Talk:17th Training Wing

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Shield[edit]

Can we put up a picture of the 17th TW shield on here ?

12.149.39.84 19:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doolittle?[edit]

Surely a unit formed in 1952 would shy away from taking credit for a 1942 raid? Chris the speller 21:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It can claim to have contributed airplanes and crews, but the group itself did not participate in the raid, and therefore its successor cannot claim such history either. Along those lines, the wing per AFI 84-105 can claim to be a successor but is not a lineal descendant of the group. They are two separate entities. I deleted, then restored the history, to give background to the honors that have been bestowed on the wing frpom the group. But AFHRA does not bestow the history, even though AFI 84-105 separates "history" from "honors". AFAIK, no active wing carries the history of a group it succeeds, except where that group is a current component of the wing (which the 17th Training Group, a support and not an operations unit, is not). The AFI states that organizations cannot claim the history, but can "explain" the relationship and continuity of mission in pamphlets, etc. Restoring the history here serves that function.--Reedmalloy (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

?[edit]

Does this wing do 9S100 training as well?

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://afhra.maxwell.af.mil/rso/rso_index.html
- In Hamilton Air Force Base on 2011-03-22 19:58:15, 404 Not Found
- In Hamilton Air Force Base on 2011-04-18 04:46:30, 404 Not Found
- In 13th Bomb Squadron on 2011-05-23 02:58:17, 404 Not Found
- In 17th Training Wing on 2011-05-25 02:00:51, 404 Not Found
- In 1st Troop Carrier Group on 2011-05-25 06:54:14, 404 Not Found
- In 13th Bomb Squadron on 2011-06-01 15:07:57, 404 Not Found
- In 17th Training Wing on 2011-06-01 22:26:07, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.af.mil/history/17trw.asp
- In 17th Training Wing on 2011-05-25 02:01:01, 404 Not Found
- In 17th Training Wing on 2011-06-01 22:26:13, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 17th Training Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070401033357/http://afhra.maxwell.af.mil:80/rso/rso_index.html to http://afhra.maxwell.af.mil/rso/rso_index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 17th Training Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]