Talk:Trinity College, Dublin
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trinity College, Dublin article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Archives: Index, 1 | |||
| This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Werdnabot is no longer running This page will no longer be automatically archived, learn more. Consider leaving this notice up until you have discussed how to handle your archiving. Below is the old text of this message: Werdnabot automatically archives sections on this page that are older than 60 days. The age of a section is determined by its most recent timestamp (sections without a timestamp will not be archived). All archived sections are listed here, by size. When an archive reaches 256 kB, a new one is created. The current archive is Archive 1. A list of all archives is here. |
Archives |
|---|
|
This page will no longer be automatically archived, learn more. |
Contents |
[edit] Use of reference "Extracts from Letters Patent.." in the article
Recently the reference to the "Extracts from Letters Patent.." was removed by an editor who described it as "original research". It was restored with the comment that "It wasn't OR, it was a reference." Then it was removed again with the comment "Use of a primary source is original research. Please see WP:OR."
I checked WP:OR carefully, specifically WP:PRIMARY and the relevant passages are (emphasis added):
"Our policy: Primary sources that have been reliably published (for example, by a university press or mainstream newspaper) may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. Without a secondary source, a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by a reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages from the novel to describe the plot, but any interpretation of those passages needs a secondary source. Do not make analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about information found in a primary source."WP:PRIMARY
WP:PRIMARY does not prohibit the use of primary source material, It simply prohibits interpretation of the primary source material and specifically allows citing passages (quotations).
And that is how the source is used in the text of the article, to provide a source for a quote, not to provide any interpretation. Based on my understanding of the policy, that means that there is no violation of the policy. If I am wrong in my interpretation, then remove the reference. However do so in a way that does not continue the cite error. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Confusion on my part, apologies 79.97.166.36 (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Contradiction
The lede says Catholics first attended in 1753. The main text says 1793 --JimWae (talk) 07:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'll check the issue and fix it with a third party reference soon. Thanks. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 23:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
So perhaps before 1793 they could attend but could not get a degree? In 1824, one of my ggggrandfathers still had to go to Scotland to get a degree in medicine--JimWae (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- This link claims that it was possible for Catholics to study in Trinity before 1793, though taking the degree would be incompatible with their faith. It seems to argue that the 1793 law removed some obstacles, but that some remained for those wishing to become Fellows or Scholars.Autarch (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
In 1826, Darwin,a non-Catholic, also went to Edinburgh to get his degree. Oxford & Cambridge (at least) were under the Church of England and required students to sign the Thirty-nine Articles of the Anglican faith. Was Trinity different?--JimWae (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- This states that there were religious tests for offices in Trinity as late as 1873, with the Divinity school reserved for Anglicans. This seems to cover Fawcetts' bill which removed tests for most offices. It doesn't seem to explicity state that the tests being removed were Anglican.Autarch (talk) 12:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
This article should be merged with University of Dublin as they're the same place and there is quite a bit of repetition. Stifle (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Actually they are very separate institutions, different functions. The size and scope of the university merits several articles, as at Ox or Cantab. The articles do appear the same at the moment, clearly some well meaning, but misinformed young chap has gone and duplicated material. Fair play to him, but we'll have to work back and undo the damage. Happy editing. P.s. I think this discussion has been had before and the consensus was keep. Ktlynch (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with the above comment but understand entirely why the proposal was made - it is a complicated situation which isn't explained very clearly in the introduction. It would be good if someone better acquainted with the system could put something in for the rest of us! Johnhousefriday (talk) 12:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Merge Actually they are one and the same body. First of all in the Trinity College page it clearly states and correctly cites "Trinity College and the University of Dublin have a complex relationship, and while a "difference or distinction" between the two is often asserted, it has been said that they are "one body" - this was the finding of the High Court of Justice of Ireland delivered by the then Master of the Rolls in Ireland, Andrew Maxwell Porter on 2 June 1888, which reviews a legal history where he finds that the two terms seem often to have been used interchangeably. In the Irish Senate on 18 April 2000 David Norris - one of the three senators representing the Trinity College constituency in the Irish Senate and an employee of the College - admitted that there is "no difference or distinction" between Dublin's Trinity College and the University of Dublin". Second of all, the emblem used and the title University of Dublin can be observed from many different departments and offices within Trinity College, including TCD's home website page. However, the difference between Trinity College Dublin and its sisters Trinity College Oxford, and Trinity College Cambridge (As the name of the college suggests Trinity meaning Three) is that Trinity College Dublin is the only college within The university of Dublin and therefore it does not make sense to use the title University of Dublin, Trinity College. Whereas in Oxford and Cambridge, Trinity college just represents one college amongst many (for example Caius college in Cambridge, and Oriel college in Oxford)and this is why oxford and cambridge use University of Oxford Trinity College and University of Cambridge Trinity College. However, it also makes no sense for Trinity College Dublin to use the status as University as this would indicate a number of Colleges linked together and as stated above, it clearly is not more than one college. However, It is understandable why the University of Dublin has only Trinity College as its lone institution. When the idea to create a University in Ireland was first conceived, Trinity College was initially designed to be the first of many Irish colleges within the Dublin University. It was believed this would quell the revolutionary tendencies of Catholic Irishmen in seeking independence for Ireland. This was the main reason of the university being for the Protestant ascendency. The British Governments idea was by educating the Protestant Irishmen to the British way of thinking, they would impose this education upon the Catholics through harsh methods which would in turn compel the Catholic Irishmen to conform in order to survive. However, after it was discovered by the British Government that many of the revolutionary leaders within Ireland were from the Protestant ascendency and were educated at Trinity College, it was decided it was a bad idea to educate the Irish. When Ireland became independent in 1922, the Irish government viewed it as a British institution and failed to capitalise on its benefits to the Irish population by funding it appropriately. They had resisted in following on the initial plan of creating more colleges within the university, primarily because it was a British idea and the British were the bad guys. The Irish government took on the personality of a spoilt child and there was no way they were going to implement an idea conceived by their former masters. It didn’t matter if this was detrimental to the survival of the newly formed Irish republic or if the people within Ireland wanted or needed to be educated. However, the Irish Government may have changed their view and if the government get their way and they may do now with the current economic crisis and because of a report earlier last year recommending a sizing down of colleges in Ireland where it was cited 25 colleges existed in Dublin alone, the government may force the merging of Trinity College Dublin with University College Dublin and Dublin City University thereby creating a three tier third level education system with the University of Dublin in the highest tier and as the top ranking instution that will lead research in Ireland. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.17.164.155 (talk) 02:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep They are most certainly separate institutions as the University itself has a range of different functions from the its lone constituent college, Trinity College. For example, I hold a degree from the University of Dublin, not Trinity College. This is much the same as the University of Oxford where graduates hold a degree awarded by the university, rather than by Trinity College, a constituent college of the University of Oxford. Simply because the University of Dublin has only one constituent college, Trinity College, does not invalidate the nuanced relationship between the two bodies. There are important differences and separate pages should be maintained. Lordciansworth (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Picture of the Front Square
It is quite frankly horrible. I will take my camera with me during the week and replace it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.43.176.10 (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Corporate designation
I think the reference to the body corporate (i.e. those that own the College) is given far too much emphasis at the start of this article. It is akin to having "Apple Computers, corporately owned by THE SHAREHOLDERS OF APPLE COMPUTERS." I am going to change this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.232.52.250 (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Trinity Ball
Listing the acts at the ball seems to be a breach of WP:NOTNEWS - especially when the edits are made a few hours before the ball.Autarch (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Update Needed?
This article has been flagged "Update Needed" but Claritas hasn't said on this page what he feels needs updating. Any guidance? cjl (talk) 14:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Switch to new archive bot
Any suggestions on which bot to replace the old one?Autarch (talk) 20:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Old laws still in force
I've found these old laws regarding students at Trinity college and i wonder if it's still in force or not? Apparently by law, students of the college are allowed to have a glass of wine when requested during an exam if they are carring their sword and also that it is illegal to walk through the college without a sword. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Some of those, at least, are urban legends. The trouble is that most of the original documents of the college are in Latin, and who wants to spend their time translating those? The College Calendar, an extremely long document available on the website, lists the regulations and rules that actually apply. --86.46.110.183 (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 09:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Trinity College, Dublin → Trinity College Dublin — Per WP:COMMONNAME. The official name (given in the revised 2010 statutes and common name (used on the website and elsewhere) both no longer use the comma in the name. Kwekubo (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- List of Trinity College, Dublin student organisations → List of Trinity College Dublin student organisations
- Oppose for now. Common name is not determined by what the university places on its own website. Do you have any evidence that common usage has changed? Note for example that University College Dublin has for 12 years been officially called University College Dublin - National University of Ireland, Dublin, but AFAICS common usage has rejected the new snappy title. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose, apart from there being consensus already against this, it's often referred to by the full title "Trinity College, University of Dublin" in official publications. Many publications refer to the college as Trinity College, Dublin since that is an established form arising from the the collegiate system in the two universities in the UK. The distinction has become blurred in Ireland since the second college has not yet been founded.Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Admission of Roman Catholics in 1793
Someone wanted a reference for this and it is the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1791 as adopted by the Irish parliament in 1793, section 13
- "XIII.. And whereas it may be expedient, in case his Majesty, his heirs and successors, shall be so pleased so to alter the statutes of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity near Dublin and of the University of Dublin, as to enable persons professing the Roman Catholic religion to enter into, or to take degrees in the said university, to remove any obstacle which now exists by statute law; be it enacted, that from and after the first day of June 1793 it shall not be necessary for any person upon taking any of the degrees usually conferred by the said university, to make or subscribe any declaration, or to take any oaths of allegiance and abjuration."
The problem was not the law but the subsequent general ban on Catholics entering by the Catholic Church itself. If you were rich an exception was usually made. The policy ended with McQuaid's retirement in 1972. A poem went "Young men may loot, perjure and shoot / And even have carnal knowledge / But however depraved, their souls will be saved / If they don't go to Trinity College".86.42.192.214 (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)