Subgradient methods are iterative methods for solving convex minimization problems. Originally developed by Naum Z. Shor and others in the 1960s and 1970s, subgradient methods are convergent when applied even to a non-differentiable objective function. When the objective function is differentiable, subgradient methods for unconstrained problems use the same search direction as the method of steepest descent.

Subgradient methods are slower than Newton's method when applied to minimize twice continuously differentiable convex functions. However, Newton's method fails to converge on problems that have non-differentiable kinks.

In recent years, some interior-point methods have been suggested for convex minimization problems, but subgradient projection methods and related bundle methods of descent remain competitive. For convex minimization problems with very large number of dimensions, subgradient-projection methods are suitable, because they require little storage.

Subgradient projection methods are often applied to large-scale problems with decomposition techniques. Such decomposition methods often allow a simple distributed method for a problem.

Let $f:\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ be a convex function with domain $\mathbb{R}^n$. A classical subgradient method iterates

$x^{(k+1)} = x^{(k)} - \alpha_k g^{(k)} \$

where $g^{(k)}$ denotes a subgradient of $f \$ at $x^{(k)} \$. If $f \$ is differentiable, then its only subgradient is the gradient vector $\nabla f$ itself. It may happen that $-g^{(k)}$ is not a descent direction for $f \$ at $x^{(k)}$. We therefore maintain a list $f_{\rm{best}} \$ that keeps track of the lowest objective function value found so far, i.e.

$f_{\rm{best}}^{(k)} = \min\{f_{\rm{best}}^{(k-1)} , f(x^{(k)}) \}.$

which is resultant convex optimized.

### Step size rules

Many different types of step-size rules are used by subgradient methods. This article notes five classical step-size rules for which convergence proofs are known:

• Constant step size, $\alpha_k = \alpha.$
• Constant step length, $\alpha_k = \gamma/\lVert g^{(k)} \rVert_2$, which gives $\lVert x^{(k+1)} - x^{(k)} \rVert_2 = \gamma.$
• Square summable but not summable step size, i.e. any step sizes satisfying
$\alpha_k\geq0,\qquad\sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha_k^2 < \infty,\qquad \sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha_k = \infty.$
• Nonsummable diminishing, i.e. any step sizes satisfying
$\alpha_k\geq0,\qquad \lim_{k\to\infty} \alpha_k = 0,\qquad \sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha_k = \infty.$
• Nonsummable diminishing step lengths, i.e. $\alpha_k = \gamma_k/\lVert g^{(k)} \rVert_2$, where
$\gamma_k\geq0,\qquad \lim_{k\to\infty} \gamma_k = 0,\qquad \sum_{k=1}^\infty \gamma_k = \infty.$

For all five rules, the step-sizes are determined "off-line", before the method is iterated; the step-sizes do not depend on preceding iterations. This "off-line" property of subgradient methods differs from the "on-line" step-size rules used for descent methods for differentiable functions: Many methods for minimizing differentiable functions satisfy Wolfe's sufficient conditions for convergence, where step-sizes typically depend on the current point and the current search-direction. An extensive discussion of stepsize rules for subgradient methods, including incremental versions, is given in the books by Bertsekas [1] and by Bertsekas, Nedic, and Ozdaglar. [2]

### Convergence results

For constant step-length and scaled subgradients having Euclidean norm equal to one, the subgradient method converges to an arbitrarily close approximation to the minimum value, that is

$\lim_{k\to\infty} f_{\rm{best}}^{(k)} - f^* <\epsilon$ by a result of Shor.[3]

These classical subgradient methods have poor performance and are no longer recommended for general use.[4][5] However, they are still used widely in specialized applications because they are simple and they can be easily adapted to take advantage of the special structure of the problem at hand.

During the 1970s, Claude Lemaréchal and Phil. Wolfe proposed "bundle methods" of descent for problems of convex minimization.[6] The meaning of the term "bundle methods" has changed significantly since that time. Modern versions and full convergence analysis were provided by Kiwiel. [7] Contemporary bundle-methods often use "level control" rules for choosing step-sizes, developing techniques from the "subgradient-projection" method of Boris T. Polyak (1969). However, there are problems on which bundle methods offer little advantage over subgradient-projection methods.[4][5]

## Constrained optimization

One extension of the subgradient method is the projected subgradient method, which solves the constrained optimization problem

minimize $f(x) \$ subject to
$x\in\mathcal{C}$

where $\mathcal{C}$ is a convex set. The projected subgradient method uses the iteration

$x^{(k+1)} = P \left(x^{(k)} - \alpha_k g^{(k)} \right)$

where $P$ is projection on $\mathcal{C}$ and $g^{(k)}$ is any subgradient of $f \$ at $x^{(k)}.$

### General constraints

The subgradient method can be extended to solve the inequality constrained problem

minimize $f_0(x) \$ subject to
$f_i (x) \leq 0,\quad i = 1,\dots,m$

where $f_i$ are convex. The algorithm takes the same form as the unconstrained case

$x^{(k+1)} = x^{(k)} - \alpha_k g^{(k)} \$

where $\alpha_k>0$ is a step size, and $g^{(k)}$ is a subgradient of the objective or one of the constraint functions at $x. \$ Take

$g^{(k)} = \begin{cases} \partial f_0 (x) & \text{ if } f_i(x) \leq 0 \; \forall i = 1 \dots m \\ \partial f_j (x) & \text{ for some } j \text{ such that } f_j(x) > 0 \end{cases}$

where $\partial f$ denotes the subdifferential of $f \$. If the current point is feasible, the algorithm uses an objective subgradient; if the current point is infeasible, the algorithm chooses a subgradient of any violated constraint.

## References

1. ^ Bertsekas, Dimitri P. (2015). Convex Optimization Algorithms (Second ed.). Belmont, MA.: Athena Scientific. ISBN 978-1-886529-28-1.
2. ^ Bertsekas, Dimitri P.; Nedic, Angelia; Ozdaglar, Asuman (2003). Convex Analysis and Optimization (Second ed.). Belmont, MA.: Athena Scientific. ISBN 1-886529-45-0.
3. ^ The approximate convergence of the constant step-size (scaled) subgradient method is stated as Exercise 6.3.14(a) in Bertsekas (page 636): Bertsekas, Dimitri P. (1999). Nonlinear Programming (Second ed.). Cambridge, MA.: Athena Scientific. ISBN 1-886529-00-0. On page 636, Bertsekas attributes this result to Shor: Shor, Naum Z. (1985). Minimization Methods for Non-differentiable Functions. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-12763-1.
4. ^ a b Lemaréchal, Claude (2001). "Lagrangian relaxation". In Michael Jünger and Denis Naddef. Computational combinatorial optimization: Papers from the Spring School held in Schloß Dagstuhl, May 15–19, 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2241. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 112–156. doi:10.1007/3-540-45586-8_4. ISBN 3-540-42877-1. MR 1900016.
5. ^ a b Kiwiel, Krzysztof C.; Larsson, Torbjörn; Lindberg, P. O. (August 2007). "Lagrangian relaxation via ballstep subgradient methods". Mathematics of Operations Research 32 (3): 669–686. doi:10.1287/moor.1070.0261. MR 2348241.
6. ^ Bertsekas, Dimitri P. (1999). Nonlinear Programming (Second ed.). Cambridge, MA.: Athena Scientific. ISBN 1-886529-00-0.
7. ^ Kiwiel, Krzysztof (1985). Methods of Descent for Nondifferentiable Optimization. Berlin: Springer Verlag. p. 362. ISBN 978-3540156420. MR 0797754.