Talk:Angel (Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode)

Television: Buffyverse / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Buffyverse task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opinions[edit]

The entire writing section seems to be completely redundant. Coredlia shallow? Well, yes. If it went entirely, I don't think the article would suffer.

And I could swear Kendra never assuemd Buffy was a vampire. Kendra is naive but I don't think she makes such a rookie mistake, despite the smooches she saw.Lots42 09:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Buffy107.jpg[edit]

Image:Buffy107.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

feeding on humans[edit]

If I remember right, in "Darla (Angel episode)", Darla (vampire) says something to the effect of "Oh, sure, you feed on criminals, but if you're still a real vampire you'll kill this innocent baby." I was about to add this to Continuity but thought I'd better seek confirmation, as it's six years since I saw that episode. —Tamfang (talk) 23:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found it in a purported copy of the script that I downloaded from somewhere-or-other.

ANGEL: I've killed men. You've seen it --

DARLA: Rapists and murderers. Thieves and scoundrels. Did you think I wouldn't notice? Only evil-doers. That's all you hunt anymore --

—Tamfang (talk) 01:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

breathless summary[edit]

Recently added to the lede:

The narrative follows Buffy, coming to terms with her feelings for Angel. However when the pair finally kiss, she makes a shocking discovery: Angel's a vampire! But Darla is playing a deadly game manipulating both Buffy and Angel to the Master's will: one of them will die...

I'd prefer something that reads less like a TV Guide listing, but that's just me. —Tamfang (talk) 04:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]