Talk:Amel Yachts

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Sailing Mid‑importance

	Amel Yachts is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caissons and GFRP[edit]

From the article: "During World War II, Amel noticed that the floating caissons used by invading Allied naval forces in France relied on a fiberglass and polyester resin construction".

Something seems to have gone wrong here.

A caisson (engineering) does not float; it is a fixed structure. A floating part is a pontoon.
This passage seems to refer to the two Mulberry Harbours used in Normandy. The caissons were of concrete, and the pontoons of steel or concrete.
The Mulberries were a British idea (the Americans didn't like it much), and were fabricated in Britain. GFRP was an American invention, and Britain did not have that technology (either the fibreglass or the resin) in 1944.
The storm of 19 June 1944 destroyed the American Mulberry (on Omaha Beach). The Americans thereafter landed supplies using Landing Ship, Tanks (rather more efficiently than the British did at the surviving Mulberry). Those were made by conventional shipbuilding techniques, out of steel.
From the Wiki article on pontoons: "Before the 1970s, glass-reinforced plastic was rare".

Narky Blert (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source that says Amel saw Caissons made of polyester resin at Arromanches... see the correction. They were "Allied troops", so that fits the American invention part of your argument. I see many references to floating caissons on the web. With great respect, I would say that your arguments above are close to original research.198.58.162.149 (talk) 04:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]