Talk:Adventure Time season 2

Adventure Time season 2 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Adventure Time season 2 is part of the Seasons of Adventure Time series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 14, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
March 22, 2019	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Cartoon Network Mid‑importance

	Cartoon Network portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adventure Time (season 2)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 17:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, yo, yo, it's ya'boy Khanassassin again, ready for anotha review! --Khanassassin ☪ 17:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)--Khanassassin ☪ 17:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

If I'm correct, "second season" shouldn't be bold; I noticed you did the same at the season one article. Has the rule changed?
Hmm, I'm not sure. I've always done this. I might need to check.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't it be "the American animated television series" (same at season one)? That's how I do it.
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The episode 'It Came from the Nightosphere' was even nominated for a..." Isn't the even a bit POV-ish?
Removed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Development

Concept

Completely fine, but isn't it somewhat worth mentioning that it's not just the season that follows these two guys on their adventures, because currently it sounds like this is season two-exclusive, if you know what I mean.
I was trying to make reference to the fact that Finn is 13 in the season, but you're right. Changed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! Well, that actually makes sense. You can change it back, if you feel it would work better. --Khanassassin ☪ 13:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Production

"After the series debuted on April 5, 2010, with "Slumber Party Panic", the series was quickly renewed for a second season of 26 eleven minute segments." Could you change "the series" (first time) to Adventure Time? I think it would read slightly better.
Good catch.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Around August 2010, the writing for the second season was finished, and the production staff even had received bits of animation from the show's overseas animation staff." Can you drop the "even"?
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"...the episode was not quite finished." I'm probably wrong, but the "quite" sound just a bit unencyclopedic to me...
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

It's fine.

Reception

Ratings

It's fine.

Reviews and accolades

And again, it's fine.

Home media

Fine, but the first two mentions of "region" are non-caps, like they should be, while the third isn't. And you should link the first "region 1" too.
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

All cool.

Nice article, Just a Lil Bit of more work needed. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 18:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Except for the first one, I have fixed all the issues. Let me check that one out.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I'm pretty sure it should be non-bold, so I'm de-bolding it for now. If you happen to find out that it should be bold it, then just re-bold it. The rest of the issues have been taken care of, so congrats! I give this article_{of a notoriously overrated show (sorry)}a Pass! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 13:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Adventure Time (season 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/04/06/monday-cable-pawning-damages-em-nurse-jackie-damaged/47625

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Adventure Time (season 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Royal tart" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Royal tart has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 13 § Royal tart until a consensus is reached. BaduFerreira (talk) 17:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]