Talk:Alfriston

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alfriston article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This is just a thought, but wouldn't it make more sense for the church notes and something from here and here were to be included in this article, saving the need for two sub articles perhaps? I am sure, too, there is much more can be said about the civil parish, which is more than just the village itself Peter Shearan 12:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know what the conical structure as illustrated in the car Park is? I was in Alfriston today and it intrigued me.

Comments[edit]

I see that nothing has happened since I wrote the note above twenty months ago! Considering the amount of information contained in the references, it is a pretty poor effort, this article. And the answer to the question above is contained within the pic info, and should have been included Peter Shearan (talk) 07:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite[edit]

It was a pity that, although it looks as though more information had been included, it had been lifted from the website and another editor cut it out: which meant that half the facts about Alfriston were lost. The article was very sletchy anyway, especially since as I remarked above, there was so much to say. Peter Shearan (talk) 11:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Litlington[edit]

In accordance with Wikipedia:WikiProject_UK_geography/How_to_write_about_settlements one of the recommendations is that, in order to reduce the number of stubs, villages and other settlements within a civil parish should be in one article. Hence I am recommending the merge. MortimerCat (talk) 23:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chalk horse on Hindover Hill?[edit]

The computer game Pimania had a prize that was given out as stated at a chalk horse on hindover hill, near litlington. Is there a chalk horse - I see no mention of it in article and should be included if so? LeeVJ (talk) 23:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alfriston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]