Jump to content

Para-Mongolic languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 08:53, 20 October 2022 (Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: isbn, url, doi, s2cid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 1269/3467). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Para-Mongolic
Mongolic–Khitan
Serbi (Xianbei)
(proposed)
Geographic
distribution
Mongolia, northern China, Lake Baikal region
Linguistic classification? Serbi–Mongolic
  • Para-Mongolic
Subdivisions
Language codes

Para-Mongolic is a proposed group of languages that is considered to be an extinct sister branch of the Mongolic languages. Para-Mongolic contains certain historically attested extinct languages, among them Khitan and Tuyuhun.

Languages

A timeline-based graphical representation of the Mongolic and Para-Mongolic languages

The languages of the Xiongnu, Donghu and Wuhuan might be Para-Mongolic,[1] as might those of the Xianbei and the Tuoba (the founders of the Northern Wei) and Khitan. Because the surviving evidence for Xianbei and Tuoba is very sparse, one can only hypothesize that a genetic relationship could be possible. In the case of Khitan, there is rich evidence, but most of it is written in the two Khitan scripts (large and small) that have yet to be fully deciphered. However, from the available evidence it has been concluded that a genetic relationship to Mongolic is likely.[2][3]

Tuoba

Alexander Vovin (2007) identifies the extinct Tuoba language (Tabγač) as a Mongolic language.[4] However, Chen (2005)[5] argues that Tuoba was a Turkic language.

Shimunek classifies Tuoba as a "Serbi" (i.e., para-Mongolic) language, along with Tuyuhun and Khitan.[6]

Ruanruan

Alexander Vovin (2018) suggests that the Ruanruan language of the Rouran Khaganate was a Mongolic language, close but not identical to Middle Mongolian.[7]

Khitan

Juha Janhunen (2006) classified the Khitan language into the "Para-Mongolic" family, meaning that it is related to the Mongolic languages as a sister group, rather than as a direct descendant of Proto-Mongolic.[8] Alexander Vovin (2017)[9] has also identified several possible loanwords from Koreanic languages into the Khitan language.

Tuyuhun

Vovin (2015) identified the extinct Tuyuhun language as a Para-Mongolic language.[10]

Internal classification

Shimunek (2017) proposes a "Serbi–Awar" group of languages that is a sister branch of the Mongolic languages. Together, the Serbi–Awar and Mongolic languages make up the Serbi–Mongolic languages in Shimunek's classification.[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ Andrews 1999, p. 72.
  2. ^ Janhunen 2003b, pp. 391–394.
  3. ^ Janhunen 2003a, pp. 1–3.
  4. ^ Vovin, Alexander (2007). "Once again on the Tabγač language". Mongolian Studies. XXIX: 191–206.
  5. ^ Chen, Sanping (2005). "Turkic or Proto-Mongolian? A Note on the Tuoba Language". Central Asiatic Journal. 49 (2): 161–73.
  6. ^ a b Shimunek, Andrew (2017). Languages of Ancient Southern Mongolia and North China: a Historical-Comparative Study of the Serbi or Xianbei Branch of the Serbi-Mongolic Language Family, with an Analysis of Northeastern Frontier Chinese and Old Tibetan Phonology. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. ISBN 978-3-447-10855-3. OCLC 993110372.
  7. ^ Vovin, Alexander (2019). "A Sketch of the Earliest Mongolic Language: the Brāhmī Bugut and Khüis Tolgoi Inscriptions". International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics. 1 (1): 162–197. doi:10.1163/25898833-12340008. ISSN 2589-8825. S2CID 198833565.
  8. ^ Janhunen, Juha (2006). The Mongolic Languages. Routledge. p. 393. ISBN 978-1-135-79690-7.
  9. ^ Vovin, Alexander (2017). "Koreanic loanwords in Khitan and their importance in the decipherment of the latter" (PDF). Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 70 (2): 207–215. doi:10.1556/062.2017.70.2.4.
  10. ^ Vovin, Alexander (December 2015). "Some notes on the Tuyuhun (吐谷渾) language: in the footsteps of Paul Pelliot". Journal of Sino-Western Communications. 7 (2).

Bibliography