This article was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Seems top be consensus that there is not a clear primary topic.(non-admin closure) Turnagra (talk) 04:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, not convinced there's a PRIMARYTOPIC by long-term significance.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No primary topic for this minor article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The subject dominates in usage and page views and appears to meet our primary topic standards. That it is a "minor" article isn't relevant (although I'd say it's hard to say a subject that gets over a hundred views per day is minor by most standards), as we determine primary topic by comparing to others of the same name. A subject can be the most insignificant-seeming subject in the world and still be a primary topic.--Yaksar(let's chat) 06:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. While neither of the sportspeople has a great deal of long-term significance, either is more significant than this media personality. The case for primary topic is very weak indeed. But I question whether (pitchman) is a suitable disambiguator. I had to look up what it means, and note that Pitchman has been redirected to both Hawker and Spokesperson (or Spokesman) at various times. I cannot find any other current use of this disambiguator and think it should be avoided. Andrewa (talk) 17:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No PTOPIC among these three people. I agree with Andrewa that the disambiguator (pitchman) is unclear if not unintelligible. Narky Blert (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
