Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 9, 1978
Decided March 6, 1978
Full case name Mark Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
Citations 435 U.S. 191 (more)
Holding
Indian tribal courts do not have inherent criminal jurisdiction to try and to punish non-Indians, and hence may not assume such jurisdiction unless specifically authorized to do so by Congress.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Rehnquist, joined by Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens
Dissent Marshall, joined by Burger
Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978)[1] is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the criminal jurisdiction of Tribal courts over non-Indians.

The case was decided on March 6, 1978, with a 6-2 majority. The court opinion was written by William Rehnquist; a dissenting opinion was written by Thurgood Marshall. Judge William J. Brennan abstained.

The case centered on the arrest of Mark Oliphant, a non-Indian, by tribal police. Oliphant argued that the tribal court does not have criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians. Eventually the Supreme Court agreed with him.

The case is considered by Indians and Indian legal scholars to be a crushing setback to Indian tribal sovereignty.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ 435 U.S. 191 (Full text of the decision courtesy of Findlaw.com)

[edit] Further reading

  • Resnik, Judith (1989). "Dependent Sovereigns: Indian Tribes, States, and the Federal Courts". The University of Chicago Law Review 56 (2): 671–759. doi:10.2307/1599849. 
  • Snyder-Joy, Zoaan K. (1995). "Self-Determination and American Indian Justice: Tribal versus Federal Jurisdiction on Indian Lands". in Hawkins, Darnell F.. Ethnicity, Race, and Crime: Perspectives Across Time and Place. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. pp. 310–322. ISBN 0791421953. 
Personal tools