Talk:2010 Melbourne Storm season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disagree that this article should be merged with Melbourne Storm as I contains too much info about this event which was very significant by itself. That is why this info was extracted from Melbourne Storm in the first place and replaced with a summary. There could be merit, however, in combining it with the Melbourne Storm 2010 season page instead. Anderch (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also disagree. It was put in melbourne storm page by anti-melbourne fans who made sure it took up almost 50% of the total article. Bulldogs salary cap breach does not take up nearly this much, so neither should melbourne's regardless if it was a bigger one.60.224.3.242 (talk) 08:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is against the merge. I'm removing the tag accordingly. --Mkativerata (talk) 22:47, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Melbourne Storm season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]