Talk:2009–10 NCAA football bowl games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does Wiki really need to be an advertiser for various bowl sponsors?[edit]

"Allstate" Sugar Bowl. "Konica Minolta" Gator Bowl. etc., etc., -- is there any particular reason that Wiki bothers to actually identify the sponsor's names with these bowls? I get why the sports nets do it, they don't want to tick off advertisers. Why is it needful here to refer to these games as anything other than the "Sugar Bowl" or the "Gator Bowl". About the only time this is justified is when the entire reason the bowl exists is because the sponsor has initiated the bowl in the first place, hardly the case for about 90% of the bowls.
--OBloodyHell (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no need to refer to the "Orange Bowl" as the "FedEx Orange Bowl" as wikipedia is not receiving revenues for advertising for FedEx, however, it does seem unfair to remove some sponsors names and not others. What about the Chick-fil-A Bowl, should if be replaced with the Peach Bowl? -- DrWarEagle (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map has wrong color for AL.[edit]

The map shows Alabama in black, indicating 4 or more bowl games. I believe there are only 3 in the state - PapaJohns (B'ham), GMAC and Senior (Mobile). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.181.12.111 (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see AL in dark green, indicating 2, the correct number. 4 or more is shown in dark red... Ryan2845 (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2009–10 NCAA football bowl games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2009–10 NCAA football bowl games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]