Talk:Application posture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I've merged sovereign application and transient application into this; I'm unconvinced of the notability of these concepts, but at least this puts them all into a single article that can be either expanded or deleted later, as appropriate. -- Karada (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to OOP?[edit]

I've removed the following sentence, it seems to be original research. Diego (talk) 14:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"These classifications are key when designing an object-oriented user interface because such an interface may not be suitable for a transient application."

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Application posture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]