Magnetic hyperthermia is the name given to an experimental cancer treatment, although it has also been investigated for the treatment of other ailments, such as bacterial infections. It is based on the fact that magnetic nanoparticles, when subjected to an alternating magnetic field, produce heat. As a consequence, if magnetic nanoparticles are put inside a tumor and the whole patient is placed in an alternating magnetic field of well-chosen amplitude and frequency, the tumor temperature would rise. This treatment method has entered phase II trials (in humans) only in Europe, but research is done in several laboratories around the world to test and develop this technique further.
- 1 Generalities and definition
- 2 Influence of nanoparticle size on their domain structure
- 3 Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization reversal of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles
- 4 Models to be used for single-domain nanoparticles
- 5 Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization of magnetic multi-domain nanoparticles
- 6 Models to be used for multi-domain nanoparticles
- 7 Measuring hyperthermia: in vitro experiments
- 8 Materials for magnetic hyperthermia
- 9 Ex vivo experiments
- 10 In vivo experiments
- 11 See also
- 12 References
- 13 External links
Generalities and definition
Many magnetic materials display a magnetic hysteresis when subjected to a magnetic field that alternates direction. The area of this hysteresis loop is dissipated in the environment as thermal energy, and this is the energy used in magnetic hyperthermia. The power dissipated by a magnetic material subjected to an alternating magnetic field is often called the "Specific Absorption Rate" (SAR) in the community of magnetic hyperthermia; it is expressed in W/g of nanoparticles. The SAR of a given material is then simply given by SAR = Af, where A is the area of the hysteresis loop and f the alternation frequency of the magnetic field. A is expressed in J/g and is also called the "specific losses" of the material. Note that this expression for SAR is a definition; the difficulty lies in finding A. Indeed, as is explained in more detail below, A depends on all the properties of the magnetic material in a very complex manner. In the case of magnetic nanoparticles, A depends on their magnetocrystalline anisotropy K, their volume V, the temperature T, the frequency of the magnetic field f, its amplitude Hmax, and on the volumic concentration of the nanoparticles.
Influence of nanoparticle size on their domain structure
The size of nanoparticles influences their magnetic domains. Small enough nanoparticles are composed of a single magnetic domain. Larger particles are composed of multiple domains because this minimizes the magnetostatic energy. At intermediate sizes, they display a magnetic structure called vortex. A rough approximation to determine the size above which a magnetic nanoparticles is not single-domain any more is when its size is above the typical domain wall dimension in the magnetic material, which ranges from a few to a few tens of nanometers. The nature of the domain structure has a profound influence on the hysteresis of the magnetic nanoparticles and, as a consequence, on their hyperthermia properties.
Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization reversal of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles
Reversal by Brownian motion
In hyperthermia application, the nanoparticles are in a fluid, the blood. During in vitro hyperthermia measurements they are generally dispersed in a liquid and form a ferrofluid. They move and rotate randomly in the fluid, a phenomenon called Brownian motion. When a magnetic field is applied to them, magnetic nanoparticles rotate and progressively align with the magnetic field due to the torque generated by the interaction of the magnetic field with the magnetization. This is similar to a compass. The delay between the magnetic field reversal and the one of the magnetization leads to an hysteresis.
Reversal by thermal activation
The magnetization of the nanoparticle can spontaneously change of orientation under the influence of thermal energy, a phenomenon called superparamagnetism. The magnetization oscillate between its two equilibrium positions. The typical time between two orientation changes is given by the Néel relaxation time , where is an attempt time with a value around 10−9–10−10 seconds.
Reversal by the suppression of the anisotropy barrier by a magnetic field
The magnetization of the nanoparticle is also reversed when an applied magnetic field is large enough to suppress the energy barrier between the two equilibrium positions, a phenomenon which is known as the Stoner–Wohlfarth model of magnetization reversal.
Combination of the three mechanisms
In the most general case, the reversal of the magnetization is due to a combination of the three mechanisms described above. For instance, for a single domain nanoparticle is inside a fluid at room temperature and that a sweeping magnetic field is suddenly applied with a direction opposite to the one of the nanoparticle magnetization. The nanoparticle will at the same time i) rotate in the fluid ii) the barrier between the two equilibrium positions of the magnetization will decrease iii) when the energy barrier becomes of the order of the thermal energy, the magnetization will switch (if the nanoparticle is not already align with the magnetic field due to its physical rotation). There is no simple analytical expression describing this reversal and the properties of the hysteresis loop in this very general case but numerical simulations and analytical expressions can be used in some cases.
Models to be used for single-domain nanoparticles
The linear response theory
The linear response theory is only valid when the response of the magnetic material is linear with the applied magnetic field and can be thus written under the form , where is the complex susceptibility of the material. It is thus valid when the applied magnetic field is much smaller than the magnetic field needed to saturate the magnetization of the nanoparticle. It is able to take into account both the reversal by thermal activation and the reversal by Brownian motion.
The linear response theory uses an average relaxation time , given by . The out of phase component of complex susceptibility is then given by . The hysteresis loop is then an ellipse with an area given by .
The Stoner–Wohlfarth model and the maximum area
The Stoner–Wohlfarth model allows one to calculate the hysteresis loop of magnetic nanoparticles at T=0 with the assumption that the nanoparticles are fixed in the magnetic field (the Brownian motion is neglected) and magnetically independent. Its main interest is to predict the maximum hysteresis area for independent nanoparticles with given properties. Indeed, the addition of thermal energy or Brownian motion only leads to a decrease of the hysteresis loop area (see below).
The Stoner–Wohlfarth model predicts that the coercive field at T=0 of an assembly of nanoparticles with randomly oriented axes is given by . The area of the hysteresis is approximatively .
Extension of the Stoner–Wohlfarth model to include temperature and frequency
Extensions of the Stoner–Wohlfarth model have been done to include the influence of the temperature and frequency on the hysteresis loop. They allow to calculate hysteresis area in a rather large range of parameters.
Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization of magnetic multi-domain nanoparticles
|This section requires expansion. (May 2009)|
In multi-domain nanoparticles the basic ingredients to describe the magnetization reversal are the nucleation of new domains and the propagation of domain walls. Both mechanisms are strongly influenced by the structural defects at the surface or inside the nanoparticles and make difficult any quantitative prediction of the hysteresis loops shape and area from intrinsic parameters of the magnetic nanoparticles.
Models to be used for multi-domain nanoparticles
At low magnetic field, the hysteresis loop is expected to be a Rayleigh loop. In this case, the hysteresis area is , where is the Rayleigh constant.
Measuring hyperthermia: in vitro experiments
Producing a high frequency magnetic field
Two basic means to produce the high frequency field necessary to study hyperthermia can be used: the coil and the electromagnet. For the "coil" way, a very simple method to get the high frequency magnetic field is to use an induction furnace, which precisely used a high-frequency magnetic field to heat materials. It is however conceived to work at a single frequency and requires a water cooling system. It is also possible to build electromagnets or coils able to work at various frequencies at the condition to use variable capacitors. It is also possible to get rid of the cooling system in coils at the condition to build them with Litz wire.
Measuring the temperature and artefacts
A platinum or semi-conductor resistance thermometer in a high-frequency magnetic field is self-heated and leads to erroneous temperature measurements. Temperature measurements in hyperthermia can be made using alcohol thermometer, optic fiber thermometers, infrared cameras, or differential heating measurements using traditional semiconductor-based sensing elements.
A colloidal solution heated by an external magnetic field will be subject to convection phenomena so the temperature inside the calorimeter is not homogeneous. Shaking of the colloidal solutions at the end of a measurement or average on several temperature probes can ensure a more accurate temperature measurement.
Materials for magnetic hyperthermia
|This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (May 2009)|
Iron oxide nanoparticles
The most widely used magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia consists in iron oxide nanoparticles. Similar nanoparticles are used as MRI contrast agent. They are in the context of MRI called "Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles", or SPION. The main interest of these nanoparticles are their biocompatibility and their stability with respect to oxidation. The nanoparticles displaying the largest hysteresis area so far are the SPIONs synthesized by magnetotactic bacteria, with A = 2.3 mJ/g although chemically synthesized nanoparticles reach values up to A = 1.5 mJ/g. A typical hyperthermia study uses an inductive heater to measure specific losses (heating power) of the colloidal SPIONS also called a ferrofluid. Hyperthermia depends on material, particle morphology, size, and surface effects.
The higher magnetization of metallic nanoparticles of Co, Fe or FeCo compared to iron oxide increases the maximum SAR values which can be reached using them in hyperthermia applications. A = 1.5 mJ/g has been reported for FeCo nanoparticles, A = 3.25 mJ/g for Co nanoparticles and A=5.6 mJ/g for Fe nanoparticles. The main issue with respect to metallic nanoparticles concerns their protection against oxidation and their eventual toxicity.
Ex vivo experiments
|This section requires expansion. (August 2009)|
Ex vivo experiments in hyperthermia require to make tumor cells absorb magnetic nanoparticles, to place them into an alternative magnetic field and to test their survival rate compared to tumor cells which would follow the same protocol but would not absorb magnetic nanoparticles.
In vivo experiments
|This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (August 2009)|
|This section requires expansion. (August 2009)|
The only hyperthermia setup suitable to treat humans has been developed at the Charité Medical School, Clinic of Radiation Therapy in Berlin. Andreas Jordan's team in this hospital has performed clinical trials on patients with prostate cancers. The clinical trial showed that hyperthermia followed by radiotherapy provided a median survival time of 13.4 months in 59 patients with glioblastoma, which is very high compared with 6.2 months survival for patients in a control group.
- J. Carrey, B. Mehdaoui, M. Respaud, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 083921 (2011).
- L.-M. Lacroix, J. Carrey and M. Respaud, Rev. Sci. Instr. 79, 093909 (2008). http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.3005
- R. Hergt, R. Hiergeist, M. Zeisberger, D. Schüler, U. Heyen, I. Hilger and W. A. Kaiser, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 293, 80 (2005).
- R. Hergt, R. Hiergeist, I. Hilger, W. A. Kaiser, Y. Lapatnikov, S. Margel and U. Richter, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 270, 345 (2004).
- Armijo, L.M.; Brandt, Y.I.; Mathew, D.; Yadav, S.; Maestas, S.; Rivera, A.C.; Cook, N.C.; Withers, N.J.; Smolyakov, G.A.; Adolphi, N.L.; Monson, T.C.; Huber, D.L.; Smyth, H.D.C.; Osiński, M. Iron Oxide Nanocrystals for Magnetic Hyperthermia Applications. Nanomaterials 2012, 2, 134-146
- L.-M. Lacroix, R. Bel Malaki,J. Carrey, S. Lachaize, M. Respaud, G. F. Goya and B. Chaudret, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 023911 (2009), http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4109
- M. Zeisberger, S. Dutz, R. Müller, R. Hergt, N. Matoussevitch, and H.Bönneman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 311, 224 (2005)
- B. Mehdaoui, A. Meffre, L.-M. Lacroix, J. Carrey, S. Lachaize, M. Respaud, M. Gougeon, B. Chaudret, http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4063
- A. Jordan et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 225, 118 (2001). http://vpd.ms.northwestern.edu/Publications_files/Lei/JMMM_225_118_2001.pdf
- M. Johannsen et al., Int. J. of Hyperthermia 21, 637 (2005). http://www.anamacap.fr/telechargement/hyperthermie-vo.pdf
- Maier-Hauff, K. (2011). "Efficacy and safety of intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles combined with external beam radiotherapy on patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme". J. Neurooncol 103: 317–324. doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0389-0.
- Hyperthermia - Cancer therapy hots up article on physics.org