. Archived from the original on April 23, 2016. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
  31. ^ California will no longer pay for state workers to travel to anti-LGBT states
  32. ^ "The Latest: Conservative leader praises Mississippi law". Times Union. April 6, 2016.
  33. ^ "Dayton Issues New Travel Ban Against Mississippi". CBS Local. April 6, 2016.
  34. ^ a b "New York, Vermont ban official travel to Mississippi over LGBT law". NEWS10 ABC-22. April 6, 2016.
  35. ^ a b "Washington state bans official travel to Mississippi". WCSH6.com. April 6, 2016.[permanent dead link]
  36. ^ a b c Villarreal, Yezmin (April 8, 2016). "Ten U.S. Mayors Form Pro-LGBT Coalition". The Advocate.
  37. ^ Korzius, Rachel. "Mayor Bowser Bans City-Funded Travel To Mississippi Archived 2016-04-13 at the Wayback Machine". DCist. April 12, 2016.
  38. ^ Shah, Parth (April 18, 2016). "Madison, Dane County Ban Employee Travel To North Carolina". Wisconsin Public Radio News.
  39. ^ Sewell, Abby (April 26, 2016). "Franklin County commissioners ban employee travel to North Carolina, Mississippi". NBC4i.com.
  40. ^ Riley, John (April 27, 2016). "Montgomery County Council approves resolution to ban travel to anti-LGBT states". Metro Weekly.
  41. ^ "'I'm appalled this is happening': PDX Mayor cancels trip to Mississippi over anti-gay law". KATU. April 6, 2016.
  42. ^ Prudente, Tim (May 10, 2016). "Baltimore mayor bans government travel to N.C., Mississippi over transgender laws". The Baltimore Sun.
  43. ^ Bajko, Matthew (April 28, 2016). "Berkeley adopts 'hate states' travel, contract ban". The Bay Area Reporter.
  44. ^ Coolidge, Sharon (April 11, 2016). "Cincinnati set to ban government travel to N.C., Miss". Cincinnati Enquirer.
  45. ^ Rodzinka, Paul (April 8, 2016). "Dayton Mayor bans travel to NC, Mississippi". WDTN.
  46. ^ Hofschneider, Anita (April 7, 2016). "Honolulu Won't Fund Travel To NC, Miss". Honolulu Civil Beat.
  47. ^ Long Beach council suspends city travel to North Carolina, Mississippi due to anti-LGBT laws
  48. ^ "Los Angeles Bars Worker Travel To North Carolina, Mississippi Over Laws". CBS Sacramento. April 15, 2016.
  49. ^ "Miami Beach mayor sponsors resolution banning North Carolina, Mississippi travel". WPLG Local 10. April 12, 2016. Archived from the original on April 23, 2016. Retrieved April 13, 2016.
  50. ^ "States, cities ban employee travel to Mississippi, N.C." KENS 5. April 7, 2016. Archived from the original on May 11, 2016. Retrieved April 9, 2016.
  51. ^ "Oakland mayor on board with travel bans". Bay Area Reporter. April 7, 2016.
  52. ^ "Portland, Maine, bans travel to Mississippi, North Carolina". Morganton News Herald. April 26, 2016. [permanent dead link]
  53. ^ "Hales cancels Mississippi trip due to anti-gay law; No city travel to Mississippi until the anti-gay law is overturned". KOIN 6 News. April 6, 2016.
  54. ^ McGowan, Dan (April 8, 2016). "Elorza bans employee travel to N.C., Miss. following controversial laws". WPRI 12.
  55. ^ Harrie, Dan (April 12, 2016). "Salt Lake City Mayor Jackie Biskupski bans city travel to states that have passed anti-LGBT laws". The Salt Lake Tribune.
  56. ^ Batey, Eva (April 6, 2016). "Mayor Ed Lee Bans City-Funded Travel To Mississippi After Anti-LGBT Bill Signed By Governor". SFist. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016.
  57. ^ Fernandez, Lisa (May 17, 2016). "San Jose Votes to Ban Government Travel to North Carolina, Mississippi". NBC Bay Area.
  58. ^ "Santa Fe bans most travel to Mississippi, North Carolina over anti-LGBT laws". Santa Fe New Mexican. April 6, 2016.
  59. ^ "West Palm Beach Mayor Jeri Muoio enacts city-funded travel ban to Mississippi". WPTV. April 7, 2016. Archived from the original on April 10, 2016.
  60. ^ Barszewski, Larry (April 8, 2016). "Wilton Manors employees won't be going to North Carolina, Mississippi". Sun Sentinel. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016. Retrieved April 13, 2016.
  61. ^ "UK warns gay travellers about US anti-LGBT laws". BBC News. 21 April 2016.
  62. ^ "Local laws and customs - USA travel advice".
  63. ^ http://eeas.europa.eu/statements-eeas/2016/160512_02_en.htm [bare URL]
  64. ^ "European Union Criticizes Anti-LGBT Laws | Human Rights Campaign". Archived from the original on 2016-05-21. Retrieved 2016-05-17.
  65. ^ a b Dreher, Arielle. "Legal Fight Against HB 1523 Continues". Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  66. ^ "Opening Brief, Barber v. Bryant". In the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Lamba Legal. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  67. ^ Geidner, Chris. "Federal Judge Halts Mississippi Anti-LGBT Law From Going Into Effect". BuzzFeed News. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  68. ^ Dreher, Arielle. "House Bill 1523 Becomes Law after 5th Circuit Overturns Injunction". Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  69. ^ Campbell, Larrison (2017-10-10). "Plaintiffs appeal HB 1523 to U.S. Supreme Court | Mississippi Today". Mississippi Today. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  70. ^ Lee, Anita (2018-01-08). "Supreme Court says 'no' to LGBT supporters appealing Mississippi's 'religious freedom' law". Sun Herald. Retrieved 2018-01-21.
  71. ^ Rubino, Kathryn. "Supreme Court Refuses To Act In The Face Of Extreme Anti-LGBTQ Law". Above the Law. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  72. ^ Staff Reports (2015-01-08). "5th Circuit to hear appeals in Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas marriage rulings". LGBTQ Nation. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  73. ^ King, Guy. "Mississippi Locals Celebrate SCOTUS Decision but Wait for Marriage Licenses". Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  74. ^ Dreher, Arielle. "Mississippi Clerks Issuing Same-Sex Licenses with AG Hood's Approval". Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  75. ^ Geidner, Chris. "Federal Judge Halts Mississippi Anti-LGBT Law From Going Into Effect". BuzzFeed News. No. 30 June 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  76. ^ Neely, Tucker. "Emails show outside group's influence on Mississippi's 'religious freedom' bill". Washington Post. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  77. ^ "CSE v. Bryant III (HB 1523 lawsuit in MS) | Campaign for Southern Equality". Campaign for Southern Equality. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  78. ^ Dreher, Arielle. "Second HB 1523 Petition Filed with U.S. Supreme Court". Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  79. ^ Stohr, Greg (January 8, 2018). "U.S. Supreme Court Leaves Intact Mississippi Law Curbing Gay Rights". Bloomberg L.P.
  80. ^ Downard, Whitney. "SEALED WITH A KISS: Meridian couple faces uncertain future under cloud of HB 1523". Meridian Star. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  81. ^ "Alford v. Moulder". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  82. ^ "ACLU HB1523 Lawsuit | Jackson Free Press | Jackson, MS". www.jacksonfreepress.com. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religious_Liberty_Accommodations_Act&oldid=1247630700"