Module talk:Location map/data/CanadaTerrain

	Canada portal This module is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Template	This module does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This module is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Maps Template‑class

	This module is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Template	This module does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Created[edit]

06-Nov-2007: The file "Template:Location map CanadaTerrain" was created November 6, 2007, to allow placing markers over similar terrain maps of Canada. It was created for using the new mapping procedure Template:Location_map_polarx, which can position markers/labels at coordinates skewed to match locations on polar-projection maps. An example using that new template is included to show markers placed on the terrain map of Canada. -Wikid77 20:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split as minimal[edit]

08-Nov-2007: I have split the template description text into a doc file, leaving only a minimal list of settings in the original template. After months of fighting horrific template-resource limits, with templates going wiki-spazoid, I finally discovered the horrific problems of limited templates ~~were~~ were formerly caused by the large "nonincluded" text sections of the map-definition templates. Chock up another nightmare to the wikispastic "<noinclude>" tag, another peculiar child of the wiki language: well, it seems to INCLUDE the "non-included" text well enough to overwhelm files that include the template multiple times. Okay, it didn't really "include" the non-included text, it just semi-included it enough to cause wikigagging on map templates.

Unlike a sane programming language (which might report, "Language stack full, ignoring nested expressions..."), the MediaWiki language, well, sort of wikipukes more vomitous output of the form "[[image:#if:|180px|180|#if:" (or "Unrecognized ["), with the wikivomit output hiding the true meaning that the "language-processing limits have been reached". After months of trimming templates to run within the limited resources, it's great to discover that "nonincluded" text was clogging the MediaWiki language processing & was causing the exceeded resource limits. Well, imagine that: hundreds of wasted hours, and another reason that people abandon efforts to improve Wikipedia. -Wikid77 07:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

10-Feb-2008: In January 2008, new MediaWiki software was installed which vastly raised the limits (see below). -Wikid77 (talk) 18:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New parser verified for 112x more template code[edit]

10-Feb-2008: A WP admin informed me days ago that a new MediaWiki parser was installed in January 2008, which will skip noinclude-sections formerly limited by template-processing limits. I have tested that new parser now, using the CanadaTerrain template as a known limiting case, which formerly choked when holding over 1.5kb of total text.

In January 2008, the MediaWiki software was quietly revolutionized to use a new parser that bypassed unused template coding (such as in conditional false branches) and skipped template-expansion in the bypassed sections. The new parser could process nested templates over 112 times larger than in November 2007.

Today (Feb.10, 2008), I ran temporary tests with "Template:Location map CanadaTerrain" by repeating the Examples section (of doc subpage) 14 times as 42 examples using "Location_map_polarx" (28 times) and "Location_map_many_polarx" (14 times). Those 42 examples, combined, contained 10,108 uses of "Location_map_CanadaTerrain" as 10,108= 14 * (206+206+310) calls/transclusions. Meanwhile the map-spec template Location_map_CanadaTerrain was stuffed as 4620 bytes with block-text (beyond the former limit of 1.5kb) to verify that noinclude-sections are skipped by the new parser. The gargantuan total result was over 46 MEGABYTES (yes) of nested templates, and all 42 examples displayed their Canada maps with no problems: all 46MB+ of template code was processed with no messages reported. Formerly, only 2 mappings of Location_map_polarx were allowed per article; the combined processing of 42 complex mappings with block-text in map-specs was over 112 times more capacity. The calculation yielding "112" uses the ratio of the block-text size (4620), to the original size (860) of map-spec CanadaTerrain, in processing 42 map templates rather than the prior limit of 2 maps: 42/2 * (4620/860) = 112.81. The test of 42 maps was run twice, several hours apart, to double check the 42 generated maps. -Wikid77 (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other issues[edit]

[ Discuss other, unnamed issues here. -Wikid77 ]