Metropolitanate of Lithuania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Fresco of Emperor Andronikos II Palaiologos, who established the Metropolitanate of Lithuania, which was later regarded as an "anomaly" in the Byzantine policies

The Metropolitanate of Lithuania was a short-lived metropolitanate of the Orthodox Church in the 14th century. Created between 1315 and 1317,[1] it had only two metropolitans and was discontinued in 1371. Its establishment was part of the entry of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania into the rivalry for the religious control of the Rus' principalities between Galicia–Volhynia, the Principality of Tver, and the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The Byzantine Empire, seat of the Patriarch of Constantinople, generally preferred a united Metropolitanate of Kiev and all Rus' and was reluctant to divide its authority. Therefore, whenever possible, the Byzantium would unite the metropolitanates. Facing opposition to actual physical division of the metropolitanates, the Lithuanians employed additional tactics: promotion of their own candidates to the seat of the Metropolitan of Kiev and all Rus'. By the 1440s however, the final years of the Byzantine Empire, the Grand Duchy of Moscow had effectively won the dispute and became the new spiritual center of the Orthodox tradition in Eastern Europe.

Establishment[edit]

The Grand Duchy of Lithuania expanded east at the expense of Slavic Orthodox principalities of the former Kievan Rus'. While adhering to the pagan faith, Grand Dukes Vytenis and Gediminas understood the political importance of controlling the church. At the time, Peter, the Metropolitan of Kiev and all Rus', supported by Galicia–Volhynia, rivaled with Mikhail Yaroslavich, Prince of Tver, who wanted to replace Peter with his own candidate.[2] As a result of this dispute, the seat of the metropolitanate was moved to Moscow.[3] Lithuania had a rather friendly relationship with Tver and perhaps the new metropolitanate was a way to support Mikhail Yaroslavich in his struggle with Metropolitan Peter, whose income was cut and authority in all of Rus' challenged.[4] The Byzantine Empire, afraid of the growing influence of local dukes, generally promoted church unity within the Rus', hoping that a strong united patriarch would be able to resist political intrigues.[5] Therefore, it is unclear why it agreed to establish a new metropolitanate; later the Byzantine authorities regarded it as an "anomaly" or the "result of confusion."[6] Possibly, Emperor Andronikos II Palaiologos, involved in wars with the Ottoman Empire over Asia Minor, needed military and financial assistance, both of which Lithuania could provide.[7] The emperor established the metropolitanate while Patriarch John XIII ordained the prelate.[8]

Metropolitan Theophilus (ca. 1317–1330)[edit]

The Metropolitanate of Lithuania, with the episcopal see in Navahrudak, had two suffragan bishops in Turov and Polatsk.[1] From 1317 to 1330, it seems that there was only one metropolitan bishop, Theophilus of Rus' origin.[9] A surviving list of his property shows that Theophilus traveled extensively around the Rus' principalities and presented expensive gifts to prominent rulers of the region,[10] perhaps as part of a campaign to become the Metropolitan of Kiev. After Peter's death in 1326, however, Theophilus and a candidate presented by Moscow were rejected by Constantinople as too political.[10] Instead, they appointed independent Theognostus as the new Metropolitan of Kiev and all Rus'. When Theophilus died in 1330, Theognostus succeeded in restoring unity in the Rus':[11] claiming that there were too few Christians in pagan Lithuania, the seat of the Metropolitanate of Lithuania was left vacant.[12] In case a need would arise in future, a new metropolitan could be appointed.[6] In the meantime, Theognostus would have authority over all Rus' and Lithuania.

Metropolitan Roman (1355–1362)[edit]

After Theognostus' death in 1353, at first Grand Duke of Lithuania Algirdas did not attempt to revive the Metropolitanate of Lithuania and instead promoted his own candidate Teodoryt to the see of Kiev and all Rus'. When he failed to gain support in the Byzantium, Teodoryt turned to the schismatic Bulgarian Orthodox Church and received ordination there.[13] Such actions may indicate that Algirdas envisioned an autocephalous church of his own.[14] The angered Byzantines forced Algirdas to change his tactics. He now supported Roman, a monk from Tver and relative of Algirdas' wife Uliana, and even promised to convert to Orthodoxy in exchange for the ordination of Roman.[15] Patriarch Callistus I, rivaled by Philotheus Kokkinos, agreed and ordained Roman as the Metropolitan of Lithuania in 1355.[16]

Roman attempted to assert his authority over all Slavic lands of the Grand Duchy, even though they belonged to the Metropolitanate of Kiev and all Rus', whose patriarch Alexius resided in Moscow.[17] In 1356, after diplomatic struggles, Callistus I united the Metropolitanates of Lithuania and Galicia under Roman, while Alexius retained his title.[17] The rivalry continued, however, until Roman's death in 1362, when Lithuania–Galicia were placed under control of Alexius.[18] In 1371, the Metropolitanate of Lithuania was officially lowered to the rank of a bishopric and placed under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan of Kiev and all Rus'.[17] However, it did not end the political rivalry for religious influence in Rus'. Algirdas successfully promoted his candidate Cyprian while Alexius was still alive.[19] In 1415, Grand Duke Vytautas attempted to re-establish the Metropolitanate of Lithuania and promoted Gregory Tsamblak.[20] The rivalry effectively ended in 1448 when Moscow began selecting the patriarchs independently without approval from the Byzantium, which collapsed in 1453.[21]

References[edit]

Notes
  1. ^ a b Rowell (1994), p. 156
  2. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 152
  3. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 154
  4. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 157
  5. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 170
  6. ^ a b Rowell (1994), p. 163
  7. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 157–158
  8. ^ Meyendorff (1989), p. 95
  9. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 159
  10. ^ a b Rowell (1994), p. 161
  11. ^ Meyendorff (1989), pp. 155–156
  12. ^ Rowell (1994), pp. 162–163
  13. ^ Meyendorff (1989), pp. 164–165
  14. ^ Meyendorff (1989), p. 165
  15. ^ Majeska (1984), pp. 388–389
  16. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 165
  17. ^ a b c Rowell (1994), p. 166
  18. ^ Majeska (1984), p. 389
  19. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 167
  20. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 168
  21. ^ Rowell (1994), p. 169
References